Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.03558 v1 pith:SEKQ6UAD submitted 2024-03-06 cs.CL

Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problem

classification cs.CL
keywords hallucinationunanswerablelanguagemathproblemwordapproachcalled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are highly effective in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, they are susceptible to producing unreliable conjectures in ambiguous contexts called hallucination. This paper presents a new method for evaluating LLM hallucination in Question Answering (QA) based on the unanswerable math word problem (MWP). To support this approach, we innovatively develop a dataset called Unanswerable Math Word Problem (UMWP) which comprises 5200 questions across five categories. We developed an evaluation methodology combining text similarity and mathematical expression detection to determine whether LLM considers the question unanswerable. The results of extensive experiments conducted on 31 LLMs, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, LLaMA, and Claude, demonstrate that in-context learning and reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) training significantly enhance the model's ability to avoid hallucination. We show that utilizing MWP is a reliable and effective approach to assess hallucination. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Yuki-Asuuna/UMWP.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RLMF uses quality of model self-judgments to refine RL rankings and select training data, achieving SOTA faithful calibration while preserving accuracy and outperforming standard RL by up to 63%.

  2. Enhancing LLM Metacognition via Cognitive Pairwise Training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CPT is introduced as a pairwise reasoning-trace comparison stage that improves the reasoning-metacognition trade-off over standard SFT+RL pipelines across model scales.

  3. Neural Message-Passing on Attention Graphs for Hallucination Detection

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    CHARM trains graph neural networks on token-attention graphs built from LLM computational traces and outperforms prior hallucination detectors on five benchmarks at token and response level.