pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.07476 · v4 · submitted 2024-11-12 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

A rich structure of renormalization group flows for Higgs-like models in 4 dimensions

Andr\'e LeClair This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords renormalization groupHiggs doubletsSU(2)cyclic flowsRussian Doll scalingfermion familiesKoide formulapseudo-hermitian
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupled Higgs doublets under SU(2) generate cyclic RG flows that explain three fermion families via Russian Doll scaling of VEVs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines two coupled Higgs doublets transforming under SU(2) and builds marginal operators using the SU(2) Lie algebra to produce renormalization group flows that include cyclic behavior. These flows lead to spontaneous symmetry breaking with vacuum expectation values that scale exponentially in multiples of the RG period λ, known as Russian Doll scaling. If the cyclic flow operates from high energies down to the electroweak scale, three full cycles account for the three families of quarks and leptons, with λ constrained to approximately π/2 by the Koide mass relation. This setup also renders the model unitary below the particle-antiparticle threshold despite being pseudo-hermitian overall. A reader would care because it offers a dynamical explanation for both the hierarchy of scales and the replication of fermion generations without additional fields.

Core claim

By constructing marginal operators that obey an operator product expansion derived from the SU(2) algebra, the model of two Higgs doublets yields cyclic renormalization group flows with an invariant period λ. Spontaneous symmetry breaking of SU(2) to U(1) produces an infinite sequence of vacuum expectation values satisfying Russian Doll scaling v_n proportional to the exponential of 2nλ. The resulting structure implies that three completed RG cycles up to the electroweak scale correspond to three families of fermions, with the period λ most tightly constrained by the Koide formula to be approximately π/2.

What carries the argument

The cyclic renormalization group flow arising from SU(2)-based marginal operators, which enforces Russian Doll scaling on the vacuum expectation values after spontaneous symmetry breaking.

Load-bearing premise

The cyclic RG flow constructed from the SU(2) marginal operators must persist without interruption from the ultraviolet down to the electroweak scale, with each completed cycle directly corresponding to one fermion family.

What would settle it

A direct measurement or lattice simulation showing that the vacuum expectation values do not follow the exponential Russian Doll pattern with period near π/2, or the discovery of a fourth generation of fermions below the electroweak scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.07476 by Andr\'e LeClair.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Russian Doll craftmanship representing 10 families for 10 RG cycles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: RG flows based on the beta-function (75). RG trajectories are hyperbolas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Fit to quark masses (106). The red dots are the known physical masses. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Fit to lepton masses (107). The red dots are the known physical masses. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider $2$ coupled Higgs doublets which transform in the usual way under SU(2). By constructing marginal operators which satisfy an operator product expansion based on the SU(2) Lie algebra, we can obtain a rich pattern of renormalization group (RG) flows which includes lines of fixed points and more interestingly, cyclic RG flows which are unavoidable in this model. The hamiltonian is pseudo-hermitian, $H^\dagger = {\cal K} H {\cal K}^\dagger $ with ${\cal K}$ unitary satisfying ${\cal K}^2 =1$, thus the model is non-unitary. The hamiltonian still has real eigenvalues, but the non-unitarity is manifested in negative norm states. Based on a generalized optical theorem for pseudo-hermitian hamiltonians, we show that our model is in fact unitary below the threshold for particle/anti-particle pair production. It is thus unitary in the non-relativistic limit, which opens up some potential applications to condensed matter physics. We argue that our model breaks ${\cal C}{\cal P}$ symmetry. Upon spontaneous symmetry breaking, the Higgs-like fields have an infinite number of vacuum expectation values $v_n$ which satisfy ``Russian Doll" scaling $v_n \sim e^{2 n \lambda}$ where $n=1,2,3,\ldots$ and $\lambda$ is the period of one RG cycle which is an RG invariant. We speculate that this Russian Doll RG flow can perhaps resolve the so-called hierarchy problem and may shed light on the origin of ``families" in the Standard Model of particle physics. If after spontaneous symmetry breaking of the SU(2) to U(1) a cyclic RG with period $\lambda$ is operative up to the electro-weak scale, then this admits 3 RG cycles, i.e. 3 families of quarks and leptons. The strongest constraints on the RG period $\lambda$ comes from the phenomenological Koide formula, wherein $\lambda \approx \pi/2$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a model of two SU(2) Higgs doublets together with marginal operators obeying an SU(2) Lie-algebra OPE. This is asserted to produce cyclic RG flows with invariant period λ, an infinite tower of VEVs obeying Russian-Doll scaling v_n ∼ e^{2nλ}, and a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian that remains unitary below the pair-production threshold. The authors further claim that, after SU(2)→U(1) breaking, the cyclic flow up to the electroweak scale admits exactly three RG cycles and therefore three fermion families, with the numerical value λ≈π/2 fixed by the Koide mass relation.

