Bimanual Grasp Synthesis for Dexterous Robot Hands

Chenxi Xiao; Yanming Shao

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 45 references

Bimanual Grasp Synthesis for Dexterous Robot Hands

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bimanual dexterous grasp synthesis can be solved by optimizing an energy function and then accelerated with a diffusion model trained on verified grasps.

desk verdict Useful bimanual dexterous grasp optimizer and dataset, but the DDPM evaluation is confounded by energy-based post-processing and needs an ablation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15903 v1 pith:XWCMOY34 submitted 2024-11-24 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CV

Yanming Shao , Chenxi Xiao This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CV

keywords bimanualgraspingdexterousmanipulationgraspsynthesisdiffusionmodeldatasetforceclosurephysicssimulationrobothands

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Most robotic grasp synthesis assumes one hand, leaving large and heavy objects that naturally require two hands largely unhandled. This paper tries to close that gap by proposing an optimization-based pipeline that searches the combined configuration space of two dexterous hands for stable bimanual grasps on arbitrary 3D object meshes. Each candidate grasp is checked in a physics simulator, producing a dataset of over 150,000 verified bimanual grasps across 900 objects. The paper then trains a denoising diffusion model on those verified grasps, and reports that it generates grasps for unseen objects at a success rate comparable to the optimizer's while being far faster. If this holds, it gives humanoid robots a general, fast bimanual grasping skill for everyday objects.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the energy function in Table I, whose terms are $E_{\mathrm{dis}}$ (distance between hand surface points and object), $E_{\mathrm{fc}}$ (force closure via the norm of the grasp matrix $G$ built from 8 contact points), $E_{\mathrm{vew}}$ (wrench-ellipse volume, keeping $GG^T$ well conditioned), three penetration penalties $E_{\mathrm{objpen}}$, $E_{\mathrm{selfpen}}$, $E_{\mathrm{bimpen}}$, and $E_{\mathrm{joint}}$ for joint-limit violations. Minimizing this function over the 56-dimensional action space of two hands, each with 22 joint angles and a rigid-body pose, defines the BimanGrasp search. The same energy function reappears as a short post-processing refinement after the diffusion model generates a candidate, which is how penetration errors from the generative step are cleaned up. The generative model itself is a denoising diffusion probabilistic model conditioned on point-cloud features of the object.

What would settle it

Repeat the evaluation on a real bimanual humanoid with two 22-DoF hands across the same object set; if hardware success rates fall well below the simulated rates, the simulator's contact model is not transferable and the central claim fails in practice. Even inside simulation, re-running the verification with a different contact friction model or solver and checking whether the bimanual-versus-unimanual ranking persists would test the robustness of the comparison.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that bimanual grasp synthesis for dexterous hands can be made reliable by optimizing a hand-crafted energy function, and then made fast by learning from the optimized results. The energy function rewards closeness to the object surface, force closure measured through an 8-contact grasp matrix $G$, robustness of the wrench ellipse, and penalties for hand-object, self-, and inter-hand penetration plus joint-limit violations; minimizing it with a stochastic optimizer yields the BimanGrasp algorithm. Physical verification in simulation labels which of the produced grasps can lift and hold an object for two seconds under randomized gravity directions. The verified grasps form a dataset that trains BimanGrasp-DDPM, a conditional diffusion model that turns object point-cloud features into new bimanual grasp poses; a short post-processing optimization removes penetrations. The reported result is that the diffusion model reaches a 69.87% verification success rate, close to the optimizer's rate, while generating 64 grasps in parallel in 8.19 seconds on a single commercial GPU.

