Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Weak-to-Strong Search: Align Large Language Models via Searching over Small Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19262 v3 pith:PEW4HTIJ submitted 2024-05-29 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords largemodelsmodellanguagetextttsearchsmallweak-to-strong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Large language models are usually fine-tuned to align with human preferences. However, fine-tuning a large language model can be challenging. In this work, we introduce $\textit{weak-to-strong search}$, framing the alignment of a large language model as a test-time greedy search to maximize the log-probability difference between small tuned and untuned models while sampling from the frozen large model. This method serves both as (1) a compute-efficient model up-scaling strategy that avoids directly tuning the large model and as (2) an instance of weak-to-strong generalization that enhances a strong model with weak test-time guidance. Empirically, we demonstrate the flexibility of weak-to-strong search across different tasks. In controlled-sentiment generation and summarization, we use tuned and untuned $\texttt{gpt2}$s to improve the alignment of large models without additional training. Crucially, in a more difficult instruction-following benchmark, AlpacaEval 2.0, we show that reusing off-the-shelf small models (e.g., $\texttt{zephyr-7b-beta}$ and its untuned version) can improve the length-controlled win rates of both white-box and black-box large models against $\texttt{gpt-4-turbo}$ (e.g., $34.4\% \rightarrow 37.9\%$ for $\texttt{Llama-3-70B-Instruct}$ and $16.0\% \rightarrow 20.1\%$ for $\texttt{gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct}$), despite the small models' low win rates $\approx 10.0\%$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating Object Hallucination via Robust Local Perception Search

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free decoding method that uses an MLLM's own local object descriptions as a reward prior, combined with CLIP similarity, to cut object hallucination, especially under adversarial image noise.

  2. Emergent Response Planning in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hidden representations of LLM prompts encode global attributes of the upcoming response, and simple probes can predict length, content choices, and answer confidence before generation begins.

  3. T-REG: Preference Optimization with Token-Level Reward Regularization

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    T-REG adds contrastive-prompt self-generated token-level rewards as a weighted regularizer to DPO and SimPO, improving Alpaca Eval 2 length-controlled win rate by up to 3.8% and Arena-Hard win rate by up to 4.4% over ...

  4. Towards AI-$45^{\circ}$ Law: A Roadmap to Trustworthy AGI

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes the AI-45 degree law, a Causal Ladder framework, and five trustworthiness levels as a roadmap toward trustworthy AGI.

Pith tools