Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

H-STAR: LLM-driven Hybrid SQL-Text Adaptive Reasoning on Tables

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.05952 v3 pith:FZUTI6O3 submitted 2024-06-29 cs.DB cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

H-STAR: LLM-driven Hybrid SQL-Text Adaptive Reasoning on Tables

classification cs.DB cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords reasoningh-starsemanticsymbolictabulartextualadaptivedata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Tabular reasoning involves interpreting natural language queries about tabular data, which presents a unique challenge of combining language understanding with structured data analysis. Existing methods employ either textual reasoning, which excels in semantic interpretation but struggles with mathematical operations, or symbolic reasoning, which handles computations well but lacks semantic understanding. This paper introduces a novel algorithm H-STAR that integrates both symbolic and semantic (textual) approaches in a two-stage process to address these limitations. H-STAR employs: (1) step-wise table extraction using `multi-view' column retrieval followed by row extraction, and (2) adaptive reasoning that adapts reasoning strategies based on question types, utilizing semantic reasoning for direct lookup and complex lexical queries while augmenting textual reasoning with symbolic reasoning support for quantitative and logical tasks. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that H-STAR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods across three tabular question-answering (QA) and fact-verification datasets, underscoring its effectiveness and efficiency.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Utilizing Training Data to Improve LLM Reasoning for Tabular Understanding

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    LRTab retrieves error-avoiding prompt conditions learned from incorrect chain-of-thought traces on training tables to improve LLM tabular reasoning, achieving modest gains on WikiTQ and TabFact.

  2. ProgramTab: Boosting Table Reasoning of LLMs via Programmatic Paradigm

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A Python-preprocessing + CoT-SQL pipeline lets LLMs reason over large, inconsistently formatted tables more accurately than prior prompting baselines.