Load-bearing premise

The physics simulator used for verification models real contact and friction accurately enough that a grasp labeled stable in simulation will also hold on physical hardware; the paper does not test on a real robot.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If correct, robot manipulators gain a principled route from object mesh to coordinated two-hand grasp, including objects as large as 0.7 m in diameter that unimanual methods almost never grasp.
Jointly optimizing the two hands matters: the same pipeline run as two independent single-hand optimizers succeeds less often at every tested object density.
A learned generator can replace most of the expensive optimization: BimanGrasp-DDPM matches the optimizer's success rate at a fraction of the compute and works on unseen objects.
The verified-grasp dataset is reusable: training on only 75% of the objects still transfers to the remaining 25% and to objects from other benchmark datasets.
The method's advantage grows with object mass: bimanual success degrades more gracefully than unimanual as density increases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the simulator's contact model transfers to hardware, the remaining bottleneck is not the generative model but the post-processing step: even the fast model still spends optimization steps per grasp to remove penetrations, so a diffusion model with built-in physical constraints could make generation truly single-shot.
The same dataset could be reused beyond grasp synthesis, for example as supervision for bimanual manipulation policies or as a prior for tasks requiring coordinated finger placement; the paper does not train such policies, so this is an extension the authors leave implicit.
A sim-to-real gap is the untested risk: the 69.87% success rate is measured in the same simulator used to label the training data, so hardware deployment would require a separate transfer evaluation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core deliverable here is BimanGrasp-Dataset: about 150k simulated bimanual Shadow Hand grasps on 900 GSO objects, each verified in Isaac Gym by lifting and holding with randomized gravity directions. The optimization pipeline that produced it is a reasonable extension of DexGraspNet to two hands, with force-closure, wrench-volume, penetration, and joint-limit terms. The comparison against single-hand baselines shows a plausible advantage for large objects. That part is a solid resource for the bimanual manipulation community.

The diffusion model story is where the paper gets shaky. Every reported success rate (42.39%, 54.06%, 69.87%) comes from DDPM outputs that were then refined by 100 steps of the very same energy function that BimanGrasp optimizes (Sec. III-D). The raw DDPM output is never reported. The reported rates are close to the BimanGrasp optimizer's rates in Table II, which is suspicious. The stress-test note is right: without a baseline that applies the same 100-step refinement to random or baseline-generated initial grasps, you cannot attribute the success or the speed to the diffusion model. The speed comparison is also muddled; 8.19 seconds for 64 grasps on an RTX 4090 is not obviously "quasi-real time," and the optimizer's timing is not given on the same hardware.

Other soft spots, in descending order of importance: the energy weights in Table I are never reported, so the optimizer is not reproducible as described. There are no error bars anywhere, and the density row for 69.87% repeats rho=2500, likely a typo for 500. The "first" claim is overstated because ArtiGrasp [7] does bimanual dexterous grasping, though its focus is articulation. And everything is simulated; the authors explicitly defer real-robot validation.

On balance, I would send this to peer review if the venue cares about datasets and simulation resources. The optimizer and dataset will be useful even if the DDPM claim is later qualified. But the referee must push for the ablation and the missing details. I would not take the DDPM numbers at face value.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a pipeline for synthesizing stable bimanual grasps for two Shadow Hands. First, it introduces BimanGrasp, a stochastic-optimization algorithm that minimizes a weighted sum of energy terms capturing hand-object distance, force closure, wrench volume, penetration, and joint limits. Second, it generates a large dataset of grasp poses for 900 GSO objects, labels them with success/failure in Isaac Gym, and releases the successful subset as the BimanGrasp-Dataset. Third, it trains a conditional diffusion model (BimanGrasp-DDPM) on this dataset, with a short 100-step energy-based post-processing refinement, and reports success rates comparable to the optimizer at lower computational cost. The paper also compares bimanual versus unimanual grasping and reports robustness to object density and friction coefficient.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a useful contribution to dexterous manipulation: it provides a first large-scale bimanual dexterous-grasp dataset, demonstrates a joint-optimization formulation for two high-DoF hands, and shows that a diffusion model can propose grasps for unseen objects. Strengths include the physics verification protocol in Isaac Gym with randomized gravity directions, the dataset scale, and the clear presentation of the algorithmic pipeline. However, the headline claim about BimanGrasp-DDPM being comparable to the optimizer at much lower cost is currently confounded by the energy-based post-processing step, and several reproducibility-critical details are missing. The paper deserves revision rather than rejection because the issues are addressable with additional experiments and reporting.

