Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Find The Gap: Knowledge Base Reasoning For Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.10226 v1 pith:XPTLMQAX submitted 2024-04-16 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.LG
keywords knowledgemodelsvisualllmsreasoningexternalinformationmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyze knowledge-based visual question answering, for which given a question, the models need to ground it into the visual modality and retrieve the relevant knowledge from a given large knowledge base (KB) to be able to answer. Our analysis has two folds, one based on designing neural architectures and training them from scratch, and another based on large pre-trained language models (LLMs). Our research questions are: 1) Can we effectively augment models by explicit supervised retrieval of the relevant KB information to solve the KB-VQA problem? 2) How do task-specific and LLM-based models perform in the integration of visual and external knowledge, and multi-hop reasoning over both sources of information? 3) Is the implicit knowledge of LLMs sufficient for KB-VQA and to what extent it can replace the explicit KB? Our results demonstrate the positive impact of empowering task-specific and LLM models with supervised external and visual knowledge retrieval models. Our findings show that though LLMs are stronger in 1-hop reasoning, they suffer in 2-hop reasoning in comparison with our fine-tuned NN model even if the relevant information from both modalities is available to the model. Moreover, we observed that LLM models outperform the NN model for KB-related questions which confirms the effectiveness of implicit knowledge in LLMs however, they do not alleviate the need for external KB.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Augmented Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Review

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A structured taxonomy of inference-time augmentation techniques that connect vision-language models to external symbolic systems, tools, and knowledge sources.

  2. GC-KBVQA: A New Four-Stage Framework for Enhancing Knowledge Based Visual Question Answering Performance

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A modular zero-shot KB-VQA framework using Grounding DINO, dual captioners, semantic caption filtering, and LLM prompting reports new state-of-the-art numbers on OK-VQA, A-OKVQA, and VQAv2.

Pith tools