Significance. A rigorously derived example of cyclic RG flow in a four-dimensional scalar theory would be of technical interest for the study of non-perturbative renormalization-group trajectories. The claimed unitarity below threshold and possible condensed-matter applications are noted. However, the manuscript supplies no fermion fields, Yukawa couplings or generation structure, so the identification of RG-cycle count with the number of Standard-Model families is an external postulate rather than a derived result; this substantially reduces the significance of the work for high-energy physics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that a cyclic RG with period λ 'admits 3 RG cycles, i.e. 3 families of quarks and leptons' is not supported by any calculation within the model, which contains neither fermion fields nor Yukawa interactions. The mapping from cycle count to replicated generations is therefore an external postulate, not an output of the RG or spontaneous-symmetry-breaking analysis.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and section on spontaneous symmetry breaking: the period λ is fixed by requiring consistency with the external Koide mass formula; the conclusion that exactly three families appear therefore reduces, by the paper's own logic, to a post-hoc matching of the fitted λ to the observed number of generations rather than a dynamical prediction of the constructed theory.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: although the existence of cyclic flows and the scaling v_n ∼ e^{2nλ} is asserted, the manuscript supplies neither the explicit beta functions nor the OPE coefficients that would allow an independent verification of these statements.
minor comments (1)
  1. The definition and properties of the unitary operator K appearing in the pseudo-Hermitian relation H† = K H K† should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than left implicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying points where the manuscript's claims require clarification. The core technical results concern the construction of marginal operators obeying an SU(2) Lie-algebra OPE in a two-doublet scalar theory, the resulting cyclic RG trajectories, the pseudo-Hermitian unitarity below threshold, and the Russian-Doll VEV spectrum. The connection to three fermion families is presented as a speculation, not a derived result. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that a cyclic RG with period λ 'admits 3 RG cycles, i.e. 3 families of quarks and leptons' is not supported by any calculation within the model, which contains neither fermion fields nor Yukawa interactions. The mapping from cycle count to replicated generations is therefore an external postulate, not an output of the RG or spontaneous-symmetry-breaking analysis.

    Authors: We agree. The model contains only scalar fields; no fermions or Yukawa couplings are introduced, so the identification of RG-cycle count with the number of generations is an external postulate motivated by the Russian-Doll VEV pattern. We will revise the abstract and the relevant discussion to state explicitly that the link to three families is a speculation that would require extending the model with fermions, rather than a direct output of the present calculation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and section on spontaneous symmetry breaking: the period λ is fixed by requiring consistency with the external Koide mass formula; the conclusion that exactly three families appear therefore reduces, by the paper's own logic, to a post-hoc matching of the fitted λ to the observed number of generations rather than a dynamical prediction of the constructed theory.