major comments (5)

[Sec. III-B, Table I] The energy function is defined as a weighted sum of the terms in Table I, but the weights are never reported. Without these weights, the BimanGrasp optimization is not reproducible, and one cannot assess how the 100-step DDPM post-processing in Sec. III-D relates to the full 10000-step optimizer objective. Please report the exact weights for all seven terms, along with the penetration threshold δ, the distance threshold ϵ, and the selection rule for the eight contact points.
[Sec. III-D and Sec. IV-B] The core claim that BimanGrasp-DDPM generates grasps with success comparable to the optimizer is not yet supported, because all reported DDPM numbers are obtained after 100 steps of energy-based post-processing using the same energy terms as the BimanGrasp optimizer. The DDPM success rates (42.39%, 54.06%, 69.87%) closely match the optimizer rates at the corresponding densities (41.02%, 54.03%, 71.42% in Table II), which is consistent with the post-processing, not the diffusion model, carrying the performance. Please add an ablation: report raw DDPM success before post-processing, success of 100-step energy refinement from random initial grasps, and success of 100-step refinement from baseline-generated grasps. Without these conditions, the acceleration and comparability claims cannot be attributed to the DDPM.
[Sec. IV-B] The density label for the headline success rate is internally inconsistent: the text reports 69.87% for ρ = 2500 kg·m⁻³, but 54.06% was already reported for that density, and the 69.87% value is instead consistent with the ρ = 500 row of Table II. This typo affects the abstract's central number and must be corrected, and the reported DDPM rates should be rechecked against the experimental records.
[Sec. IV-B] The two learned baselines, CVAE and Uni2Bim(dm), are not described in enough detail to judge fairness. The manuscript does not specify the CVAE architecture, training procedure, conditioning input, or whether either baseline receives the same 100-step energy-based post-processing as BimanGrasp-DDPM. If the baselines are evaluated without post-processing, the comparison conflates model quality with the refinement step. Please provide full implementation details and, ideally, also evaluate the baselines with the same post-processing protocol.
[Tables II and III, Sec. IV-B] All success rates are reported as single numbers without error bars, confidence intervals, or object-level variance. Given that the evaluation averages over 900 objects and 500 grasps per object, object-to-object variance is likely substantial and could change the conclusions about 'consistently higher' and 'comparable' performance. Please report per-object mean and standard deviation (or confidence intervals) for the main comparisons.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract and Sec. IV-A] The abstract states the dataset contains 'over 150k verified grasps,' while Sec. IV-A reports synthesizing 450k bimanual grasps (900 objects × 500 poses). Please clarify whether the dataset contains 150k verified grasps and what happened to the remaining synthesized grasps.
[Sec. II-A] The reference list in the sentence on variational autoencoders reads '[23], [23]–[25]', which appears to be a duplicate citation typo and should be cleaned up.
[Table I] The definition of d(p, O) is written as min_{q∈O}(p, q); this should be min_{q∈O} ||p − q||, and the sentence about the penetration terms 'unless it is lower than a fixed small threshold ϵ' is ambiguous about which quantity is thresholded.
[Sec. III-C] The friction coefficient is fixed at 3, which is high for typical objects and hand surfaces. Since Table III later shows sensitivity to friction, please justify this choice or add a brief discussion of its effect on the dataset labels and on transfer to real hardware.
[Sec. IV-C] The computational cost paragraph reports 170 GB GPU memory and 117 minutes per 4,500 grasps for dataset generation, and 8.19 seconds for 64 parallel DDPM inferences, but it does not give the per-grasp time for the full DDPM-plus-post-processing pipeline or for the BimanGrasp optimizer. Please include a direct speed comparison to support the 'significant acceleration' claim.
[Sec. IV-B and Fig. 7] The text refers to 'Bimanual-DDPM' in one place; the model name elsewhere is BimanGrasp-DDPM. Also, Fig. 7 would benefit from error bars to support the claim that bimanual grasps outperform unimanual baselines across all diameter bins.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the DDPM is tested on held-out objects in a standard simulator, and although the same simulator labels the training set and refines outputs, the central generalization claim is not constructed from its own output.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The BimanGrasp optimizer minimizes the energy terms in Table I, and labels are produced by an independent Isaac Gym physical verification (Sec. III-C). The DDPM is trained only on verified grasps from 675 GSO objects and then evaluated on 225 held-out GSO objects and on objects from DDG, YCB, and ContactDB (Sec. IV-B). Held-out evaluation breaks the self-definition loop: success is measured against a simulator-based criterion that is not defined in terms of the DDPM's own outputs. There is no load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem; the cited initialization [4] and force-closure formulation [12] are external prior work. The main methodological caveat is that DDPM outputs are post-processed with 100 steps of the same energy optimization used by BimanGrasp (Sec. III-D), so the reported success rates are pipeline-level rather than raw-model success, and the paper lacks an ablation of the DDPM without refinement. That is a missing control and an attribution confound, not a reduction by construction: the generalization to unseen objects would still be falsifiable even with post-processing. The repeated 'ρ = 2500 kg · m−3' in the IV-B success-rate summary is a typographical inconsistency, but it does not indicate circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on the fidelity of the physics simulator and hand-chosen optimization and verification parameters, not on new physical entities.

