Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 109 references

Bio-inspired AI: Integrating Biological Complexity into Artificial Intelligence

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read To reach true artificial general intelligence, AI must copy the multi-scale, context-dependent organization of living systems, not just scale neural networks.

desk verdict A clear, honest position paper whose central 'requires' claim overreaches; useful as a synthesis, not as a new result. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15243 v1 pith:2IZE3UQV submitted 2024-11-22 q-bio.NC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.NEcs.SC

Nima Dehghani , Michael Levin This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NCcs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.NEcs.SC
keywords bio-inspiredAIartificialgeneralintelligencemulti-scaleorganizationhierarchicalinformationprocessingcontext-dependentcomputationpolycomputingtop-downcausalityembodied
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the field's focus on scaling neural networks has missed what actually generates biological intelligence: adaptive, context-dependent behavior that emerges from hierarchical, multi-scale organization in which causal influence flows both top-down and bottom-up. It draws on examples from single-celled organisms, plants, slime molds, and bacteria to show that intelligence does not require neurons, and it identifies a set of design principles—polycomputing, trial-and-error heuristics, requisite variety, modularity—that it claims are necessary ingredients for artificial general intelligence. If correct, the paper implies that AGI will not come from simply making current models larger; it will require engineered systems that embody these biological principles. The paper offers this as a framework for future research rather than a proven result.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the multi-scale, hierarchical organization of biological computation, formalized through concepts including polycomputing (the same physical substrate carrying out multiple computations at once), top-down causal modulation (higher-level states reshaping lower-level dynamics), and requisite variety (internal variety must match environmental variety for adaptive control). Stability is maintained by modularity, which the paper argues solves the conflict between requisite variety and the chaotic dynamics that arise from excessive connectivity, per Ashby and Gardner. This conceptual machinery is what the paper claims transfers from biology to AI design.

What would settle it

One concrete observation would settle the claim: a demonstration that a single-scale artificial system with no hierarchical organization and no top-down modulation—just a large feedforward network or a vast search—achieves human-level, context-dependent general intelligence, adapting in real time to unfamiliar embodied tasks. No such system exists today, but the paper's necessary-condition claim predicts it cannot be built; the existence proof would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the essence of biological intelligence is not any particular algorithm or neural substrate but a multi-scale organization in which every level—molecules, cells, tissues, organisms—has its own competencies and engages in adaptive information processing, a property it calls polycomputing. The authors argue that this organization supports context-dependent processing and top-down causality (the 'biological relativity' of no privileged level of causation), and that these features, together with trial-and-error heuristics and modular stability, are precisely what current AI lacks. They support the claim with three case studies—CNNs mirroring visual cortex hierarchy, Xenobots designed by evolutionary search, and a proposed neuron–astrocyte analog of transformer attention—as evidence that bio-inspired principles can be productively translated into engineered systems.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's load-bearing assumption is that the specific organizational features found in living things—layered structure, higher levels steering lower levels, and trying many strategies rather than computing one optimal answer—are the decisive missing ingredients for general artificial intelligence, and that a system built without them cannot achieve true generality.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Scaling current deep-learning architectures without adding hierarchical, multi-scale structure will not by itself produce artificial general intelligence.
  • Intelligence should be expected in systems that have no neurons at all; AI research should consider non-neural substrates, such as molecular or cellular logic, as legitimate computational models.
  • Benchmarks for intelligence should shift toward embodied, interactive tasks (an embodied Turing test) rather than purely disembodied ones like language or games.
  • Engineering AI that is stable and adaptive will require modular, hierarchical design with explicit top-down feedback, so that adding complexity does not drive the system into chaotic regimes.
  • Biological principles such as polycomputing and trial-and-error exploration could make AI far more energy-efficient and able to solve problems in open-ended, changing environments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable corollary the paper does not explicitly pursue: adding explicit top-down modulation modules to a transformer should improve out-of-distribution generalization and context-dependent reasoning on causal benchmarks, relative to an otherwise identical feedforward-only model.
  • If polycomputing is truly central, then hardware that deliberately multiplexes computations on the same substrate—for example, neuromorphic chips that allow multiple tasks to share the same synaptic weights—should show qualitative gains in adaptability beyond what conventional time-sharing of a single-task core produces.
  • The paper's claim that intelligence predates neurons implies a minimal footprint: a synthetic bacterial-like system engineered from molecular logic gates should be able to exhibit at least one form of context-dependent adaptive behavior, which would be a low-cost validation of the framework.
  • One consequence the authors leave implicit: if multi-scale top-down causality is necessary for general intelligence, then current large language models, which are essentially single-scale feedforward/attention systems, are not merely incomplete but fundamentally on the wrong trajectory for AGI—an implication that is more radical than the paper's own careful wording.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper is a perspective/review article arguing that biological intelligence is fundamentally context-dependent, adaptive, and organized hierarchically across multiple scales, with causal influence flowing both top-down and bottom-up. It reviews historical AI, lays out conceptual foundations (requisite variety, modularity, polycomputing, physical computing), discusses neuroscience insights (embodiment, neuromorphic efficiency, evolution), and presents three case studies (CNNs, xenobots, astrocyte-inspired transformers) as evidence. The paper concludes that general AI requires incorporating these biological principles into engineered systems. The support is qualitative and relies on post-hoc examples rather than controlled comparisons or quantitative validation.

