Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Balancing the Scales: Reinforcement Learning for Fair Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10629 v1 pith:LW55B75G submitted 2024-07-15 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CY

Balancing the Scales: Reinforcement Learning for Fair Classification

classification cs.LG cs.CLcs.CY
keywords biasclassificationlearningfairfairnessmethodsreinforcementreward
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Fairness in classification tasks has traditionally focused on bias removal from neural representations, but recent trends favor algorithmic methods that embed fairness into the training process. These methods steer models towards fair performance, preventing potential elimination of valuable information that arises from representation manipulation. Reinforcement Learning (RL), with its capacity for learning through interaction and adjusting reward functions to encourage desired behaviors, emerges as a promising tool in this domain. In this paper, we explore the usage of RL to address bias in imbalanced classification by scaling the reward function to mitigate bias. We employ the contextual multi-armed bandit framework and adapt three popular RL algorithms to suit our objectives, demonstrating a novel approach to mitigating bias.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-Modal Requirements Data-based Acceptance Criteria Generation using LLMs

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Multi-modal RAG (text plus UI screenshots) with reward-based polishing generates acceptance criteria from user stories that three industry experts rated near 4/5 on relevance, correctness, and understandability.