Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Holistic Evaluation for Interleaved Text-and-Image Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14643 v3 pith:S6AVLRVM submitted 2024-06-20 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords evaluationinterleavedgenerationqualitytexttext-and-imagebenchmarkcarefully
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Interleaved text-and-image generation has been an intriguing research direction, where the models are required to generate both images and text pieces in an arbitrary order. Despite the emerging advancements in interleaved generation, the progress in its evaluation still significantly lags behind. Existing evaluation benchmarks do not support arbitrarily interleaved images and text for both inputs and outputs, and they only cover a limited number of domains and use cases. Also, current works predominantly use similarity-based metrics which fall short in assessing the quality in open-ended scenarios. To this end, we introduce InterleavedBench, the first benchmark carefully curated for the evaluation of interleaved text-and-image generation. InterleavedBench features a rich array of tasks to cover diverse real-world use cases. In addition, we present InterleavedEval, a strong reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o to deliver accurate and explainable evaluation. We carefully define five essential evaluation aspects for InterleavedEval, including text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness, to ensure a comprehensive and fine-grained assessment. Through extensive experiments and rigorous human evaluation, we show that our benchmark and metric can effectively evaluate the existing models with a strong correlation with human judgments surpassing previous reference-based metrics. We also provide substantial findings and insights to foster future research in interleaved generation and its evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. OpenING: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Judging Open-ended Interleaved Image-Text Generation

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A large new benchmark and an offline judge model for open-ended interleaved image-text generation, with IntJudge matching human agreement better than GPT-4o.

  2. Align Anything: Training All-Modality Models to Follow Instructions with Language Feedback

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes learning from language feedback to synthesize multimodal preference pairs, but the evidence is weakened by an undefined improvement metric and small, unvalidated effect sizes.

Pith tools