    Authors: The cyclic RG flow, the invariant period λ, and the exponential VEV scaling v_n ∼ e^{2nλ} are derived from the RG equations of the scalar sector alone. The numerical value λ ≈ π/2 is indeed obtained by matching to the external Koide relation so that three cycles fit between the Planck and electroweak scales. We will rephrase the text to present this as a consistency check that suggests a possible dynamical origin for three generations once fermions are added, rather than as a prediction internal to the scalar model. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: although the existence of cyclic flows and the scaling v_n ∼ e^{2nλ} is asserted, the manuscript supplies neither the explicit beta functions nor the OPE coefficients that would allow an independent verification of these statements.

    Authors: The beta functions follow from the assumed SU(2)-based OPE for the marginal operators; the cyclic solutions are obtained by integrating the resulting autonomous system. To permit independent verification we will add an appendix containing the explicit beta functions, the OPE coefficients, and the step-by-step integration that yields the periodic flow and the Russian-Doll spectrum. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the RG derivation chain.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation constructs marginal operators from the SU(2) Lie algebra OPE for two Higgs doublets, yielding cyclic RG flows and Russian Doll VEVs v_n ~ e^{2nλ} as direct outputs of the RG equations and spontaneous symmetry breaking analysis. These steps are self-contained within the model's Hamiltonian and do not reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations. The mapping of cycle count to three fermion families is explicitly framed as speculation ('we speculate... may shed light on the origin of families' and 'If ... then this admits 3 RG cycles, i.e. 3 families'), with λ constrained by the external Koide formula rather than derived internally. No load-bearing step equates cycles to families by construction or renames a known result; the family interpretation remains an unproven conjecture outside the RG analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence of marginal operators obeying an SU(2) Lie-algebra OPE, the persistence of cyclic flow across many decades of scale, the identification of cycle count with family number, and the use of the Koide relation to fix the period; each of these is introduced without independent derivation or external benchmark in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • RG period λ
    Introduced as the period of one RG cycle and fixed numerically by matching to the Koide formula; no first-principles calculation of its value is supplied.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Marginal operators can be constructed that satisfy an operator product expansion based on the SU(2) Lie algebra
    Stated as the starting point for obtaining the rich pattern of RG flows; no explicit construction or proof of closure is given in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian remains unitary below the particle-antiparticle threshold
    Invoked via a generalized optical theorem; the theorem itself is not derived here.
invented entities (1)
  • Russian Doll tower of vacuum expectation values v_n no independent evidence
    purpose: To generate an infinite discrete set of scales from the cyclic RG flow after spontaneous symmetry breaking
    Postulated as a consequence of the cyclic flow; no independent evidence or collider signature is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5901 in / 2050 out tokens · 56213 ms · 2026-05-23T18:01:18.051121+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-perturbative renormalization group for pseudo-hermitian scalar fields in 4D

    hep-th 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The pseudo-hermitian scalar model exhibits a line of non-unitary 4D fixed points, massless flows between them, and cyclic RG flows, supported by three-loop beta functions and an all-order conjecture.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Fully anisotropic case 10

    work page

  2. [2]

    Fully isotropic case 11

    work page

  3. [3]

    A rich structure of renormalization group flows for Higgs-like models in 4 dimensions

    SU(2) broken to U(1) 12 V. Nested Russian Dolls as a signature of a cyclic RG flow in the 2D case 13 A. General properties: Infinite spectrum of resonances with Russian Doll scaling behavior 14 B. Trigonometric case: Cyclic sine-Gordon model 14 C. Elliptic examples and SL(2 , Z) 15 VI. Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking: Infinite number of VEV’s with Russian D...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    families

    classified on the basis of the Virasoro algebra. In fact, there are many more non-unitary theories than unitary ones in this classification. As we explain below, the operator K allows one to project onto positive norm states and the resulting model has a unitary time evolution with positive probabilities on this projected Hilbert space. 3 Projection onto ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    We take them to also satisfy constraints such as in (9)

