Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Trustworthiness in Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.15851 v2 pith:CDU7IFMK submitted 2024-07-03 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG
keywords medicalmodelsfoundationtrustworthinessimaginganalysisapplicationscurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of foundation models in medical imaging represents a significant leap toward enhancing diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment. However, the deployment of foundation models in healthcare necessitates a rigorous examination of their trustworthiness, encompassing privacy, robustness, reliability, explainability, and fairness. The current body of survey literature on foundation models in medical imaging reveals considerable gaps, particularly in the area of trustworthiness. Additionally, existing surveys on the trustworthiness of foundation models do not adequately address their specific variations and applications within the medical imaging domain. This survey aims to fill that gap by presenting a novel taxonomy of foundation models used in medical imaging and analyzing the key motivations for ensuring their trustworthiness. We review current research on foundation models in major medical imaging applications, focusing on segmentation, medical report generation, medical question and answering (Q\&A), and disease diagnosis. These areas are highlighted because they have seen a relatively mature and substantial number of foundation models compared to other applications. We focus on literature that discusses trustworthiness in medical image analysis manuscripts. We explore the complex challenges of building trustworthy foundation models for each application, summarizing current concerns and strategies for enhancing trustworthiness. Furthermore, we examine the potential of these models to revolutionize patient care. Our analysis underscores the imperative for advancing towards trustworthy AI in medical image analysis, advocating for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while ensuring ethical and equitable healthcare delivery.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leaderless Collective Motion in Affine Formation Control over the Complex Plane

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modifying Laplacian weights yields leaderless affine collective motion of planar robot swarms, with closed-form eigenvectors/eigenvalues designed via complex-plane analysis.

  2. KANEx: Translating Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks' Interpretability to Medical Explainability

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    KAN classification heads plus forward-pass KAN-Map heatmaps improve chest X-ray localization and VLM explanation metrics by about 10% over Grad-CAM on MIMIC-CXR hybrids.

  3. Federated Learning for Large Models in Medical Imaging: A Comprehensive Review

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of federated learning for medical imaging covers CT/MRI reconstruction and downstream diagnosis and segmentation, emphasizing non-IID data and privacy.

  4. UNICON: UNIfied CONtinual Learning for Medical Foundational Models

    eess.IV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    UNICON attaches task-specific adapters (LoRA, MLP, decoder, fusion) to a frozen CT foundation model, enabling continual extension to prognosis, segmentation, and PET scans.

Pith tools