Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Literature Meets Data: A Synergistic Approach to Hypothesis Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17309 v3 pith:LLNNRSK3 submitted 2024-10-22 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords generationhypothesisdatadata-drivenhumanliterature-basedaloneapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI holds promise for transforming scientific processes, including hypothesis generation. Prior work on hypothesis generation can be broadly categorized into theory-driven and data-driven approaches. While both have proven effective in generating novel and plausible hypotheses, it remains an open question whether they can complement each other. To address this, we develop the first method that combines literature-based insights with data to perform LLM-powered hypothesis generation. We apply our method on five different datasets and demonstrate that integrating literature and data outperforms other baselines (8.97\% over few-shot, 15.75\% over literature-based alone, and 3.37\% over data-driven alone). Additionally, we conduct the first human evaluation to assess the utility of LLM-generated hypotheses in assisting human decision-making on two challenging tasks: deception detection and AI generated content detection. Our results show that human accuracy improves significantly by 7.44\% and 14.19\% on these tasks, respectively. These findings suggest that integrating literature-based and data-driven approaches provides a comprehensive and nuanced framework for hypothesis generation and could open new avenues for scientific inquiry.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simulating Tabular Datasets through LLMs to Rapidly Explore Hypotheses about Real-World Entities

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs can approximate tabular datasets about real-world entities well enough for rapid hypothesis exploration, and fidelity improves with model scale.

  2. LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review of LLM-based systems for hypothesis discovery, experiment planning, scientific writing, and peer review, including benchmarks, evaluation methods, and open challenges.

  3. On the Role of Model Prior in Real-World Inductive Reasoning

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMs' hypotheses for real-world classification tasks are driven mostly by task priors, and in-context demonstrations, even with flipped labels, do little to change them.

Pith tools