REVIEW 3 cited by
Configurable Foundation Models: Building LLMs from a Modular Perspective
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Configurable Foundation Models: Building LLMs from a Modular Perspective
read the original abstract
Advancements in LLMs have recently unveiled challenges tied to computational efficiency and continual scalability due to their requirements of huge parameters, making the applications and evolution of these models on devices with limited computation resources and scenarios requiring various abilities increasingly cumbersome. Inspired by modularity within the human brain, there is a growing tendency to decompose LLMs into numerous functional modules, allowing for inference with part of modules and dynamic assembly of modules to tackle complex tasks, such as mixture-of-experts. To highlight the inherent efficiency and composability of the modular approach, we coin the term brick to represent each functional module, designating the modularized structure as configurable foundation models. In this paper, we offer a comprehensive overview and investigation of the construction, utilization, and limitation of configurable foundation models. We first formalize modules into emergent bricks - functional neuron partitions that emerge during the pre-training phase, and customized bricks - bricks constructed via additional post-training to improve the capabilities and knowledge of LLMs. Based on diverse functional bricks, we further present four brick-oriented operations: retrieval and routing, merging, updating, and growing. These operations allow for dynamic configuration of LLMs based on instructions to handle complex tasks. To verify our perspective, we conduct an empirical analysis on widely-used LLMs. We find that the FFN layers follow modular patterns with functional specialization of neurons and functional neuron partitions. Finally, we highlight several open issues and directions for future research. Overall, this paper aims to offer a fresh modular perspective on existing LLM research and inspire the future creation of more efficient and scalable foundational models.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Language Models Need Sleep: Learning to Self-Modify and Consolidate Memories
Language models can use a two-stage sleep process of upward distillation for memory consolidation and RL-based dreaming for unsupervised self-improvement to enable continual learning.
-
Language Models Need Sleep: Learning to Self-Modify and Consolidate Memories
Sleep-time Knowledge Seeding plus Dreaming lets LLMs expand capacity, distill fragile in-context memories into stable parameters, and self-improve without human labels.
-
Modular Representation Compression: Adapting LLMs for Efficient and Effective Recommendations
LLMs exhibit mid-layer representation advantage for recommendations; MARC compresses representations modularly to reduce costs while improving performance, as shown in a large-scale online advertising deployment.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.