REVIEW 8 cited by
ProteinGPT: Multimodal LLM for Protein Property Prediction and Structure Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ProteinGPT: Multimodal LLM for Protein Property Prediction and Structure Understanding
read the original abstract
Understanding biological processes, drug development, and biotechnological advancements requires a detailed analysis of protein structures and functions, a task that is inherently complex and time-consuming in traditional protein research. To streamline this process, we introduce ProteinGPT, a state-of-the-art multimodal large language model for proteins that enables users to upload protein sequences and/or structures for comprehensive analysis and responsive inquiries. ProteinGPT integrates protein sequence and structure encoders with linear projection layers to ensure precise representation adaptation and leverages a large language model (LLM) to generate accurate, contextually relevant responses. To train ProteinGPT, we constructed a large-scale dataset of 132,092 proteins, each annotated with 20-30 property tags and 5-10 QA pairs per protein, and optimized the instruction-tuning process using GPT-4o. Experiments demonstrate that ProteinGPT effectively generates informative responses to protein-related questions, achieving high performance on both semantic and lexical metrics and significantly outperforming baseline models and general-purpose LLMs in understanding and responding to protein-related queries. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/ProteinGPT/ProteinGPT.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
ProtStructQA: A Denotation Threshold in Protein Structural Reasoning
ProtStructQA is a new executable benchmark for protein structural QA that identifies a capability threshold between 1.7B and 4B parameter models where effective prompting strategies shift from tool use to chain-of-thought.
-
VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design
VibeProteinBench is a three-stage language-interfaced benchmark revealing that no current LLM performs strongly across recognition, engineering, and generation of proteins.
-
VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design
VibeProteinBench is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on open-ended language-interfaced protein design across recognition, engineering, and generation, with no model showing strong performance in all areas.
-
Unlocking Biological Workflows for Robust Protein-Text Question Answering: A Dual-Dimensional RAG Framework
2D-ProteinRAG is a dual-dimensional RAG framework that incorporates BLAST workflows plus horizontal attribute alignment and vertical homology denoising to improve protein-text QA on both in-distribution and out-of-dis...
-
GenoMAS: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Discovery via Code-Driven Gene Expression Analysis
GenoMAS deploys six specialized LLM agents with guided planning to preprocess transcriptomic data and identify genes, reaching 89.13% composite similarity and 60.48% F1 on the GenoTEX benchmark while outperforming pri...
-
STELLA: A Multimodal LLM for Protein Functional Annotation via Unified Sequence-Structure Encoding
STELLA aligns ESM3 bimodal sequence-structure encodings with Llama-3.1-8B text modeling to claim state-of-the-art results on protein functional description prediction and enzyme-catalyzed reaction prediction.
-
From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Reshaping Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines
LLMs accelerate research workflows from idea generation to writing but introduce challenges like hallucination, bias, opacity, and ten systemic risks requiring new governance frameworks.
-
From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Reshaping Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines
A cross-disciplinary review of 151 studies concludes LLMs accelerate research workflows while introducing recurring technical and ethical risks, including ten it flags as underexplored.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.