Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Prompt-SAW: Leveraging Relation-Aware Graphs for Textual Prompt Compression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.00489 v2 pith:ZQ3PWNHK submitted 2024-03-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Prompt-SAW: Leveraging Relation-Aware Graphs for Textual Prompt Compression

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords promptpromptscompressedcompressionprompt-sawtask-agnosticbenchmarkevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional abilities for multiple different natural language processing tasks. While prompting is a crucial tool for LLM inference, we observe that there is a significant cost associated with exceedingly lengthy prompts. Existing attempts to compress lengthy prompts lead to substandard results in terms of readability/interpretability of the compressed prompt, with a detrimental impact on prompt utility. To address this, we propose PromptSAW: Prompt compresSion via Relation AWare graphs, an effective strategy for prompt compression over task-agnostic and task-aware prompts. Prompt-SAW uses the prompt's textual information to build a graph and later extracts key information elements in the graph to come up with the compressed prompt. We also propose GSM8K-aug, i.e., an extended version of the existing GSM8K benchmark for task-agnostic prompts in order to provide a comprehensive evaluation platform. Experimental evaluation using benchmark datasets shows that prompts compressed by Prompt-SAW are not only better in terms of readability, but they also outperform the best-performing baseline models by up to 10.1 and 77.1, respectively, for task-agnostic and task-aware settings while compressing the original prompt text by 34.9 and 56.7.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mapping Text to Multiplex Graph: Prompt Compression as L\'evy Walk-Guided Graph Pruning

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RAGP models prompt compression as redundancy-aware pruning on a multiplex graph using Lévy walks, achieving 49.3 average on LongBench at 4x compression versus 48.8 for LongLLMLingua at 3x.

  2. CompLLM: Compression for Long Context Q&A

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A segment-wise soft compression method that provides up to 4x TTFT speedup, 2x KV cache reduction, and comparable or better QA quality at 2x compression.