Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Need for Guardrails with Large Language Models in Medical Safety-Critical Settings: An Artificial Intelligence Application in the Pharmacovigilance Ecosystem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.18322 v2 pith:PUAU4ZF4 submitted 2024-07-01 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.LG
keywords guardrailssafety-criticaldruglanguagellmsmedicalsafetyadverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are useful tools with the capacity for performing specific types of knowledge work at an effective scale. However, LLM deployments in high-risk and safety-critical domains pose unique challenges, notably the issue of ``hallucination,'' where LLMs can generate fabricated information. This is particularly concerning in settings such as drug safety, where inaccuracies could lead to patient harm. To mitigate these risks, we have developed and demonstrated a proof of concept suite of guardrails specifically designed to mitigate certain types of hallucinations and errors for drug safety, and potentially applicable to other medical safety-critical contexts. These guardrails include mechanisms to detect anomalous documents to prevent the ingestion of inappropriate data, identify incorrect drug names or adverse event terms, and convey uncertainty in generated content. We integrated these guardrails with an LLM fine-tuned for a text-to-text task, which involves converting both structured and unstructured data within adverse event reports into natural language. This method was applied to translate individual case safety reports, demonstrating effective application in a pharmacovigilance processing task. Our guardrail framework offers a set of tools with broad applicability across various domains, ensuring LLMs can be safely used in high-risk situations by eliminating the occurrence of key errors, including the generation of incorrect pharmacovigilance-related terms, thus adhering to stringent regulatory and quality standards in medical safety-critical environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Agents That Know When They Don't Know: Uncertainty as a Control Signal for Structured Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM agent using retrieval and summary uncertainty as training rewards and inference filters produces more factual, useful multi-omics summaries and better downstream survival predictions.

  2. A Systematic Analysis of Declining Medical Safety Messaging in Generative AI Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Medical disclaimers in LLM and VLM outputs declined sharply from 2022 to 2025, dropping from 26.3% to 0.97% for text questions and from 19.6% to 1.05% for images.

  3. Constrained Sliced Wasserstein Embedding

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding SWGG dissimilarity constraints to sliced Wasserstein embedding, trained via primal-dual optimization with a softsort relaxation, improves pooling accuracy on image, point cloud, and protein-sequence benchmarks.

Pith tools