Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Soft Prompting for Unlearning in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12038 v2 pith:IISUQ2OF submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Soft Prompting for Unlearning in Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords unlearningllmstextbfdatamodelsfocusforgettingframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The widespread popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs), partly due to their unique ability to perform in-context learning, has also brought to light the importance of ethical and safety considerations when deploying these pre-trained models. In this work, we focus on investigating machine unlearning for LLMs motivated by data protection regulations. In contrast to the growing literature on fine-tuning methods to achieve unlearning, we focus on a comparatively lightweight alternative called soft prompting to realize the unlearning of a subset of training data. With losses designed to enforce forgetting as well as utility preservation, our framework \textbf{S}oft \textbf{P}rompting for \textbf{U}n\textbf{l}earning (SPUL) learns prompt tokens that can be appended to an arbitrary query to induce unlearning of specific examples at inference time without updating LLM parameters. We conduct a rigorous evaluation of the proposed method and our results indicate that SPUL can significantly improve the trade-off between utility and forgetting in the context of text classification and question answering with LLMs. We further validate our method using multiple LLMs to highlight the scalability of our framework and provide detailed insights into the choice of hyperparameters and the influence of the size of unlearning data. Our implementation is available at \url{https://github.com/karuna-bhaila/llm_unlearning}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. POPS: Recovering Unlearned Multi-Modality Knowledge in MLLMs with Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Prompt-optimized suffixes plus synthetic fine-tuning recover ~82% of knowledge that multimodal unlearning methods claim to erase from MLLMs.

  2. Wisdom is Knowing What not to Say: Hallucination-Free LLMs Unlearning via Attention Shifting

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Attention-Shifting uses importance-aware suppression on unlearning data and retention enhancement on retained data via dual-loss optimization to achieve selective unlearning with better utility preservation than prior...