Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14322 v3 pith:XIIX3FPS submitted 2024-06-20 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning

classification cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG
keywords privacyuser-levellanguageunitacrossdatadifferentialfine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for tackling complex tasks across diverse domains, but they also raise privacy concerns when fine-tuned on sensitive data due to potential memorization. While differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit, current evaluations on LLMs mostly treat each example (text record) as the privacy unit. This leads to uneven user privacy guarantees when contributions per user vary. We therefore study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users. We present a systematic evaluation of user-level DP for LLM fine-tuning on natural language generation tasks. Focusing on two mechanisms for achieving user-level DP guarantees, Group Privacy and User-wise DP-SGD, we investigate design choices like data selection strategies and parameter tuning for the best privacy-utility tradeoff.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concordia: Self-Improving Synthetic Tables for Federated LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Concordia aligns synthetic table generation with federated validation utility via client-side utility scorers and group-relative policy optimization to improve LLM adaptation on non-IID tabular tasks.

  2. Concordia: Self-Improving Synthetic Tables for Federated LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Concordia aligns synthetic table generation with federated validation utility via client-level LoRA training, utility scorers, and outer GRPO refinement to boost performance over static synthetic baselines.