REVIEW 3 cited by
Cloud Atlas: Efficient Fault Localization for Cloud Systems using Language Models and Causal Insight
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Cloud Atlas: Efficient Fault Localization for Cloud Systems using Language Models and Causal Insight
read the original abstract
Runtime failure and performance degradation is commonplace in modern cloud systems. For cloud providers, automatically determining the root cause of incidents is paramount to ensuring high reliability and availability as prompt fault localization can enable faster diagnosis and triage for timely resolution. A compelling solution explored in recent work is causal reasoning using causal graphs to capture relationships between varied cloud system performance metrics. To be effective, however, systems developers must correctly define the causal graph of their system, which is a time-consuming, brittle, and challenging task that increases in difficulty for large and dynamic systems and requires domain expertise. Alternatively, automated data-driven approaches have limited efficacy for cloud systems due to the inherent rarity of incidents. In this work, we present Atlas, a novel approach to automatically synthesizing causal graphs for cloud systems. Atlas leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate causal graphs using system documentation, telemetry, and deployment feedback. Atlas is complementary to data-driven causal discovery techniques, and we further enhance Atlas with a data-driven validation step. We evaluate Atlas across a range of fault localization scenarios and demonstrate that Atlas is capable of generating causal graphs in a scalable and generalizable manner, with performance that far surpasses that of data-driven algorithms and is commensurate to the ground-truth baseline.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Towards In-Depth Root Cause Localization for Microservices with Multi-Agent Recursion-of-Thought
RCLAgent uses multi-agent recursion-of-thought with parallel reasoning on trace graphs to outperform prior methods in root cause localization accuracy and efficiency for microservice systems.
-
TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1
TRUST is a decentralized AI auditing framework that decomposes reasoning into HDAGs, maps agent interactions via the DAAN protocol to CIGs, and uses stake-weighted multi-tier consensus to achieve 72.4% accuracy while ...
-
TSGuard: Automated User-Centric Incident Diagnosis for AI Workloads in the Cloud
TSGuard builds domain knowledge bases offline from historical incidents and applies online multi-agent structured reasoning to diagnose AI workload failures, delivering 19.8% higher accuracy and 63.4% lower verificati...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.