free parameters (4)

Energy function weights = not reported
The weighted sum in Sec. III-B (Table I) requires weights for Edis, Efc, Evew, Eobjpen, Eselfpen, Ebimpen, and Ejoint; values are not given, so the optimization cannot be exactly reproduced.
Friction coefficient = 3.0 (primary), varied 0.5 to 3.0
Friction is set to 3.0 following [4] and [26], which is high. The robustness test shows success drops to 45.4% at friction 0.5, so results are sensitive to this hand-chosen parameter.
Object density = 2500 kg/m^3 (primary), varied 500 to 5000
Density is chosen to create different masses; success rates range from 41% to 71% across densities, so this choice strongly affects reported performance.
Physics verification thresholds = 2.0 s hold, 6 trials, penetration below 1.5 mm
These criteria define a successful grasp in Sec. III-C and determine the dataset labels and all success-rate numbers.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Isaac Gym physics simulation is a valid proxy for real-world grasp success
All dataset labels and evaluation metrics are computed in Isaac Gym; no real-robot validation is presented, and Sec. IV-C lists real-world validation as future work.
domain assumption The 8-contact-point force closure approximation is sufficient to model grasp stability
Efc and Evew in Table I optimize a heuristic based on only 8 contact points, following [12]; the paper does not verify this against a more complete contact model.
domain assumption The grasp success criteria, no slip for 2 seconds over 6 trials with random rotations, is a reliable measure of grasp quality
Sec. III-C defines the success label; this binary criterion is used without validating against real-world grasping outcomes.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bimanual Grasp Synthesis for Dexterous Robot Hands." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XWCMOY34

@misc{pith2026241115903,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bimanual Grasp Synthesis for Dexterous Robot Hands},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XWCMOY34}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15903}
}

