REVIEW 2 cited by
Advances in Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Analysis: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Advances in Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Analysis: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions
read the original abstract
Whole slide images (WSIs) are gigapixel-scale digital images of H\&E-stained tissue samples widely used in pathology. The substantial size and complexity of WSIs pose unique analytical challenges. Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has emerged as a powerful approach for addressing these challenges, particularly in cancer classification and detection. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and methodologies associated with applying MIL to WSI analysis, including attention mechanisms, pseudo-labeling, transformers, pooling functions, and graph neural networks. Additionally, it explores the potential of MIL in discovering cancer cell morphology, constructing interpretable machine learning models, and quantifying cancer grading. By summarizing the current challenges, methodologies, and potential applications of MIL in WSI analysis, this survey aims to inform researchers about the state of the field and inspire future research directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Multi-Beholder: Biomarker Prediction for Low-Grade Glioma with Multiple Instance Learning and One-Class Classification
Multi-Beholder integrates one-class classification into multiple instance learning to predict LGG biomarker status from histopathology images, reporting AUCs of 0.973 on TCGA-LGG and 0.820 on an external Xiangya cohort.
-
Cluster-Level Sparse Multi-Instance Learning for Whole-Slide Images
csMIL adds K-means cluster sparsity to attention-based MIL, reporting CAMELYON16 AUC 0.951 and TCGA-NSCLC AUC 0.933, but with test-set-tuned hyperparameters and a borrowed Lasso bound.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.