Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Analysis of the 2024 BraTS Meningioma Radiotherapy Planning Automated Segmentation Challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18383 v3 pith:GMTFRRJ3 submitted 2024-05-28 cs.CV cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

Analysis of the 2024 BraTS Meningioma Radiotherapy Planning Automated Segmentation Challenge

Dominic LaBella , Valeriia Abramova , Mehdi Astaraki , Andre Ferreira , Zhifan Jiang , Mason C. Cleveland , Ramandeep Kang , Uma M. Lal-Trehan Estrada
show 97 more authors
Cansu Yalcin Rachika E. Hamadache Clara Lisazo Adri\`a Casamitjana Joaquim Salvi Arnau Oliver Xavier Llad\'o Iuliana Toma-Dasu Tiago Jesus Behrus Puladi Jens Kleesiek Victor Alves Jan Egger Daniel Capell\'an-Mart\'in Abhijeet Parida Austin Tapp Xinyang Liu Maria J. Ledesma-Carbayo Jay B. Patel Thomas N. McNeal Maya Viera Owen McCall Albert E. Kim Elizabeth R. Gerstner Christopher P. Bridge Katherine Schumacher Michael Mix Kevin Leu Shan McBurney-Lin Pierre Nedelec Javier Villanueva-Meyer David R. Raleigh Jonathan Shapey Tom Vercauteren Kazumi Chia Marina Ivory Theodore Barfoot Omar Al-Salihi Justin Leu Lia M. Halasz Yuri S. Velichko Chunhao Wang John P. Kirkpatrick Scott R. Floyd Zachary J. Reitman Trey C. Mullikin Eugene J. Vaios Christina Huang Ulas Bagci Sean Sachdev Jona A. Hattangadi-Gluth Tyler M. Seibert Nikdokht Farid Connor Puett Matthew W. Pease Kevin Shiue Syed Muhammad Anwar Shahriar Faghani Peter Taylor Pranav Warman Jake Albrecht Andr\'as Jakab Mana Moassefi Verena Chung Rong Chai Alejandro Aristizabal Alexandros Karargyris Hasan Kassem Sarthak Pati Micah Sheller Nazanin Maleki Rachit Saluja Florian Kofler Christopher G. Schwarz Philipp Lohmann Phillipp Vollmuth Louis Gagnon Maruf Adewole Hongwei Bran Li Anahita Fathi Kazerooni Nourel Hoda Tahon Udunna Anazodo Ahmed W. Moawad Bjoern Menze Marius George Linguraru Mariam Aboian Benedikt Wiestler Ujjwal Baid Gian-Marco Conte Andreas M. Rauschecker Ayman Nada Aly H. Abayazeed Raymond Huang Maria Correia de Verdier Jeffrey D. Rudie Spyridon Bakas Evan Calabrese
This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords radiotherapyplanningsegmentationautomatedbrats-men-rtchallengemeningiomatarget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation Meningioma Radiotherapy (BraTS-MEN-RT) challenge aimed to advance automated segmentation algorithms using the largest known multi-institutional dataset of 750 radiotherapy planning brain MRIs with expert-annotated target labels for patients with intact or postoperative meningioma that underwent either conventional external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. Each case included a defaced 3D post-contrast T1-weighted radiotherapy planning MRI in its native acquisition space, accompanied by a single-label "target volume" representing the gross tumor volume (GTV) and any at-risk post-operative site. Target volume annotations adhered to established radiotherapy planning protocols, ensuring consistency across cases and institutions, and were approved by expert neuroradiologists and radiation oncologists. Six participating teams developed, containerized, and evaluated automated segmentation models using this comprehensive dataset. Team rankings were assessed using a modified lesion-wise Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance (95HD). The best reported average lesion-wise DSC and 95HD was 0.815 and 26.92 mm, respectively. BraTS-MEN-RT is expected to significantly advance automated radiotherapy planning by enabling precise tumor segmentation and facilitating tailored treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes. We describe the design and results from the BraTS-MEN-RT challenge.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Redefining Instance Matching: A Unified Framework for Part-Aware Matching in Panoptic Segmentation Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper defines four matching strategies for panoptic quality via degree-bounded bipartite assignment and introduces vertex-based TP/FN/FP counting that extends to part-aware evaluation.

  2. Adaptable Segmentation Pipeline for Diverse Brain Tumors with Radiomic-Guided Subtyping and Lesion-Wise Model Ensemble

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A radiomic-guided subtyping and lesion-wise ensemble pipeline delivers segmentation performance comparable to top entries on diverse BraTS 2025 brain tumor datasets.

  3. Adaptable Segmentation Pipeline for Diverse Brain Tumors with Radiomic-Guided Subtyping and Lesion-Wise Model Ensemble

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0

    A radiomic-guided, lesion-aware ensemble with per-cluster post-processing yields strong segmentation across pediatric, meningioma, and metastasis MRI cohorts, though 'top-ranked' parity is asserted rather than shown.