Significance. The paper is a competent and readable synthesis that connects otherwise disparate literature and articulates a concrete research agenda for bio-inspired AI. Its main value is as a framing device: if the thesis is adopted, it would steer AI design toward multi-scale, embodied, context-sensitive architectures. The paper explicitly warns against overfitting to biology and acknowledges several limitations. However, the central claim is stated with a confidence that the body does not support; the evidence establishes plausibility and provides sufficiency examples, not necessity. The paper would be more persuasive if it presented the multi-scale/top-down thesis as a testable hypothesis rather than an established requirement.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section VIII] Section VIII states that mimicking biological intelligence 'requires a multi-scale organization of information, where causal interactions flow both top-down and bottom-up,' but the body only supports a hedged claim: Section II calls hierarchical organization 'the missing piece' with the hedge 'may be.' The formal principles cited do not establish necessity: Ashby's Law of Requisite Variety (Section III.C) demands sufficient variety, not specifically a hierarchical multi-scale architecture, and the Gardner-Ashby result (Section III.C) identifies modularity as one stabilizing strategy rather than the only one. Please rephrase the conclusion as a design hypothesis or provide a concrete argument that flat, non-hierarchical, high-variety controllers cannot in principle suffice.
  2. [Section V] The three case studies (CNNs, xenobots, astrocyte-transformers) are post-hoc examples showing that systems incorporating biological features can succeed, not that such features are necessary for general intelligence. No ablation removes the bio-inspired feature and demonstrates that performance collapses, and no negative case shows that absence of the feature prevents AGI. The paper should explicitly state that these are sufficiency examples and should specify what empirical or theoretical result would falsify the central necessity claim.
  3. [Sections II and III] The concept of 'multi-scale, context-dependent processing' is not defined with enough precision to distinguish biological intelligence from current artificial systems. Under a broad reading, a transformer already possesses hierarchical layers and attention-based context modulation (Section V.c), so the claim that this is the 'missing piece' (Section II) becomes vacuous. Please provide operational criteria for multi-scale organization and top-down causality that would allow a concrete test of whether a given architecture instantiates them.
  4. [Section III.E] The assertion that Bayesian inference 'cannot achieve the contextual, non-optimal generality of biological intelligence' is stated without supporting argument or citation beyond a general reference to Deutsch (2012). This is a strong claim that needs either a formal argument or a survey of counterexamples; as written it overstates the case and undermines the intended contrast between biological trial-and-error and pre-defined priors.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II] The word 'quantiative' should be 'quantitative'.
  2. [Section IV.B] The phrase 'act on potential' should be 'action potential'; the sentence containing it is otherwise garbled.
  3. [References] Reference 106 contains a LaTeX artifact '/suppress L ukasz Kaiser' and should be cleaned.
  4. [Section VII] The 'HomeoDynamic' project is mentioned without a citation; please add a reference or clearly mark it as unpublished work.
  5. [Header] The header date '26 November 2024' differs from the arXiv submission date '22 Nov 2024'; please reconcile.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a perspective paper whose conclusions rest on asserted biological principles and externally published case studies, not on fitted parameters or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper is a narrative perspective, not a derivation with equations, so there is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction. Its central claim, that mimicking biological intelligence requires multi-scale, context-dependent organization, is asserted rather than derived; the body hedges with 'The missing piece may be...' (Sec. II) while the conclusion upgrades to 'requires' (Sec. VIII). That modal gap is an argumentative weakness, not circularity. The many self-citations, such as polycomputing (refs. 13 and 60), physical computing (refs. 28 and 29), and the 'HomeoDynamic' project (Sec. VII), introduce the authors' own vocabulary and examples, but the underlying phenomena, including multifunctional proteins, hierarchical visual processing, and xenobot adaptability, are independently published and are not used to define the conclusion into existence. The case studies in Sec. V are retrospective illustrations, not predictions forced by prior fits, and the paper explicitly disclaims overfitting in Sec. II: 'Strictly adhering to biological models risks overfitting; biology should inspire, not constrain, AI design.' Thus no circular step meets the evidentiary bar of demonstrating reduction-to-input, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted because the paper is a literature review with no numerical model. No new physical entities are introduced; concepts like polycomputing and biological relativity are borrowed from prior publications.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Intelligence exists in non-neural substrates such as slime molds, plants, and bacteria, and is rooted in fundamental biological processes.
    This is the premise that justifies looking beyond neural architectures; it is asserted with citations in Section II and used to motivate multi-scale bio-inspired design.
  • domain assumption Multi-scale hierarchical organization with top-down causal influence is necessary for adaptive general intelligence.
    Section II states that 'the missing piece may be the hierarchical organization and multi-scale interactions' and that higher levels modulate lower-level components; the paper does not demonstrate this necessity.
  • domain assumption Trial-and-error heuristics are a fundamental knowledge-gathering strategy that deterministic algorithms and Bayesian inference cannot replace.
    Section III.B and Section III.E assert this, citing Ashby and Popper, but no formal comparison is provided.
  • domain assumption Biological information is semantic, carrying meaning and purpose, rather than merely Shannon information.
    Section II states this contrast without providing a formalism for semantic information or evidence that Shannon information is insufficient.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bio-inspired AI: Integrating Biological Complexity into Artificial Intelligence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2IZE3UQV

