Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Aioli: A Unified Optimization Framework for Language Model Data Mixing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.05735 v2 pith:PALPQJYT submitted 2024-11-08 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML
keywords mixingproportionsexistingmethodsaioliperformancetrainingaverage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language model performance depends on identifying the optimal mixture of data groups to train on (e.g., law, code, math). Prior work has proposed a diverse set of methods to efficiently learn mixture proportions, ranging from fitting regression models over training runs to dynamically updating proportions throughout training. Surprisingly, we find that no existing method consistently outperforms a simple stratified sampling baseline in terms of average test perplexity. To understand this inconsistency, we unify existing methods into a standard framework, showing they are equivalent to solving a common optimization problem: minimize average loss subject to a method-specific mixing law -- an implicit assumption on the relationship between loss and mixture proportions. This framework suggests that measuring the fidelity of a method's mixing law can offer insights into its performance. Empirically, we find that existing methods set their mixing law parameters inaccurately, resulting in the inconsistent mixing performance we observe. Using this insight, we derive a new online method named Aioli, which directly estimates the mixing law parameters throughout training and uses them to dynamically adjust proportions. Aioli outperforms stratified sampling on 6 out of 6 datasets by an average of 0.27 test perplexity points, whereas existing methods fail to consistently beat stratified sampling, doing up to 6.9 points worse. Moreover, in a practical setting where proportions are learned on shorter runs due to computational constraints, Aioli can dynamically adjust these proportions over the full training run, consistently improving performance over existing methods by up to 12.012 test perplexity points.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Domain-Aware Scaling Laws Uncover Data Synergy

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Domain-aware scaling laws with fitted γ and σ synergy terms recover stable code-math interactions from observational LLM mixtures and correctly predict mixture rankings in controlled small-scale trainings.

  2. Language Models Improve When Pretraining Data Matches Target Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ranking pretraining documents by similarity to benchmark training examples (BETR) yields consistent benchmark gains and a 2.1x compute multiplier over DCLM-Baseline.

  3. Organize the Web: Constructing Domains Enhances Pre-Training Data Curation

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Organizing web pretraining text into topic and format domains and reweighting those domains improves 1B-scale language model benchmarks, and combining the reweighting with quality filters yields further gains.

  4. Rethinking Data Mixture for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey and New Perspectives

    cs.CL 2025-05 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey organizing LLM data mixture methods into offline and online families, with a fine-grained taxonomy based on optimization frameworks.

Pith tools