REVIEW 12 cited by
Centaur: a foundation model of human cognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Centaur: a foundation model of human cognition
read the original abstract
Establishing a unified theory of cognition has been a major goal of psychology. While there have been previous attempts to instantiate such theories by building computational models, we currently do not have one model that captures the human mind in its entirety. A first step in this direction is to create a model that can predict human behavior in a wide range of settings. Here we introduce Centaur, a computational model that can predict and simulate human behavior in any experiment expressible in natural language. We derived Centaur by finetuning a state-of-the-art language model on a novel, large-scale data set called Psych-101. Psych-101 reaches an unprecedented scale, covering trial-by-trial data from over 60,000 participants performing over 10,000,000 choices in 160 experiments. Centaur not only captures the behavior of held-out participants better than existing cognitive models, but also generalizes to new cover stories, structural task modifications, and entirely new domains. Furthermore, we find that the model's internal representations become more aligned with human neural activity after finetuning. Taken together, our results demonstrate that it is possible to discover computational models that capture human behavior across a wide range of domains. We believe that such models provide tremendous potential for guiding the development of cognitive theories and present a case study to demonstrate this.
Forward citations
Cited by 12 Pith papers
-
DRACULA: Hunting for the Actions Users Want Deep Research Agents to Execute
DRACULA is the first dataset of user feedback on intermediate actions for deep research agents, showing that LLMs predict preferred actions better with full user history and that history-based action generation leads ...
-
BehaviorBench: Benchmarking Foundation Models for Behavioral Science Tasks
BehaviorBench is a benchmark for foundation models on behavioral tasks that reveals fine-tuned behavioral models outperform general models on distributional alignment while general models lead on individual-level accuracy.
-
Voluntary Collusion with Secret Tools in Competing LLM Agents
LLM agents voluntarily adopt secret collusion tools in competitive multi-agent games despite explicit unfairness labels, and only explicit ethical framing reduces adoption rates.
-
Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions
A genetic algorithm optimizes weighted combinations of LLM-perceived harm mitigation, expert costs, and participatory scores over stakeholder-action pairs to surface viable AI policy packages for media harms.
-
Computational models of pragmatic reasoning with flexible generation of meaning and expression alternatives
Combining language-model generation with rule-based selection reproduces several pragmatic phenomena, but the language models only worked reliably as idea generators, not as judges of formal linguistic properties.
-
Mixture of Cognitive Experts in Large Vision-Language Models
Routing CV experts into atomic evidence then Bloom-staged verbalization improves LVLM benchmarks and yields measurable query-conditioned reasoning traces.
-
Can Vision Language Models Learn Intuitive Physics from Interaction?
Training VLMs through interaction (GRPO) does not yield generalizable physical intuitions beyond within-task performance, matching—not exceeding—supervised fine-tuning.
-
Architecture-Sensitive Supervised Fine-Tuning for Screen-Conditioned Action Prediction: A PiSAR Benchmark
Fine-tuned Qwen3-VL-8B reaches sem_sim 0.783 on PiSAR held-out set vs 0.46-0.48 for frontier zero-shot, while Gemma-4-26B scores 0.441.
-
The $\textit{Silicon Society}$ Cookbook: Design Space of LLM-based Social Simulations
The base LLM choice dominates simulation outcomes in LLM-based social networks, while other design parameters show either additive or complex interactive effects.
-
Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions
A genetic algorithm exploring billions of policy combinations, scored by LLM-evaluated harm mitigation, expert cost, and participatory ratings, identifies viable AI policy options under different weighting schemes.
-
Understanding Task Representations in Neural Networks via Bayesian Ablation
A Bayesian ablation framework combined with information-theoretic metrics is introduced to analyze causal roles, distributedness, manifold complexity, and polysemanticity of task representations in neural networks.
-
Large-Scale AI and Foundation Models for Neuroscience: A Comprehensive Review
This paper is a survey: it organizes existing foundation-model work in neuroscience into five application domains and lists public datasets, without presenting new experiments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.