read the original abstract

Humans naturally perform bimanual skills to handle large and heavy objects. To enhance robots' object manipulation capabilities, generating effective bimanual grasp poses is essential. Nevertheless, bimanual grasp synthesis for dexterous hand manipulators remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose the BimanGrasp algorithm for synthesizing bimanual grasps on 3D objects. The BimanGrasp algorithm generates grasp poses by optimizing an energy function that considers grasp stability and feasibility. Furthermore, the synthesized grasps are verified using the Isaac Gym physics simulation engine. These verified grasp poses form the BimanGrasp-Dataset, the first large-scale synthesized bimanual dexterous hand grasp pose dataset to our knowledge. The dataset comprises over 150k verified grasps on 900 objects, facilitating the synthesis of bimanual grasps through a data-driven approach. Last, we propose BimanGrasp-DDPM, a diffusion model trained on the BimanGrasp-Dataset. This model achieved a grasp synthesis success rate of 69.87\% and significant acceleration in computational speed compared to BimanGrasp algorithm.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15903 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Our pipeline for synthesizing stable bimanual grasps, which includes: (A) generating grasp poses by initializing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Initialization of grasp poses (with randomization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Visualization of the BimanGrasp algorithm’s optimiza [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Visualization of the grasp poses synthesized on daily [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The average grasp success rate across various object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Visualization of four most common failure patterns: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The diverse bimanual stable grasps synthesized with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

[7]

Artigrasp: Physically plausible synthesis of bi-manual dexterous grasping and articulation,

H. Zhang, S. Christen, Z. Fan, L. Zheng, J. Hwangbo, J. Song, and O. Hilliges, “Artigrasp: Physically plausible synthesis of bi-manual dexterous grasping and articulation,” in 2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 235–246

work page 2024
[1]

Bimanual grasp planning,

N. Vahrenkamp, M. Przybylski, T. Asfour, and R. Dillmann, “Bimanual grasp planning,” in 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 2011, pp. 493–499

work page 2011
[2]

Ddgc: Generative deep dexterous grasping in clutter,

J. Lundell, F. Verdoja, and V . Kyrki, “Ddgc: Generative deep dexterous grasping in clutter,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 6899–6906, 2021

work page 2021
[3]

Gendex- grasp: Generalizable dexterous grasping,

P. Li, T. Liu, Y . Li, Y . Geng, Y . Zhu, Y . Yang, and S. Huang, “Gendex- grasp: Generalizable dexterous grasping,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 8068–8074

2023
[4]

Dexgraspnet: A large-scale robotic dexterous grasp dataset for general objects based on simulation,

R. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Chen, Y . Xu, P. Li, T. Liu, and H. Wang, “Dexgraspnet: A large-scale robotic dexterous grasp dataset for general objects based on simulation,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 11 359–11 366

work page 2023
[5]

Grasp multiple objects with one hand,

Y . Li, B. Liu, Y . Geng, P. Li, Y . Yang, Y . Zhu, T. Liu, and S. Huang, “Grasp multiple objects with one hand,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

work page 2024
[6]

Towards human-level bimanual dexterous ma- nipulation with reinforcement learning,

Y . Chen, T. Wu, S. Wang, X. Feng, J. Jiang, Z. Lu, S. McAleer, H. Dong, S.-C. Zhu, and Y . Yang, “Towards human-level bimanual dexterous ma- nipulation with reinforcement learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 5150–5163, 2022

work page 2022
[8]

Bi-dexhands: Towards human-level bimanual dexterous manipulation,

Y . Chen, Y . Geng, F. Zhong, J. Ji, J. Jiang, Z. Lu, H. Dong, and Y . Yang, “Bi-dexhands: Towards human-level bimanual dexterous manipulation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2023

work page 2023

Show all 45 references

[9]

Arctic: A dataset for dexterous bimanual hand- object manipulation,

Z. Fan, O. Taheri, D. Tzionas, M. Kocabas, M. Kaufmann, M. J. Black, and O. Hilliges, “Arctic: A dataset for dexterous bimanual hand- object manipulation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 12 943–12 954

2023
[10]

Da2 dataset: Toward dexterity-aware dual-arm grasping,

G. Zhai, Y . Zheng, Z. Xu, X. Kong, Y . Liu, B. Busam, Y . Ren, N. Navab, and Z. Zhang, “Da2 dataset: Toward dexterity-aware dual-arm grasping,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 8941–8948, 2022

