Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLMC: Benchmarking Large Language Model Quantization with a Versatile Compression Toolkit

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06001 v3 pith:2DKPIKAF submitted 2024-05-09 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords quantizationllmctoolkitcompressionaccuracyalgorithmsdatafairly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) are propelling us toward artificial general intelligence with their remarkable emergent abilities and reasoning capabilities. However, the substantial computational and memory requirements limit the widespread adoption. Quantization, a key compression technique, can effectively mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating LLMs, albeit with potential risks to accuracy. Numerous studies have aimed to minimize the accuracy loss associated with quantization. However, their quantization configurations vary from each other and cannot be fairly compared. In this paper, we present LLMC, a plug-and-play compression toolkit, to fairly and systematically explore the impact of quantization. LLMC integrates dozens of algorithms, models, and hardwares, offering high extensibility from integer to floating-point quantization, from LLM to vision-language (VLM) model, from fixed-bit to mixed precision, and from quantization to sparsification. Powered by this versatile toolkit, our benchmark covers three key aspects: calibration data, algorithms (three strategies), and data formats, providing novel insights and detailed analyses for further research and practical guidance for users. Our toolkit is available at https://github.com/ModelTC/llmc.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Smaller Models, Unexpected Costs: Trade-offs in LLM Quantization for Automated Program Repair

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Empirical evaluation of 13 quantization configurations on 6 LLMs for APR shows reduced memory (up to 85%) but increased inference time/energy, different repaired problem sets with little overlap, and 48% of configs st...

  2. Edge-ASR: Towards Low-Bit Quantization of Automatic Speech Recognition Models

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A benchmark of eight post-training quantization methods on Whisper and Moonshine edge speech models across seven datasets, finding 8-bit is safe and 3-bit weights are viable for larger models with advanced methods like SpQR.

Pith tools