Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

RAC: Efficient LLM Factuality Correction with Retrieval Augmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15667 v1 pith:IHAEDQX7 submitted 2024-10-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

RAC: Efficient LLM Factuality Correction with Retrieval Augmentation

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords acrosscorrectionllmsfactualitylanguagemethodoutputretrieval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive results across a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet they can often produce factually incorrect outputs. This paper introduces a simple but effective low-latency post-correction method, \textbf{Retrieval Augmented Correction (RAC)}, aimed at enhancing the factual performance of LLMs without requiring additional fine-tuning. Our method is general and can be used with any instruction-tuned LLM, and has greatly reduced latency compared to prior approaches. RAC decomposes the LLM's output into atomic facts and applies a fine-grained verification and correction process with retrieved content to verify and correct the LLM-generated output. Our extensive experiments show that RAC yields up to 30\% improvements over state-of-the-art baselines across two popular factuality evaluation datasets, validating its efficacy and robustness in both with and without the integration of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) across different LLMs.\footnote{Our code is at \url{https://github.com/jlab-nlp/Retrieval-Augmented-Correction}}

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ArbGraph: Conflict-Aware Evidence Arbitration for Reliable Long-Form Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ArbGraph resolves conflicts in RAG evidence by constructing a conflict-aware graph of atomic claims and applying intensity-driven iterative arbitration to suppress unreliable claims prior to generation.

  2. U-Lens: Supporting User Uncertainty Management in Long-Form LLM Responses

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    U-Lens organizes long-form LLM uncertainty into prioritized multi-granular targets with evaluative explanations and response guidance, improving limited-budget verification over a confidence-cue baseline.