    (11) Let us also review the standard parity P and time-reversal symmetry T . We take them to also satisfy constraints such as in (9). Since parity flips the sign of momentum: Pa±(k)P = a±(−k), Pa† ±(k)P = a† ±(−k), =⇒ P Φ(t, x)P = Φ(t, −x), PH0P = H0. (12) Time-reversal also flips the sign of k and only differs from P in that it is anti-unitary, namely T ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    scaling fields

    (15) Comparing with (14), we can interpret the operators a† ± as creating states that are even or odd under PT . The operator K does not act locally on the fields Φ, unlike C, P, T . Let also point out that the operator K can be expressed in terms of the U(1) charge h operator, although at this stage it’s not clear this is necessary. In any case, one has ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    We chose the 2 × 2 matrices τ a to be the hermitian Pauli matrices: τ a = σa, σ 1 = 0 1 1 0 , σ 2 = 0 −i i 0 , σ 3 = 1 0 0 −1 , Tr(τ aτ b) = 2δab

    Fully anisotropic case We now return to the case where the fields Φ i, eΦi, i = 1, 2 transform in the fundamental representation of SU (2). We chose the 2 × 2 matrices τ a to be the hermitian Pauli matrices: τ a = σa, σ 1 = 0 1 1 0 , σ 2 = 0 −i i 0 , σ 3 = 1 0 0 −1 , Tr(τ aτ b) = 2δab. (60) We are mainly interested in the case where the SU(2) is broken to...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (66) Using two RG invariants one can reduce the RG flow to that of a single coupling, for example g3, where βg3 is a function of g3 and the RG invariants Q1, Q2

    (65) However they are not all independent: Q1 + Q2 + Q3 = 0. (66) Using two RG invariants one can reduce the RG flow to that of a single coupling, for example g3, where βg3 is a function of g3 and the RG invariants Q1, Q2. Integrating the flow, g3(ℓ) can be expressed in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions [7], 9 which are generally doubly periodic and exhi...

    work page

  9. [9]

    (67) The J a,eJ a transform as the adjoint of SU(2) and the above field is built on the quadratic Casimir and thus SU (2) invariant

    Fully isotropic case For the fully isotropic case, g1 = g2 = g3 ≡ g, the perturbation is 3X a=1 gaOa = g 2 3X a=1 J aeJ a. (67) The J a,eJ a transform as the adjoint of SU(2) and the above field is built on the quadratic Casimir and thus SU (2) invariant. The above beta function (63) leads to βg = g2. (68) Thus for g > 0 the perturbation is marginally rel...

    work page

  10. [10]

    A simpler and potentially more physically interesting case is to break the SU(2) symmetry to U(1) ⊂ SU(2)

    SU(2) broken to U(1) The above fully anisotropic case is rather complicated even for 2D current-current perturbations (see further remarks in Section V where we review how the fully anisotropic case leads to S-matrices expressed in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions). A simpler and potentially more physically interesting case is to break the SU(2) symmetr...

    work page

  11. [11]

    (75) There is now only a single RG invariant: Q = g2 1 − g2

    work page

  12. [12]

    d/wgdrFN5ENQvn3C3JpDf9qqjU4=

    (76) The RG flow trajectories are thus hyperbolas Q = constant, as shown in Figure 2, where g1 = 0 represents a line of fixed points.10 Along the SU(2) symmetric separatrices g1 = ±g3, one has a single fixed point g1 = g3 in the UV or IR. Just below the separatrix, flows either begin or terminate along the line of fixed points g1 = 0, where g3 > 0 is marg...

    work page

  13. [13]

    7GepxnctEiJTZMrX/x8W1nBcUSo=

    It cannot be predicted at this stage but can in principle be inferred from experimental data if a cyclic RG is indeed operative. Roughly speaking, if the coupling g1 is of order 1 then λ ∼ π, and as we will see below this is roughly consistent with data on masses of families. Let us make some crude checks of the above idea based on the known data on quark...

    work page

  14. [14]

