Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PQPP: A Joint Benchmark for Text-to-Image Prompt and Query Performance Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.04746 v2 pith:6BPBPO5P submitted 2024-06-07 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords performanceretrievalgenerationquerytext-to-imagebenchmarkpromptimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-to-image generation has recently emerged as a viable alternative to text-to-image retrieval, driven by the visually impressive results of generative diffusion models. Although query performance prediction is an active research topic in information retrieval, to the best of our knowledge, there is no prior study that analyzes the difficulty of queries (referred to as prompts) in text-to-image generation, based on human judgments. To this end, we introduce the first dataset of prompts which are manually annotated in terms of image generation performance. Additionally, we extend these evaluations to text-to-image retrieval by collecting manual annotations that represent retrieval performance. We thus establish the first joint benchmark for prompt and query performance prediction (PQPP) across both tasks, comprising over 10K queries. Our benchmark enables (i) the comparative assessment of prompt/query difficulty in both image generation and image retrieval, and (ii) the evaluation of prompt/query performance predictors addressing both generation and retrieval. We evaluate several pre- and post-generation/retrieval performance predictors, thus providing competitive baselines for future research. Our benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/Eduard6421/PQPP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PromptSET is a benchmark of 11,469 questions with nine LLM-generated rephrasings each, and current classifiers and self-evaluation methods predict prompt answerability poorly, especially on multi-hop questions.

Pith tools