@misc{pith2026241115243,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bio-inspired AI: Integrating Biological Complexity into Artificial Intelligence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2IZE3UQV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15243}
}
read the original abstract

The pursuit of creating artificial intelligence (AI) mirrors our longstanding fascination with understanding our own intelligence. From the myths of Talos to Aristotelian logic and Heron's inventions, we have sought to replicate the marvels of the mind. While recent advances in AI hold promise, singular approaches often fall short in capturing the essence of intelligence. This paper explores how fundamental principles from biological computation--particularly context-dependent, hierarchical information processing, trial-and-error heuristics, and multi-scale organization--can guide the design of truly intelligent systems. By examining the nuanced mechanisms of biological intelligence, such as top-down causality and adaptive interaction with the environment, we aim to illuminate potential limitations in artificial constructs. Our goal is to provide a framework inspired by biological systems for designing more adaptable and robust artificial intelligent systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    William Ross. Ashby. Design for a brain: the origin of adaptive behaviour . Chapman & Hall Ltd., 1954

    1954

  2. [2]

    Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems

    William Ross Ashby. Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems . Cybernetica , 1(2):83--99, 1958

    1958

  3. [3]

    The problems of biological information

    Philip Ball. The problems of biological information . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A , 374(2063):20150072, feb 2016

    2016

  4. [4]

    Living robots

    Philip Ball. Living robots. Nature Materials , 19(3):265--265, Mar 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Cellular and evolutionary perspectives on organismal cognition: from unicellular to multicellular organisms

    František Baluška, William B Miller, and Arthur S Reber. Cellular and evolutionary perspectives on organismal cognition: from unicellular to multicellular organisms . Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 139(4):503--513, 03 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Sentience and consciousness in single cells: How the first minds emerged in unicellular species

    František Baluška and Arthur Reber. Sentience and consciousness in single cells: How the first minds emerged in unicellular species. BioEssays , 41(3):1800229, 2019

    2019

  7. [7]

    Bonnie L. Bassler. Small talk: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell , 109(4):421--424, 2002

    2002

  8. [8]

    Astrocyte calcium signaling: the third wave

    Narges Bazargani and David Attwell. Astrocyte calcium signaling: the third wave. Nature Neuroscience , 19(2):182--189, Feb 2016

    2016

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell

    Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , FAccT '21, page 610–623, New York,...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics

    Antoine B \' e rut, Artak Arakelyan, Artyom Petrosyan, Sergio Ciliberto, Raoul Dillenschneider, and Eric Lutz. Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics . Nature , 483(7388):187--189, mar 2012

    2012

  3. [11]