    Renormalization Group and Strong Interactions

    K. G. Wilson, “Renormalization Group and Strong Interactions”, Phys. Rev. D3 (1971) 1818

    work page 1971

  15. [15]

    Wilczek, QCD and asymptotic freedom: Perspectives and prospects, International Journal of Modern Physics A 8.08 (1993): 1359

    F. Wilczek, QCD and asymptotic freedom: Perspectives and prospects, International Journal of Modern Physics A 8.08 (1993): 1359

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    D. J. Gross, The discovery of asymptotic freedom and the emergence of QCD, International Journal of Modern Physics A 20.25 (2005): 5717

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    S. D. Glazek and K. G. Wilson, Limit cycles in quantum theories, Phys.Rev.Lett. 89 (2002) 230401

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    S. D. Glazek and K. G. Wilson, Universality, marginal operators, and limit cycles, Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 094304

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    P. F. Bedaque, H.-W. Hammer, and U. van Kolck, Renormalization of the Three-Body System with Short-Range Interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 463; arXiv:nucl-th/9809025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  20. [20]

    Renormalization group limit-cycles and field theories for elliptic S-matrices

    A. LeClair and G. Sierra, Renormalization group limit-cycles and field theories for elliptic S-matrices, J.Stat.Mech.0408:P08004 (2004); arXiv:hep-th/0403178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Universality in Few-body Systems with Large Scattering Length

    E. Braaten and H. W. Hammer, Universality in few-body problems with large scattering length, Physics Reports 428.5-6 (2006): 259-390; arXiv:cond-mat/0410417

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [22]

    Strong-weak coupling duality in anisotropic current interactions

    D. Bernard and A. LeClair, Strong-weak coupling duality in anisotropic current interactions, Phys.Lett. B512 (2001) 78; hep-th/0103096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  23. [23]

    On the Beta Function for Anisotropic Current Interactions in 2D

    B. Gerganov, A. LeClair and M. Moriconi, On the Beta Function for Anisotropic Current Interactions in 2D, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 4753; hep-th/0011189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  24. [24]

    Russian Doll Renormalization Group and Superconductivity

    A. LeClair, J.-M. Roman and G. Sierra, Russian Doll Renormalization Group and Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B69 (2004) 20505, arXiv:cond-mat/0211338

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    Russian Doll Renormalization Group, Kosterlitz-Thouless Flows, and the Cyclic sine-Gordon model

    A. LeClair, J.M. Roman and G. Sierra, Russian Doll Renormalization Group and Kosterlitz-Thouless Flows, Nucl.Phys. B675 (2003) 584, hep-th/0301042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  26. [26]

    Log-periodic behavior of finite size effects in field theories with RG limit cycles

    A. LeClair, J.M. Roman and G. Sierra, Log periodic behavior of finite size effects in field theories with RG limit cycles, Nucl.Phys. B700 (2004) 407; hep-th/0312141

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    Pauli, On Dirac’s new method of field quantization, Rev

    W. Pauli, On Dirac’s new method of field quantization, Rev. Mod. Phys. 15 (1943) 175

    work page 1943

  28. [28]

    Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 7.07 (2010): 1191

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 7.07 (2010): 1191

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, Journal of Mathematical Physics 43.1 (2002): 205

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    Pseudo-Hermiticity for a Class of Nondiagonalizable Hamiltonians

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity for a class of nondiagonalizable Hamiltonians, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 205; arXiv:math-ph/0207009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  31. [31]

    Belavin, A

    A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. Zamolodchikov, Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, Nucl.Phys. B241 (1984) 333

    work page 1984

  32. [32]

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. A. Fateev, Four Point Correlation Functions and the Operator Algebra in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories with the Central Charge c < 1, Nucl. Phys. B 251 (1985) 691

    work page 1985

  33. [33]

    Bernard and G

    D. Bernard and G. Felder, Fock representations and BRST cohomology in SL(2) current algebra, Communications in Mathematical Physics 127 (1990): 145

    work page 1990

  34. [34]

