Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLM3:Large Language Model-based Task and Motion Planning with Motion Failure Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.11552 v3 pith:36RDQVAY submitted 2024-03-18 cs.RO cs.AI

LLM3:Large Language Model-based Task and Motion Planning with Motion Failure Reasoning

classification cs.RO cs.AI
keywords motionplanningreasoningtaskactionfailuretampcontinuous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conventional Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) approaches rely on manually crafted interfaces connecting symbolic task planning with continuous motion generation. These domain-specific and labor-intensive modules are limited in addressing emerging tasks in real-world settings. Here, we present LLM^3, a novel Large Language Model (LLM)-based TAMP framework featuring a domain-independent interface. Specifically, we leverage the powerful reasoning and planning capabilities of pre-trained LLMs to propose symbolic action sequences and select continuous action parameters for motion planning. Crucially, LLM^3 incorporates motion planning feedback through prompting, allowing the LLM to iteratively refine its proposals by reasoning about motion failure. Consequently, LLM^3 interfaces between task planning and motion planning, alleviating the intricate design process of handling domain-specific messages between them. Through a series of simulations in a box-packing domain, we quantitatively demonstrate the effectiveness of LLM^3 in solving TAMP problems and the efficiency in selecting action parameters. Ablation studies underscore the significant contribution of motion failure reasoning to the success of LLM^3. Furthermore, we conduct qualitative experiments on a physical manipulator, demonstrating the practical applicability of our approach in real-world settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Recover, Discover, Plan: Learning Skills and Concepts from Robot Failures

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ReSYNC learns recovery skills via RL then discovers and refines relational predicates to enable abstract planning that generalizes failure avoidance to unseen long-horizon tasks, outperforming baselines by over 50% in...

  2. APIVOT: Adaptive Planning with Interleaved Vision-Language Thoughts

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A VLM planner that adaptively inserts latent visual thoughts of future states into its reasoning trace beats language-only and prior VLM planners on long-horizon kitchen tasks, especially under tight free space.

  3. Hi Robot: Open-Ended Instruction Following with Hierarchical Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A hierarchical VLA architecture lets robots follow complex instructions and situated feedback by separating high-level reasoning from low-level control.