    Learning in transcriptional network models: Computational discovery of pathway-level memory and effective interventions

    Surama Biswas, Wesley Clawson, and Michael Levin. Learning in transcriptional network models: Computational discovery of pathway-level memory and effective interventions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 24(1), 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Gene regulatory networks exhibit several kinds of memory: Quantification of memory in biological and random transcriptional networks

    Surama Biswas, Santosh Manicka, Erik Hoel, and Michael Levin. Gene regulatory networks exhibit several kinds of memory: Quantification of memory in biological and random transcriptional networks. iScience , 24(3), Mar 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    There’s plenty of room right here: Biological systems as evolved, overloaded, multi-scale machines

    Joshua Bongard and Michael Levin. There’s plenty of room right here: Biological systems as evolved, overloaded, multi-scale machines. Biomimetics , 8(1), 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Multicellular artificial neural network-type architectures demonstrate computational problem solving

    Deepro Bonnerjee, Saswata Chakraborty, Biyas Mukherjee, Ritwika Basu, Abhishek Paul, and Sangram Bagh. Multicellular artificial neural network-type architectures demonstrate computational problem solving. Nature Chemical Biology , Sep 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex

    M C Booth and E T Rolls. View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex , 8(6):510--523, 09 1998

    1998

  8. [16]

    Integrative neuroscience of paramecium, a swimming neuron

    Romain Brette. Integrative neuroscience of paramecium, a swimming neuron . eNeuro , 8(3), 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    As we may think

    Vannevar Bush. As we may think. Interactions , 3(2):35–46, March 1996

    1996

  10. [18]

    Franks, James Sneyd, Guy Theraulaz, and Eric Bonabeau

    Scott Camazine, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, Nigel R. Franks, James Sneyd, Guy Theraulaz, and Eric Bonabeau. Self-Organization in Biological Systems . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001

    2001

  11. [19]

    Deep blue

    Murray Campbell, A.Joseph Hoane, and Feng hsiung Hsu. Deep blue. Artificial Intelligence , 134(1):57--83, 2002

    2002

  12. [20]

    Cohen and Charles M

    Joel E. Cohen and Charles M. Newman. When will a large complex system be stable? Journal of Theoretical Biology , 113(1):153--156, mar 1985

    1985

  13. [21]

    Why studying plant cognition is valuable, even if plants aren't cognitive

    David Cola c o. Why studying plant cognition is valuable, even if plants aren't cognitive. Synthese , 200(6):453, Nov 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Collins, Albert Q

    Katherine M. Collins, Albert Q. Jiang, Simon Frieder, Lionel Wong, Miri Zilka, Umang Bhatt, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Yuhuai Wu, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, William Hart, Timothy Gowers, Wenda Li, Adrian Weller, and Mateja Jamnik. Evaluating language models for mathematics through interact...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Cox and Thomas Dean

    David D. Cox and Thomas Dean. Neural Networks and Neuroscience-Inspired Computer Vision . Current Biology , 24(18):R921--R929, sep 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    The limitations of large language models for understanding human language and cognition

    Christine Cuskley, Rebecca Woods, and Molly Flaherty. The limitations of large language models for understanding human language and cognition. Open Mind , 8:1058--1083, 08 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Quantifying collectivity

    Bryan C Daniels, Christopher J Ellison, David C Krakauer, and Jessica C Flack. Quantifying collectivity . Current Opinion in Neurobiology , 37:106--113, apr 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning

    Mike Davies, Narayan Srinivasa, Tsung-Han Lin, Gautham Chinya, Yongqiang Cao, Sri Harsha Choday, Georgios Dimou, Prasad Joshi, Nabil Imam, Shweta Jain, Yuyun Liao, Chit-Kwan Lin, Andrew Lines, Ruokun Liu, Deepak Mathaikutty, Steven McCoy, Arnab Paul, Jonathan Tse, Guruguhanath...

