Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Enhancing Language Model Rationality with Bi-Directional Deliberation Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06112 v1 pith:6IXXF5K3 submitted 2024-07-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningbidderbi-directionalfuturehistoricalcontextsdecision-makingdeliberation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces BI-Directional DEliberation Reasoning (BIDDER), a novel reasoning approach to enhance the decision rationality of language models. Traditional reasoning methods typically rely on historical information and employ uni-directional (left-to-right) reasoning strategy. This lack of bi-directional deliberation reasoning results in limited awareness of potential future outcomes and insufficient integration of historical context, leading to suboptimal decisions. BIDDER addresses this gap by incorporating principles of rational decision-making, specifically managing uncertainty and predicting expected utility. Our approach involves three key processes: Inferring hidden states to represent uncertain information in the decision-making process from historical data; Using these hidden states to predict future potential states and potential outcomes; Integrating historical information (past contexts) and long-term outcomes (future contexts) to inform reasoning. By leveraging bi-directional reasoning, BIDDER ensures thorough exploration of both past and future contexts, leading to more informed and rational decisions. We tested BIDDER's effectiveness in two well-defined scenarios: Poker (Limit Texas Hold'em) and Negotiation. Our experiments demonstrate that BIDDER significantly improves the decision-making capabilities of LLMs and LLM agents.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strategy-Augmented Planning for Large Language Models via Opponent Exploitation

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM agent that identifies its opponent's strategy and then searches a learned strategy-evaluation network for the best response substantially outperforms prompt-only LLM planners in MicroRTS.

  2. FishBargain: An LLM-Empowered Bargaining Agent for Online Fleamarket Platform Sellers

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM bargaining agent with price extractor, policy planner, and utterance generator improves deal success rate and sale-to-list ratio on real Xianyu dialogues.

  3. A Survey on Large Language Model-Based Social Agents in Game-Theoretic Scenarios

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    LLM-based game-playing agents are surveyed across choice-focused and communication-focused games, with a comparative performance table and future directions.

Pith tools