Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

ADBM: Adversarial diffusion bridge model for reliable adversarial purification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.00315 v4 pith:VMG6DBXL submitted 2024-08-01 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

ADBM: Adversarial diffusion bridge model for reliable adversarial purification

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV
keywords adversarialpurificationadbmdiffusionbridgediffpureoriginaldata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently Diffusion-based Purification (DiffPure) has been recognized as an effective defense method against adversarial examples. However, we find DiffPure which directly employs the original pre-trained diffusion models for adversarial purification, to be suboptimal. This is due to an inherent trade-off between noise purification performance and data recovery quality. Additionally, the reliability of existing evaluations for DiffPure is questionable, as they rely on weak adaptive attacks. In this work, we propose a novel Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model, termed ADBM. ADBM directly constructs a reverse bridge from the diffused adversarial data back to its original clean examples, enhancing the purification capabilities of the original diffusion models. Through theoretical analysis and experimental validation across various scenarios, ADBM has proven to be a superior and robust defense mechanism, offering significant promise for practical applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Visual Inception: Compromising Long-term Planning in Agentic Recommenders via Multimodal Memory Poisoning

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Visual Inception poisons images to hijack long-term memory in agentic recommenders and steer planning, while CognitiveGuard reduces success to about 10% via perceptual sanitization and reasoning verification.

  2. Memory Efficient Full-gradient Attacks (MEFA) Framework for Adversarial Defense Evaluations

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MEFA enables exact full-gradient white-box attacks on iterative stochastic purification defenses like diffusion and Langevin EBMs by trading recomputation for lower memory, revealing vulnerabilities missed by approxim...

  3. Breaking the Illusion: Consensus-Based Generative Mitigation of Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddings

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Generative purification with consensus aggregation reduces adversarial illusion attack success rates to near zero on ImageBind while improving alignment on both clean and attacked inputs.

  4. Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety

    cs.CR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A comprehensive survey that taxonomizes safety threats to large models and agents, reviews defenses and benchmarks, and outlines open challenges.