Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Responsible Foundation Model Development Cheatsheet: A Review of Tools & Resources

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.16746 v4 pith:46AT2DHF submitted 2024-06-24 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords modeldevelopmenttoolsresourcesresponsiblecapabilitiesevaluationfoundation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Foundation model development attracts a rapidly expanding body of contributors, scientists, and applications. To help shape responsible development practices, we introduce the Foundation Model Development Cheatsheet: a growing collection of 250+ tools and resources spanning text, vision, and speech modalities. We draw on a large body of prior work to survey resources (e.g. software, documentation, frameworks, guides, and practical tools) that support informed data selection, processing, and understanding, precise and limitation-aware artifact documentation, efficient model training, advance awareness of the environmental impact from training, careful model evaluation of capabilities, risks, and claims, as well as responsible model release, licensing and deployment practices. We hope this curated collection of resources helps guide more responsible development. The process of curating this list, enabled us to review the AI development ecosystem, revealing what tools are critically missing, misused, or over-used in existing practices. We find that (i) tools for data sourcing, model evaluation, and monitoring are critically under-serving ethical and real-world needs, (ii) evaluations for model safety, capabilities, and environmental impact all lack reproducibility and transparency, (iii) text and particularly English-centric analyses continue to dominate over multilingual and multi-modal analyses, and (iv) evaluation of systems, rather than just models, is needed so that capabilities and impact are assessed in context.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enabling Secure and Ephemeral AI Workloads in Data Mesh Environments

    cs.DC 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A proposed tool, sskuba-ctl, claims to create ephemeral, self-service Kubernetes clusters in under ten minutes across clouds using an immutable OS and infrastructure-as-code.

Pith tools