    Bernard and A

    D. Bernard and A. LeClair, A Classification of Non-Hermitian Random Matrices, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Statistical Field Theories, Como (Italy), June 2001, ISBN 978-1-4020-0761-3; arXiv:cond- mat/0110649

    work page arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems

    F. Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. I, J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962) 140

    work page 1962

  36. [36]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 1142

    work page 1997

  37. [37]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Renormalization group and perturbation theory about fixed points in two-dimensional field theory, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46 (1987) 1090

    work page 1987

  38. [38]

    Cardy, Is There a c-theorem in Four-Dimensions?, Phys

    J. Cardy, Is There a c-theorem in Four-Dimensions?, Phys. Lett. B 215 (1988) 749

    work page 1988

  39. [39]

    Osborn, Derivation of a four-dimensional c-theorem, Phys.Lett

    H. Osborn, Derivation of a four-dimensional c-theorem, Phys.Lett. B222, 97 (1989)

    work page 1989

  40. [40]

    Jack and H

    I. Jack and H. Osborn, Analogs of the c-theorem for four-dimensional renormalisable field theories, Nuclear Physics B 343.3 (1990): 647

    work page 1990

  41. [41]

    On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions

    Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions, JHEP 1112, 099 (2011), arXiv:1107.3987

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    Komargodski, The constraints of conformal symmetry on RG flows, JHEP 07 (2012) 069

    Z. Komargodski, The constraints of conformal symmetry on RG flows, JHEP 07 (2012) 069

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    M. A. Luty, J. Polchinski and R. Rattazzi, The a-theorem and the Asymptotics of 4D Quantum Field Theory, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013.1 (2013): 1

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Limit Cycles in Four Dimensions

    J.-F. Fortin, B. Grinstein, and A. Stergiou, Limit Cycles in Four Dimensions, JHEP 12 (2012) 112, arXiv:1206.2921. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    C. B. Jepsen, I. R. Klebanov and F. K. Popov, Rg limit cycles and unconventional fixed points in perturbative qft, Physical Review D103 (2021) 046015

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Lencs´ es, A

    M. Lencs´ es, A. Miscioscia, G. Mussardo, and G. Tak´ acs, Ginzburg-Landau description for multicritical Yang-Lee models, JHEP 08 (2024) 224, arXiv:2404.06100

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Tanaka and Y

    T. Tanaka and Y. Nakayama, Infinitely many new renormalization group flows between Virasoro minimal models from non-invertible symmetries, arXiv:2407.21353

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Katsevich, I

    A. Katsevich, I. R. Klebanov and Z. Sun, Ginzburg-Landau description of a class of non-unitary minimal models, arXiv:2410.11714

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Ambrosino and S

    F. Ambrosino and S. Negro, Minimal Models RG flows: non-invertible symmetries and non-perturbative description, arXiv:2501.07511

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon and F. Ravanini, Irreversibility of the renormalization group flow in non-unitary quantum field theory, J. Phys. A 50, 424002 (2017); arXiv:1706.01871

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

    M. Peskin and D. Schroeder, “An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory”, Addison-Wesley, 1995

    work page 1995

  52. [52]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rept.Prog.Phys.70 (2007) 947; arXiv: hep-th/0703096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  53. [53]

    Semi-Lorentz invariance, unitarity, and critical exponents of symplectic fermion models

    A. LeClair and M. Neubert, Semi-Lorentz invariance, unitarity, and critical exponents of symplectic fermion models, JHEP 0710:027 (2007); arXiv:0705.4657 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Bai, T.-L

    Y. Bai, T.-L. Feng, S. Kim, C.Y. Lee, L.-H. Liu, W. Zhao, S. Zhou, Correlators for pseudo Hermitian systems (2024), arXiv:2408.07506 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Monopole Condensation, And Confinement In N=2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Monopole Condensation, And Confinement In N=2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Nucl.Phys. B426 (1994) 19; Erratum-ibid. B430 (1994) 485; hep-th/9407087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  56. [56]

