Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06192 v2 pith:GKCX3DHP submitted 2024-07-08 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords objecthallucinationobjectslvlmsbehaviorsmodelsmulti-objectmultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large vision language models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, producing objects not present in the given images. While current benchmarks for object hallucination primarily concentrate on the presence of a single object class rather than individual entities, this work systematically investigates multi-object hallucination, examining how models misperceive (e.g., invent nonexistent objects or become distracted) when tasked with focusing on multiple objects simultaneously. We introduce Recognition-based Object Probing Evaluation (ROPE), an automated evaluation protocol that considers the distribution of object classes within a single image during testing and uses visual referring prompts to eliminate ambiguity. With comprehensive empirical studies and analysis of potential factors leading to multi-object hallucination, we found that (1). LVLMs suffer more hallucinations when focusing on multiple objects compared to a single object. (2). The tested object class distribution affects hallucination behaviors, indicating that LVLMs may follow shortcuts and spurious correlations. (3). Hallucinatory behaviors are influenced by data-specific factors, salience and frequency, and model intrinsic behaviors. We hope to enable LVLMs to recognize and reason about multiple objects that often occur in realistic visual scenes, provide insights, and quantify our progress towards mitigating the issues.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Do MLLMs Struggle with Spatial Understanding? A Systematic Analysis from Data to Architecture

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spatial understanding in multimodal LLMs plateaus quickly as training data grows, and position encoding in the visual encoder is the more influential factor.

  2. Retrieval Visual Contrastive Decoding to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RVCD uses YOLO detections and retrieved single-concept AI images to adjust LVLM logits at decode time, cutting CHAIR hallucination rates by roughly half versus prior contrastive decoding baselines.

Pith tools