Pith. sign in

REVIEW 20 cited by

LLM-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Current and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.11106 v1 pith:67QAZYTL submitted 2024-05-17 cs.MA cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.RO

classification cs.MAcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.RO
keywords llm-basedresearchmulti-agentagentscommunicationdirectionsframeworksfuture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great abilities in various tasks, including question answering, arithmetic problem solving, and poem writing, among others. Although research on LLM-as-an-agent has shown that LLM can be applied to Reinforcement Learning (RL) and achieve decent results, the extension of LLM-based RL to Multi-Agent System (MAS) is not trivial, as many aspects, such as coordination and communication between agents, are not considered in the RL frameworks of a single agent. To inspire more research on LLM-based MARL, in this letter, we survey the existing LLM-based single-agent and multi-agent RL frameworks and provide potential research directions for future research. In particular, we focus on the cooperative tasks of multiple agents with a common goal and communication among them. We also consider human-in/on-the-loop scenarios enabled by the language component in the framework.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Deep-Unfolded Coordination

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Deep Coordinator uses deep unfolding to adapt ADMM-DDP penalty parameters at runtime, delivering 6.18-9.44x faster comparable-quality trajectories in car and quadrotor fleet simulations while scaling to 8x larger systems.

  2. ReCrit: Transition-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Scientific Critic Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ReCrit frames critic interaction as a correctness-transition problem and uses quadrant-based RL rewards to improve LLM performance on scientific reasoning benchmarks by rewarding corrections and robustness while penal...

  3. Multi-Agent Coordination Adaptation via Structure-Guided Orchestration

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MACA frames multi-agent coordination as posterior inference, learns a structural prior to guide orchestration, and reports 8.42% higher performance with 43.19% fewer tokens than adaptive baselines on benchmarks.

  4. Robust Instruction Compliance in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAVIC corrects Bellman backups at instruction boundaries by adjusting the incoming objective and restoring continuation value, enabling consistent estimation under stochastic instruction switching in a unified policy.

  5. Robust Instruction Compliance in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAVIC corrects Bellman backups at instruction boundaries by adjusting the incoming objective and restoring continuation value, enabling consistent estimation under stochastic instruction switching in cooperative MARL.

  6. Do LLM-derived graph priors improve multi-agent coordination?

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated coordination graph priors improve multi-agent reinforcement learning performance on MPE benchmarks, with models as small as 1.5B parameters proving effective.

  7. Joint Optimization of Multi-agent Memory System

    cs.MA 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoMAM jointly optimizes agents in multi-agent LLM memory systems via end-to-end RL and adaptive credit assignment to improve collaboration and performance.

  8. Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents

    cs.CL 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    AgeMem unifies long-term and short-term memory management in LLM agents by exposing memory operations as learnable tool actions trained via three-stage progressive reinforcement learning, outperforming baselines on lo...

  9. WebSailor: Navigating Super-human Reasoning for Web Agent

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WebSailor trains open-source web agents to match proprietary performance on complex information-seeking tasks by generating high-uncertainty scenarios and using a new RL method called DUPO.

  10. Reason Before You Retrieve: Agentic Planning for Multi-modal RAG

    cs.AI 2026-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    MM-R2 claims SOTA multimodal RAG accuracy on InfoSeek and Encyclopedic VQA via intent grounding plus a 10-topic KnowledgeMap, but its teacher trajectories leak the gold Wikipedia page and omit the image.

  11. CoEvolve: Training LLM Agents via Agent-Data Mutual Evolution

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    CoEvolve improves LLM agent performance by 15-19% on AppWorld and BFCL benchmarks through mutual evolution of the agent and data distribution using feedback-driven task synthesis.

  12. Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AgeMem trains LLM agents to manage both long-term and short-term memory through tool calls using a three-stage reinforcement-learning curriculum, reporting gains on five long-horizon benchmarks.

  13. Adaptive Obstacle-Aware Task Assignment and Planning for Heterogeneous Robot Teaming

    cs.RO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    OATH combines adaptive Halton sampling, obstacle-aware clustering with auctions, and LLM-based instruction interpretation to improve task assignment and planning for heterogeneous robot teams in obstacle-rich environments.

  14. Multi-Agent Systems: From Classical Paradigms to Large Foundation Model-Enabled Futures

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey comparing classical multi-agent systems with large foundation model-enabled multi-agent systems, showing how the latter enables semantic-level collaboration and greater adaptability.

  15. LLM-Driven Policy Diffusion: Enhancing Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLMDPD conditions an offline policy-diffusion model on LLM-embedded text task descriptions and a transformer-encoded trajectory prompt, reporting improved success on unseen Meta-World and D4RL tasks, though the evalua...

  16. A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.

  17. RALLY: Role-Adaptive LLM-Driven Yoked Navigation for Agentic UAV Swarms

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    RALLY couples a two-stage LLM consensus module with a QMIX-style role-assignment network and reports higher reward and better generalization than three baselines in drone-swarm coverage simulations.

  18. Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The survey organizes LLM-based multi-agent collaboration mechanisms into a framework with dimensions of actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols, reviews applications across domains, and ident...

  19. Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Survey

    cs.AI 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey consolidating frameworks, data practices, large action models, benchmarks, applications, and research gaps in LLM-brained GUI agents.

  20. A Survey of the State-of-the-Art in Conversational Question Answering Systems

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review that categorizes ConvQA components, techniques, models, and datasets, with no new experimental result.

Pith tools