    2018

  19. [27]

    Specialized astrocytes mediate glutamatergic gliotransmission in the cns

    Roberta de Ceglia, Ada Ledonne, David Gregory Litvin, Barbara Lykke Lind, Giovanni Carriero, Emanuele Claudio Latagliata, Erika Bindocci, Maria Amalia Di Castro, Iaroslav Savtchouk, Ilaria Vitali, Anurag Ranjak, Mauro Congiu, Tara Canonica, William Wisden, Kenneth Harris, Manu...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Systematizing cellular complexity: A hilbertian approach to biological problems

    Nima Dehghani. Systematizing cellular complexity: A hilbertian approach to biological problems. PLOS Complex Systems , 1(3):1--29, 11 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Physical computing: A category theoretic perspective on physical computation and system compositionality

    Nima Dehghani and Gianluca Caterina. Physical computing: A category theoretic perspective on physical computation and system compositionality. Journal of Physics: Complexity , 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Creative blocks, aeon

    D Deutsch. Creative blocks, aeon. URL https://aeon. co/essays/how-close-are-we-to-creating-artificial-intelligence , 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    Constructor theory

    David Deutsch. Constructor theory. Synthese , 190(18):4331--4359, Dec 2013

    2013

  24. [32]

    D'Souza, Quanxin Wang, Weiqing Ji, Andrew M

    Rinaldo D. D'Souza, Quanxin Wang, Weiqing Ji, Andrew M. Meier, Henry Kennedy, Kenneth Knoblauch, and Andreas Burkhalter. Hierarchical and nonhierarchical features of the mouse visual cortical network. Nature Communications , 13(1):503, Jan 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Felleman and David C

    Daniel J. Felleman and David C. Van Essen. Distributed Hierarchical Processing in the Primate Cerebral Cortex . Cerebral Cortex , 1(1):1--47, 01 1991

    1991

  26. [34]

    Morphological coordination: A common ancestral function unifying neural and non-neural signaling

    Chris Fields, Johanna Bischof, and Michael Levin. Morphological coordination: A common ancestral function unifying neural and non-neural signaling. Physiology , 35(1):16--30, 2020. PMID: 31799909

    2020

  27. [35]

    Competency in navigating arbitrary spaces as an invariant for analyzing cognition in diverse embodiments

    Chris Fields and Michael Levin. Competency in navigating arbitrary spaces as an invariant for analyzing cognition in diverse embodiments. Entropy , 24(6), 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Large-scale neuromorphic computing systems

    Steve Furber. Large-scale neuromorphic computing systems . Journal of Neural Engineering , 13(5):051001, aug 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Gardner and W

    Mark R. Gardner and W. Ross Ashby. Connectance of Large Dynamic (Cybernetic) Systems: Critical Values for Stability . Nature , 228(5273):784--784, nov 1970

    1970

  30. [38]

    Reconsidering the evidence for learning in single cells

    Samuel J Gershman, Petra EM Balbi, C Randy Gallistel, and Jeremy Gunawardena. Reconsidering the evidence for learning in single cells. eLife , 10:e61907, jan 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    An Imitation of Life

    William Grey Walter. An Imitation of Life . Scientific American , 182(5):42--45, may 1950

    1950

  32. [40]

    Learning outside the brain: Integrating cognitive science and systems biology

    Jeremy Gunawardena. Learning outside the brain: Integrating cognitive science and systems biology. Proceedings of the IEEE , 110(5):590--612, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Deception abilities emerged in large language models

    Thilo Hagendorff. Deception abilities emerged in large language models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 121(24):e2317967121, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Hoel, Larissa Albantakis, and Giulio Tononi

    Erik P. Hoel, Larissa Albantakis, and Giulio Tononi. Quantifying causal emergence shows that macro can beat micro . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 110(49):19790--19795, nov 2013

    2013

  35. [43]

    Hopfield

    John J. Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 79(8):2554--2558, apr 1982

    1982

  36. [44]

    Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems

    Giacomo Indiveri and Shih-Chii Liu. Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems. Proceedings of the IEEE , 103(8):1379--1397, 2015

    2015

  37. [45]

    Evolution and tinkering

    Francois Jacob. Evolution and tinkering . Science , 196(4295):1161--1166, jun 1977

    1977

  38. [46]

    Jenks, Katya Tsimring, Jacque Pak Kan Ip, Jose C

    Kyle R. Jenks, Katya Tsimring, Jacque Pak Kan Ip, Jose C. Zepeda, and Mriganka Sur. Heterosynaptic plasticity and the experience-dependent refinement of developing neuronal circuits. Frontiers in Neural Circuits , 15, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Kastanenka, Rubén Moreno-Bote, Maurizio De Pittà, Gertrudis Perea, Abel Eraso-Pichot, Roser Masgrau, Kira E

