Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Early Investigation into the Utility of Multimodal Large Language Models in Medical Imaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00667 v1 pith:IWVGG6GN submitted 2024-06-02 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.LG
keywords medicaldataimagegeminigpt-4vimagesmodelsanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent developments in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have spurred significant interest in their potential applications across various medical imaging domains. On the one hand, there is a temptation to use these generative models to synthesize realistic-looking medical image data, while on the other hand, the ability to identify synthetic image data in a pool of data is also significantly important. In this study, we explore the potential of the Gemini (\textit{gemini-1.0-pro-vision-latest}) and GPT-4V (gpt-4-vision-preview) models for medical image analysis using two modalities of medical image data. Utilizing synthetic and real imaging data, both Gemini AI and GPT-4V are first used to classify real versus synthetic images, followed by an interpretation and analysis of the input images. Experimental results demonstrate that both Gemini and GPT-4 could perform some interpretation of the input images. In this specific experiment, Gemini was able to perform slightly better than the GPT-4V on the classification task. In contrast, responses associated with GPT-4V were mostly generic in nature. Our early investigation presented in this work provides insights into the potential of MLLMs to assist with the classification and interpretation of retinal fundoscopy and lung X-ray images. We also identify key limitations associated with the early investigation study on MLLMs for specialized tasks in medical image analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Generative Framework for Bidirectional Image-Report Understanding in Chest Radiography

    eess.IV 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    MAViLT claims a single model generates radiology reports, synthesizes chest X-rays from text, and performs VQA, but the paper's evidence is not reproducible.

Pith tools