REVIEW 1 cited by
Revisiting the Robustness of Watermarking to Paraphrasing Attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Revisiting the Robustness of Watermarking to Paraphrasing Attacks
read the original abstract
Amidst rising concerns about the internet being proliferated with content generated from language models (LMs), watermarking is seen as a principled way to certify whether text was generated from a model. Many recent watermarking techniques slightly modify the output probabilities of LMs to embed a signal in the generated output that can later be detected. Since early proposals for text watermarking, questions about their robustness to paraphrasing have been prominently discussed. Lately, some techniques are deliberately designed and claimed to be robust to paraphrasing. However, such watermarking schemes do not adequately account for the ease with which they can be reverse-engineered. We show that with access to only a limited number of generations from a black-box watermarked model, we can drastically increase the effectiveness of paraphrasing attacks to evade watermark detection, thereby rendering the watermark ineffective.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
GoCoMA: Hyperbolic Multimodal Representation Fusion for Large Language Model-Generated Code Attribution
GoCoMA fuses code stylometry and binary artifact images via hyperbolic Poincaré ball projection and geodesic-cosine attention to attribute LLM-generated code, outperforming baselines on CoDET-M4 and LLMAuthorBench.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.