Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Is My Data in Your Retrieval Database? Membership Inference Attacks Against Retrieval Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20446 v3 pith:VHEX3QEU submitted 2024-05-30 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords retrievaldatabasesystemsattackmembershipaugmenteddatadatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have shown great promise in natural language processing. However, their reliance on data stored in a retrieval database, which may contain proprietary or sensitive information, introduces new privacy concerns. Specifically, an attacker may be able to infer whether a certain text passage appears in the retrieval database by observing the outputs of the RAG system, an attack known as a Membership Inference Attack (MIA). Despite the significance of this threat, MIAs against RAG systems have yet remained under-explored. This study addresses this gap by introducing an efficient and easy-to-use method for conducting MIA against RAG systems. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our attack using two benchmark datasets and multiple generative models, showing that the membership of a document in the retrieval database can be efficiently determined through the creation of an appropriate prompt in both black-box and gray-box settings. Moreover, we introduce an initial defense strategy based on adding instructions to the RAG template, which shows high effectiveness for some datasets and models. Our findings highlight the importance of implementing security countermeasures in deployed RAG systems and developing more advanced defenses to protect the privacy and security of retrieval databases.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. External Data Extraction Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SECRET, an adaptive RAG extraction attack that fuses LLM-optimized jailbreak prompts with cluster-guided queries, extracts large portions of private databases from commercial and open LLMs, including ~35% of a sampled...

  2. DCMI: A Differential Calibration Membership Inference Attack Against Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DCMI infers RAG database membership by subtracting the system's yes-probability on a perturbed query from the original query, cancelling the interference of non-member retrieved documents.

  3. MrM: Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks against Multimodal RAG Systems

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MrM is a black-box membership inference attack on multimodal RAG systems that masks key objects in a target image and uses the system's ability to reconstruct them as a membership signal.

  4. Spa-VLM: Stealthy Poisoning Attacks on RAG-based VLM

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spa-VLM crafts paired adversarial images and misleading texts to poison RAG-based VLM knowledge bases, reaching attack success rates above 0.8 with just five injected entries.

  5. Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generation

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoder activation perturbation (SFPF) applied on top of existing jailbreak prompts raises attack success rate on Qwen3-32B, but with no defense evaluation and weak reproducibility.

  6. We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MCP-powered LLM agents are vulnerable to prompt injection from third-party services, and simple detection or filtering defenses do not reliably stop these attacks.

Pith tools