Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

RuAG: Learned-rule-augmented Generation for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03349 v1 pith:4YUACHU5 submitted 2024-11-04 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

RuAG: Learned-rule-augmented Generation for Large Language Models

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG
keywords llmslanguagelogicreasoningruagrulestasksautomatically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In-context learning (ICL) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have gained attention for their ability to enhance LLMs' reasoning by incorporating external knowledge but suffer from limited contextual window size, leading to insufficient information injection. To this end, we propose a novel framework, RuAG, to automatically distill large volumes of offline data into interpretable first-order logic rules, which are injected into LLMs to boost their reasoning capabilities. Our method begins by formulating the search process relying on LLMs' commonsense, where LLMs automatically define head and body predicates. Then, RuAG applies Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to address the combinational searching space and efficiently discover logic rules from data. The resulting logic rules are translated into natural language, allowing targeted knowledge injection and seamless integration into LLM prompts for LLM's downstream task reasoning. We evaluate our framework on public and private industrial tasks, including natural language processing, time-series, decision-making, and industrial tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing LLM's capability over diverse tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RIMRULE: Improving Tool-Using Language Agents via MDL-Guided Rule Learning

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    RIMRULE distills LLM tool-use failures into MDL-compressed symbolic rules that, when injected at inference, improve tool-calling accuracy and transfer across models.

  2. RLIE: Rule Generation with Logistic Regression, Iterative Refinement, and Evaluation for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Logistic regression over LLM-generated natural-language rules outperformed letting the LLM reason with those rules on six binary text tasks.

  3. Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Survey

    cs.AI 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey consolidating frameworks, data practices, large action models, benchmarks, applications, and research gaps in LLM-brained GUI agents.