    Ksenia V. Kastanenka, Rubén Moreno-Bote, Maurizio De Pittà, Gertrudis Perea, Abel Eraso-Pichot, Roser Masgrau, Kira E. Poskanzer, and Elena Galea. A roadmap to integrate astrocytes into systems neuroscience. Glia , 68(1):5--26, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Kastanenka, and Dmitry Krotov

    Leo Kozachkov, Ksenia V. Kastanenka, and Dmitry Krotov. Building transformers from neurons and astrocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 120(34):e2219150120, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Neuron-astrocyte associative memory, 2024

    Leo Kozachkov, Jean-Jacques Slotine, and Dmitry Krotov. Neuron-astrocyte associative memory, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms

    Sam Kriegman, Douglas Blackiston, Michael Levin, and Josh Bongard. A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 117(4):1853--1859, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Kinematic self-replication in reconfigurable organisms

    Sam Kriegman, Douglas Blackiston, Michael Levin, and Josh Bongard. Kinematic self-replication in reconfigurable organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 118(49):e2112672118, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks

    Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In F. Pereira, C.J. Burges, L. Bottou, and K.Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 25. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012

    2012

  45. [53]

    A new frontier for hopfield networks

    Dmitry Krotov. A new frontier for hopfield networks. Nature Reviews Physics , 5(7):366--367, Jul 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Causal reasoning and large language models: Opening a new frontier for causality, 2024

    Emre Kıcıman, Robert Ness, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. Causal reasoning and large language models: Opening a new frontier for causality, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process

    Rolf Landauer. Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process . IBM Journal of Research and Development , 5(3):183--191, jul 1961

    1961

  48. [56]

    Information is Physical

    Rolf Landauer. Information is Physical . Physics Today , 44(5):23--29, may 1991

    1991

  49. [57]

    Lecun, L

    Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE , 86(11):2278--2324, 1998

    1998

  50. [58]

    Deep learning

    Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. Nature , 521(7553):436--444, May 2015

    2015

  51. [59]

    The cost of cortical computation

    Peter Lennie. The cost of cortical computation. Current Biology , 13(6):493--497, 2003

    2003

  52. [60]

    Self-improvising memory: A perspective on memories as agential, dynamically reinterpreting cognitive glue

    Michael Levin. Self-improvising memory: A perspective on memories as agential, dynamically reinterpreting cognitive glue. Entropy , 26(6), 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Lin, Max Tegmark, and David Rolnick

    Henry W. Lin, Max Tegmark, and David Rolnick. Why does deep and cheap learning work so well? Journal of Statistical Physics , 168(6):1223--1247, Sep 2017

    2017

  54. [62]

    A survey of transformers

    Tianyang Lin, Yuxin Wang, Xiangyang Liu, and Xipeng Qiu. A survey of transformers. AI Open , 3:111--132, 2022

    2022

  55. [63]

    J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 3431--3440, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, jun 2015. IEEE Computer Society

    2015

  56. [64]

    The biogenic approach to cognition

    Pamela Lyon. The biogenic approach to cognition. Cognitive Processing , 7(1):11--29, Mar 2006

    2006

  57. [65]

    The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered

    Pamela Lyon. The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered. Frontiers in Microbiology , 6, 2015

    2015

  58. [66]

    Ma, Pakpong Chirarattananon, Sawyer B

    Kevin Y. Ma, Pakpong Chirarattananon, Sawyer B. Fuller, and Robert J. Wood. Controlled Flight of a Biologically Inspired Insect-Scale Robot . Science , 340(6132):603--607, may 2013

    2013

  59. [67]

    Robert M. May. Will a Large Complex System be Stable? Nature , 238(5364):413--414, aug 1972

    1972

  60. [68]

    The Concept of Information in Biology

    John Maynard Smith. The Concept of Information in Biology . Philosophy of Science , 67(2):177--194, jun 2000

    2000

  61. [69]

    Generality in Artificial Intelligence

    John McCarthy. Generality in Artificial Intelligence . Communications of the ACM , 30(12):1030--1035, dec 1987

    1987

  62. [70]

    Merolla, John V

    Paul A. Merolla, John V. Arthur, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, Andrew S. Cassidy, Jun Sawada, Filipp Akopyan, Bryan L. Jackson, Nabil Imam, Chen Guo, Yutaka Nakamura, Bernard Brezzo, Ivan Vo, Steven K. Esser, Rathinakumar Appuswamy, Brian Taba, Arnon Amir, Myron D. Flickner, William ...

    2014

  63. [71]

    Debates on the nature of artificial general intelligence

    Melanie Mitchell. Debates on the nature of artificial general intelligence. Science , 383(6689):eado7069, 2024

    2024

  64. [72]

    The turing test and our shifting conceptions of intelligence

    Melanie Mitchell. The turing test and our shifting conceptions of intelligence. Science , 385(6710):eadq9356, 2024

    2024

  65. [73]

    Krakauer

    Melanie Mitchell and David C. Krakauer. The debate over understanding in ai’s large language models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 120(13):e2215907120, 2023

    2023

  66. [74]

    Allen Newell and Herbert A. Simon. Computer Simulation of Human Thinking: A theory of problem solving expressed as a computer program permits simulation of thinking processes . Science , 134(3495):2011--2017, dec 1961

    2011

  67. [75]

    A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation

    Denis Noble. A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation. Interface Focus , 2(1):55--64, 2012

    2012

  68. [76]

    Early-life maturation of the somatosensory cortex: sensory experience and beyond

    Ijeoma Nwabudike and Alicia Che. Early-life maturation of the somatosensory cortex: sensory experience and beyond. Frontiers in Neural Circuits , 18, 2024

    2024

  69. [77]

    Olshausen and David J

    Bruno A. Olshausen and David J. Field. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature , 381(6583):607--609, Jun 1996

    1996

  70. [78]

    Blevins, Johan U

    Sung-Jin Park, Mattia Gazzola, Kyung Soo Park, Shirley Park, Valentina Di Santo, Erin L. Blevins, Johan U. Lind, Patrick H. Campbell, Stephanie Dauth, Andrew K. Capulli, Francesco S. Pasqualini, Seungkuk Ahn, Alexander Cho, Hongyan Yuan, Ben M. Maoz, Ragu Vijaykumar, Jeong-Woo...

    2016

  71. [79]

    Juan M. R. Parrondo, Jordan M. Horowitz, and Takahiro Sagawa. Thermodynamics of information . Nature Physics , 11(2):131--139, feb 2015

    2015

  72. [80]

    Heuristics: Intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving

    Judea Pearl. Heuristics: Intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving . Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Inc.,Reading, MA, Jan 1984

    1984

  73. [81]

    How the body shapes the way we think : a new view of intelligence

    Rolf Pfeifer, Josh Bongard, and Simon Grand. How the body shapes the way we think : a new view of intelligence . MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2007

    2007

  74. [82]

    Karl R. Popper. The logic of scientific discovery . Routledge, London/New York, 1959

    1959

  75. [83]

    Gerard Radnitzky, W. W. Bartley, and Karl R. Popper. Evolutionary Epistemology Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge . Wiley-Blackwell, 1989

    1989

  76. [84]

    Raichle and Debra A

    Marcus E. Raichle and Debra A. Gusnard. Appraising the brain's energy budget. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 99(16):10237--10239, 2002

    2002

  77. [85]

    Hopfield networks is all you need, 2021

    Hubert Ramsauer, Bernhard Schäfl, Johannes Lehner, Philipp Seidl, Michael Widrich, Thomas Adler, Lukas Gruber, Markus Holzleitner, Milena Pavlović, Geir Kjetil Sandve, Victor Greiff, David Kreil, Michael Kopp, Günter Klambauer, Johannes Brandstetter, and Sepp Hochreiter. Hopfi...

    2021

  78. [86]

    Hierarchical organization of the human ventral visual streams revealed with magnetoencephalography

    Edmund T Rolls, Gustavo Deco, Yi Zhang, and Jianfeng Feng. Hierarchical organization of the human ventral visual streams revealed with magnetoencephalography . Cerebral Cortex , 33(20):10686--10701, 09 2023

    2023

  79. [87]

    Behavior Purpose and Teleology

    Arturo Rosenblueth, Norbert Wiener, and Julian Bigelow. Behavior Purpose and Teleology . Philosophy of Science , 10(1):18--24, jan 1943

    1943

  80. [88]

    Towards spike-based machine intelligence with neuromorphic computing

    Kaushik Roy, Akhilesh Jaiswal, and Priyadarshini Panda. Towards spike-based machine intelligence with neuromorphic computing. Nature , 575(7784):607--617, Nov 2019

    2019

  81. [89]

    Energetics of the brain and ai

    Anders Sandberg. Energetics of the brain and ai. Technical report, Oxford University, 2016

    2016

  82. [90]

    R. D. Seidler and R. G. Carson. Sensorimotor learning: Neurocognitive mechanisms and individual differences. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation , 14(1):74, Jul 2017

    2017

  83. [91]

    Sejnowski

    Terrence J. Sejnowski. Large Language Models and the Reverse Turing Test . Neural Computation , 35(3):309--342, 02 2023

    2023

  84. [92]

    Claude E. Shannon. A Mathematical Theory of Communication . Bell System Technical Journal , 27(3):379--423, jul 1948

    1948

  85. [93]

    David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J. Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, Sander Dieleman, Dominik Grewe, John Nham, Nal Kalchbrenner, Ilya Sutskever, Timothy Lillicrap, Madele...

