Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12482 v2 pith:T7X4TXY3 submitted 2024-03-19 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.MA
keywords agentsllmscooperationefficiencyembodiedlanguageleadershipmulti-agent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as integral tools for reasoning, planning, and decision-making, drawing upon their extensive world knowledge and proficiency in language-related tasks. LLMs thus hold tremendous potential for natural language interaction within multi-agent systems to foster cooperation. However, LLM agents tend to over-report and comply with any instruction, which may result in information redundancy and confusion in multi-agent cooperation. Inspired by human organizations, this paper introduces a framework that imposes prompt-based organization structures on LLM agents to mitigate these problems. Through a series of experiments with embodied LLM agents and human-agent collaboration, our results highlight the impact of designated leadership on team efficiency, shedding light on the leadership qualities displayed by LLM agents and their spontaneous cooperative behaviors. Further, we harness the potential of LLMs to propose enhanced organizational prompts, via a Criticize-Reflect process, resulting in novel organization structures that reduce communication costs and enhance team efficiency.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SpatialScore: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation for Spatial Intelligence

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Presents SpatialScore benchmark for MLLM spatial reasoning, evaluates 49 models showing large human gap, and supplies SpatialCorpus plus SpatialAgent to improve performance.

  2. Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A warm-start error-injection pipeline yields 12,326 golden-labeled multimodal agent failures, and current LLMs remain weak at step-and-mode failure attribution.

  3. Tool Use Enables Undetectable Steganography in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tool-using LLM agents can implement undetectable stegosystems, shifting the primary barrier to covert multi-agent collusion from technical feasibility to coordination without explicit agreement.

  4. Navigating the Clutter: Waypoint-Based Bi-Level Planning for Multi-Robot Systems

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Waypoint-based bi-level planning with curriculum RLVR improves multi-robot task success rates in dense-obstacle benchmarks over motion-agnostic and VLA baselines.

  5. TeamFusion: Supporting Open-ended Teamwork with Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    TeamFusion uses per-member proxy agents and iterative structured discussions to generate more representative and consensual team deliverables than direct aggregation in open-ended tasks.

  6. Wrong Code, Right Structure: Learning Netlist Representations from Imperfect LLM-Generated RTL

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training on filtered, functionally imperfect LLM-generated RTL netlists lets GNNs match or beat models trained on scarce clean netlist data for sub-circuit identification.

  7. Tacit Coordination of Large Language Models

    cs.GT 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 20+ open-source LLMs, tacit coordination in focal-point games is often at or above human levels, with systematic failures on cultural and numerical salience that culture prompts partially fix.

  8. To trust or not to trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.CR 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces six-dimension trustworthiness definition and attention-based A-Trust score with a TMS to improve LLM-MAS robustness against malicious or unreliable messages.

  9. Is Inter-Seed Cross-Play Enough? Evaluating the Robustness of Zero-Shot Coordination Algorithms to Implementation Details

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For Other-Play in Yokai, agents trained with different implementation details coordinate across implementations about as well as across seeds, supporting inter-seed cross-play as a proxy for cross-implementation evaluation.

  10. Scaling LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems: Design Principles and Architectural Scalability Analysis

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Architecturally scaling LLM multi-agent systems raises accuracy at near-linear cost only above a model-capability threshold, peaks at intermediate complexity, and never fixes poor run-to-run consistency.

  11. Agentic Environment Engineering for Large Language Models: A Survey of Environment Modeling, Synthesis, Evaluation, and Application

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    This survey categorizes agentic environments for LLMs by eight attributes and domains, introduces symbolic and neural synthesis paradigms with evaluation, and outlines four agent evolution pathways plus three environm...

  12. Transition from Statistical to Hardware-Limited Scaling in Photonic Quantum State Reconstruction

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Classical shadow tomography on integrated photonics shows a sharp transition from statistical O(M^{-1/2}) error scaling to a hardware-limited floor set by unitary spectral distortions.

  13. The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey

    cs.AI 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of emerging AI agent architectures that organizes single and multi-agent designs around reasoning, planning, tool use, communication, and reflection phases.

Pith tools