    D. I. Olive, Unitarity and the evaluation of discontinuities, Nuovo Cimento 26 (1962) 73

    work page 1962

  57. [57]

    Eden, P.V

    R.J. Eden, P.V. Landshoff, D.I. Olive and J.C. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix, Cambridge Univ. Press (1966)

    work page 1966

  58. [58]

    J. L. Miramontes, Hermitian analyticity verses Real analyticity in two-dimensional factorised S-matrices, Physics Letters B 455 (1999) 231; arXiv:hep-th/9901145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  59. [59]

    J. L. Miramontes and C. R. Fern´ andez-Pousa, ‘Integrable quantum field theories with unstable particles, Phys. Lett. B472 (2000) 392, hep-th/9910218

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  60. [60]

    Integrable scattering theories with unstable particles

    O.A. Castro-Alvaredo, J. Dreissig and A. Fring, Integrable scattering theories with unstable particles, The European Phys- ical Journal C-Particles and Fields 35 (2004) 393; hep-th/0211168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  61. [61]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and Al. B. Zamolodchikov, Factorized S-matrices in Two Dimensions as the Exact Solutions of Certain Relativistic Quantum Field Theory Models, Annals of Phys. 120, 253 (1979)

    work page 1979

  62. [62]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Z4-symmetric factorized S-matrix in two space-time dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 69 (1979) 165

    work page 1979

  63. [63]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press (1982)

    work page 1982

  64. [64]

    A. A. Belavin, Dynamical Yang-Baxter equation and quantum algebra associated with the elliptic curve, Nuclear Physics B 180 (1981), 189

    work page 1981

  65. [65]

    Mussardo and S

    G. Mussardo and S. Penati, A quantum field theory with infinite resonance states, Nucl. Phys. B567 (2000) 454, hep- th/9907039

    work page arXiv 2000

  66. [66]

    D. J. Gross and R. Jackiw, Effect of anomalies on quasi-renormalizable theories, Physical Review D, 6(4), (1972) 477

    work page 1972

  67. [67]

    Bonora and S

    L. Bonora and S. G. Giaccari, Something Anomalies can tell about SM and Gravity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07470 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Motamarri, I

    V. Motamarri, I. M. Khaymovich, and A. S. Gorsky, Refined cyclic renormalization group in Russian Doll model, arXiv:2406.08573 [cond-mat.dis-nn] 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    P. W. Anderson, Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass, Physical Review. 130 (1962) 439

    work page 1962

  71. [71]

    CMS collaboration, Boosting searches for 4-th generation quarks, CERN Courier Report (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: Identification with the O (3) nonlinear sigma model, Phys. Lett. A93, 464 (1983); Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1153 (1983)

    work page 1983

  73. [73]

    A. G. Abanov and P. B. Wiegmann, Theta-terms in nonlinear sigma-models, Nucl.Phys. B570 (2000) 685; arXiv:hep- th/9911025

    work page arXiv 2000

  74. [74]

    Are neutrino masses modular forms?

    F. Feruglio, Are neutrino masses modular forms? From My Vast Repertoire. . . Guido Altarelli’s Legacy. 2019. 227-266; arXiv:1706.08749

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    J. T. Penedo and S. T. Petcov, Lepton masses and mixing from modular S4 symmetry, Nuclear Physics B 939 (2019): 292; arXiv:1806.11040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Y. Abe, T. Higaki, J. Kawamura, and T. Kobayashi, Quark and lepton hierarchies from S4’ modular flavor symmetry, Physics Letters B, 842 (2023), 137977; arXiv:2302.11183

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Non-perturbative renormalization group for pseudo-hermitian scalar fields in 4D

    A. LeClair, Non-perturbative renormalization group for Higgs-like models in 4D, arXiv:2504.09327

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv