Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15750 v2 pith:T6OKITZH submitted 2024-05-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidence

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords filteredlinguisticevidenceindirectmodelstrainingcorporacorpus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces Filtered Corpus Training, a method that trains language models (LMs) on corpora with certain linguistic constructions filtered out from the training data, and uses it to measure the ability of LMs to perform linguistic generalization on the basis of indirect evidence. We apply the method to both LSTM and Transformer LMs (of roughly comparable size), developing filtered corpora that target a wide range of linguistic phenomena. Our results show that while transformers are better qua LMs (as measured by perplexity), both models perform equally and surprisingly well on linguistic generalization measures, suggesting that they are capable of generalizing from indirect evidence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A systematic framework for generating novel experimental hypotheses from language models

    cs.CL 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework using language models to simulate non-existent experiments and derive novel testable hypotheses on dative verb acquisition and cross-structural generalization in children.