Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beware of Calibration Data for Pruning Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17711 v2 pith:7SRTF6K4 submitted 2024-10-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords datacalibrationpruninglargellmspost-trainingpre-trainingamount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

As large language models (LLMs) are widely applied across various fields, model compression has become increasingly crucial for reducing costs and improving inference efficiency. Post-training pruning is a promising method that does not require resource-intensive iterative training and only needs a small amount of calibration data to assess the importance of parameters. Recent research has enhanced post-training pruning from different aspects but few of them systematically explore the effects of calibration data, and it is unclear if there exist better calibration data construction strategies. We fill this blank and surprisingly observe that calibration data is also crucial to post-training pruning, especially for high sparsity. Through controlled experiments on important influence factors of calibration data, including the pruning settings, the amount of data, and its similarity with pre-training data, we observe that a small size of data is adequate, and more similar data to its pre-training stage can yield better performance. As pre-training data is usually inaccessible for advanced LLMs, we further provide a self-generating calibration data synthesis strategy to construct feasible calibration data. Experimental results on recent strong open-source LLMs (e.g., DCLM, and LLaMA-3) show that the proposed strategy can enhance the performance of strong pruning methods (e.g., Wanda, DSnoT, OWL) by a large margin (up to $2.68\%$). Code is available at https://github.com/Dereck0602/calibration_data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LUQ: Layerwise Ultra-Low Bit Quantization for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LUQ assigns ultra-low bit widths to transformer layers whose output activations have low entropy, cutting multimodal LLM memory by up to 40 percent with modest benchmark loss.

  2. Pruning Weights but Not Truth: Safeguarding Truthfulness While Pruning LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM pruning damages the internal features used to detect false statements; the proposed TPLO method reallocates sparsity to protect them, though the measured improvements are modest and potentially confounded by leaka...

Pith tools