Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Language Models Can Reduce Asymmetry in Information Markets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.14443 v1 pith:TLPZQCPY submitted 2024-03-21 cs.AI cs.CLcs.GTcs.LGcs.MAcs.SI

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.GTcs.LGcs.MAcs.SI
keywords informationagentsaccesslanguagemarketplacemodelsabilitybiases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This work addresses the buyer's inspection paradox for information markets. The paradox is that buyers need to access information to determine its value, while sellers need to limit access to prevent theft. To study this, we introduce an open-source simulated digital marketplace where intelligent agents, powered by language models, buy and sell information on behalf of external participants. The central mechanism enabling this marketplace is the agents' dual capabilities: they not only have the capacity to assess the quality of privileged information but also come equipped with the ability to forget. This ability to induce amnesia allows vendors to grant temporary access to proprietary information, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized retention while enabling agents to accurately gauge the information's relevance to specific queries or tasks. To perform well, agents must make rational decisions, strategically explore the marketplace through generated sub-queries, and synthesize answers from purchased information. Concretely, our experiments (a) uncover biases in language models leading to irrational behavior and evaluate techniques to mitigate these biases, (b) investigate how price affects demand in the context of informational goods, and (c) show that inspection and higher budgets both lead to higher quality outcomes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LitLLMs, LLMs for Literature Review: Are we there yet?

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs can draft plausible related-work sections when the task is decomposed into keyword-plus-embedding retrieval, attribution-verified reranking, and plan-based generation, but retrieval coverage remains below 10 perc...

Pith tools