Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ALCM: Autonomous LLM-Augmented Causal Discovery Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.01744 v2 pith:ZV5ETUEN submitted 2024-05-02 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLstat.ME

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ME
keywords causalalcmdiscoveryframeworkllmsreasoninggraphaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To perform effective causal inference in high-dimensional datasets, initiating the process with causal discovery is imperative, wherein a causal graph is generated based on observational data. However, obtaining a complete and accurate causal graph poses a formidable challenge, recognized as an NP- hard problem. Recently, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has ushered in a new era, indicating their emergent capabilities and widespread applicability in facilitating causal reasoning across diverse domains, such as medicine, finance, and science. The expansive knowledge base of LLMs holds the potential to elevate the field of causal reasoning by offering interpretability, making inferences, generalizability, and uncovering novel causal structures. In this paper, we introduce a new framework, named Autonomous LLM-Augmented Causal Discovery Framework (ALCM), to synergize data-driven causal discovery algorithms and LLMs, automating the generation of a more resilient, accurate, and explicable causal graph. The ALCM consists of three integral components: causal structure learning, causal wrapper, and LLM-driven causal refiner. These components autonomously collaborate within a dynamic environment to address causal discovery questions and deliver plausible causal graphs. We evaluate the ALCM framework by implementing two demonstrations on seven well-known datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that ALCM outperforms existing LLM methods and conventional data-driven causal reasoning mechanisms. This study not only shows the effectiveness of the ALCM but also underscores new research directions in leveraging the causal reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Automated Synthesis and Adversarial Validation of Executable Causal Research Pipelines

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ARA's adversarial protocol-validation pipeline reduced silent causal claims (no sign flips in 33 cases) at the cost of producing more conservative, withheld, or incomplete estimates than a vanilla LLM baseline.

  2. LLM Cannot Discover Causality, and Should Be Restricted to Non-Decisional Support in Causal Discovery

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs are unreliable causal reasoners, so they should be limited to non-decisional search support in causal discovery algorithms.

  3. Causal-Invariant Cross-Domain Out-of-Distribution Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CICDOR learns two causal DAGs for shared and domain-specific user preferences, uses an LLM guided by the FCI algorithm to extract confounders from reviews, and reports consistent accuracy gains over twelve baselines o...

Pith tools