    2016

  86. [94]

    Herbert A. Simon. The Architecture of Complexity . Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society , 106(6):467--482, 1962

    1962

  87. [95]

    Herbert A. Simon. The Sciences of the Artificial , chapter The Architecture of Complexity. M.I.T. Press, 1969

    1969

  88. [96]

    Simon and Peter A

    Herbert A. Simon and Peter A. Simon. Trial and error search in solving difficult problems: Evidence from the game of chess . Behavioral Science , 7(4):425--429, jan 1962

    1962

  89. [97]

    Stanley, Jeff Clune, Joel Lehman, and Risto Miikkulainen

    Kenneth O. Stanley, Jeff Clune, Joel Lehman, and Risto Miikkulainen. Designing neural networks through neuroevolution. Nature Machine Intelligence , 1(1):24--35, Jan 2019

    2019

  90. [98]

    The Artificial Life Route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Embodied, Situated Agents

    Luc Steels and Rodney Brooks. The Artificial Life Route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Embodied, Situated Agents . Routledge, 1st edition, 1995

    1995

  91. [99]

    Wingreen

    Thibaud Taillefumier and Ned S. Wingreen. Optimal census by quorum sensing. PLOS Computational Biology , 11(5):1--20, 05 2015

    2015

  92. [100]

    Tenenbaum, Charles Kemp, Thomas L

    Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Charles Kemp, Thomas L. Griffiths, and Noah D. Goodman. How to Grow a Mind: Statistics Structure, and Abstraction . Science , 331(6022):1279--1285, mar 2011

    2011

  93. [101]

    Bebber, Mark D

    Atsushi Tero, Seiji Takagi, Tetsu Saigusa, Kentaro Ito, Daniel P. Bebber, Mark D. Fricker, Katsuhiko Yumiki, Ryo Kobayashi, and Toshiyuki Nakagaki. Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design. Science , 327(5964):439--442, 2010

    2010

  94. [102]

    Towards the idea of molecular brains

    Youri Timsit and Sergeant-Perthuis Grégoire. Towards the idea of molecular brains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 22(21), 2021

    2021

  95. [103]

    Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality

    Shoichi Toyabe, Takahiro Sagawa, Masahito Ueda, Eiro Muneyuki, and Masaki Sano. Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality . Nature Physics , 6(12):988--992, nov 2010

    2010

  96. [104]

    Plant intelligence

    Anthony Trewavas. Plant intelligence. Naturwissenschaften , 92(9):401--413, 2005

    2005

  97. [105]

    The embodied mind, revised edition: Cognitive science and human experience

    Francisco J Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. The embodied mind, revised edition: Cognitive science and human experience . MIT press, 2017

    2017

  98. [106]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural In...

    2017

  99. [107]

    Walker and Paul C

    Sarah I. Walker and Paul C. W. Davies. The algorithmic origins of life . Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 10(79):20120869--20120869, dec 2012

    2012

  100. [108]

    Daniel L. K. Yamins, Ha Hong, Charles F. Cadieu, Ethan A. Solomon, Darren Seibert, and James J. DiCarlo. Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 111(23):8619--8624, 2014

    2014

  101. [109]

    O lveczky, Yoshua Bengio, Kwabena Boahen, Matthew Botvinick, Dmitri Chklovskii, Anne Churchland, Claudia Clopath, James DiCarlo, Surya Ganguli, Jeff Hawkins, Konrad K \

    Anthony Zador, Sean Escola, Blake Richards, Bence \"O lveczky, Yoshua Bengio, Kwabena Boahen, Matthew Botvinick, Dmitri Chklovskii, Anne Churchland, Claudia Clopath, James DiCarlo, Surya Ganguli, Jeff Hawkins, Konrad K \"o rding, Alexei Koulakov, Yann LeCun, Timothy Lillicrap,...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.