REVIEW 2 cited by
PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The most effective techniques to detect LLM-generated text rely on inserting a detectable signature -- or watermark -- during the model's decoding process. Most existing watermarking methods require access to the underlying LLM's logits, which LLM API providers are loath to share due to fears of model distillation. As such, these watermarks must be implemented independently by each LLM provider. In this paper, we develop PostMark, a modular post-hoc watermarking procedure in which an input-dependent set of words (determined via a semantic embedding) is inserted into the text after the decoding process has completed. Critically, PostMark does not require logit access, which means it can be implemented by a third party. We also show that PostMark is more robust to paraphrasing attacks than existing watermarking methods: our experiments cover eight baseline algorithms, five base LLMs, and three datasets. Finally, we evaluate the impact of PostMark on text quality using both automated and human assessments, highlighting the trade-off between quality and robustness to paraphrasing. We release our code, outputs, and annotations at https://github.com/lilakk/PostMark.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CoheMark: A Novel Sentence-Level Watermark for Enhanced Text Quality
CoheMark embeds a sentence-level watermark by requiring sampled sentences to pass fuzzy cluster-membership criteria, achieving TPR@1% above 97% with quality judged better than baselines by GPT-4o.
-
Towards Structurally Explainable Machine-Generated Text Detection: A Graph-Perspective Framework
LM2OTIFS uses word co-occurrence graphs and GNNExplainer to detect and explain machine-generated text, with strong in-domain accuracy but unsupported faithfulness claims and a flawed theoretical proof.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.