2022
[11]

Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation,

O. M. Andrychowicz, B. Baker, M. Chociej, R. Jozefowicz, B. McGrew, J. Pachocki, A. Petron, M. Plappert, G. Powell, A. Ray et al., “Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2020

2020
[12]

Synthesizing diverse and physically stable grasps with arbitrary hand structures using differ- entiable force closure estimator,

T. Liu, Z. Liu, Z. Jiao, Y . Zhu, and S.-C. Zhu, “Synthesizing diverse and physically stable grasps with arbitrary hand structures using differ- entiable force closure estimator,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 470–477, 2021

2021
[13]

Isaac gym: High performance gpu-based physics simulation for robot learning,

V . Makoviychuk, L. Wawrzyniak, Y . Guo, M. Lu, K. Storey, M. Macklin, D. Hoeller, N. Rudin, A. Allshire, A. Handa et al. , “Isaac gym: High performance gpu-based physics simulation for robot learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10470, 2021

2021 arXiv
[14]

Trends and challenges in robot manipulation,

A. Billard and D. Kragic, “Trends and challenges in robot manipulation,” Science, vol. 364, no. 6446, p. eaat8414, 2019

2019
[15]

Push-net: Deep planar pushing for objects with unknown physical properties

J. K. Li, W. S. Lee, and D. Hsu, “Push-net: Deep planar pushing for objects with unknown physical properties.” in Robotics: Science and Systems, vol. 14, 2018, pp. 1–9

2018
[16]

Dexcatch: Learning to catch arbitrary objects with dexterous hands,

F. Lan, S. Wang, Y . Zhang, H. Xu, O. Oseni, Y . Gao, and T. Zhang, “Dexcatch: Learning to catch arbitrary objects with dexterous hands,” in Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) , 2024

2024
[17]

Solving rubik’s cube with a robot hand,

I. Akkaya, M. Andrychowicz, M. Chociej, M. Litwin, B. McGrew, A. Petron, A. Paino, M. Plappert, G. Powell, R. Ribas et al., “Solving rubik’s cube with a robot hand,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.07113, 2019

1910 arXiv
[18]

Robopianist: Dexterous piano playing with deep reinforcement learning,

K. Zakka, P. Wu, L. Smith, N. Gileadi, T. Howell, X. B. Peng, S. Singh, Y . Tassa, P. Florence, A. Zeng, and P. Abbeel, “Robopianist: Dexterous piano playing with deep reinforcement learning,” inConference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2023

2023
[19]

Graspit! a versatile simulator for robotic grasping,

A. T. Miller and P. K. Allen, “Graspit! a versatile simulator for robotic grasping,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 110–122, 2004

2004
[20]

Real-time grasp detection using convo- lutional neural networks,

J. Redmon and A. Angelova, “Real-time grasp detection using convo- lutional neural networks,” in 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 1316–1322

2015
[21]

High precision grasp pose detection in dense clutter,

M. Gualtieri, A. Ten Pas, K. Saenko, and R. Platt, “High precision grasp pose detection in dense clutter,” in 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 598–605

2016
[22]

Unidexgrasp: Universal robotic dexterous grasping via learning diverse proposal generation and goal-conditioned policy,

Y . Xu, W. Wan, J. Zhang, H. Liu, Z. Shan, H. Shen, R. Wang, H. Geng, Y . Weng, J. Chen et al. , “Unidexgrasp: Universal robotic dexterous grasping via learning diverse proposal generation and goal-conditioned policy,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Visi...

2023
[23]

Hand-object contact con- sistency reasoning for human grasps generation,

H. Jiang, S. Liu, J. Wang, and X. Wang, “Hand-object contact con- sistency reasoning for human grasps generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , 2021, pp. 11 107–11 116

2021
[24]

Dvgg: Deep variational grasp generation for dextrous manipulation,

W. Wei, D. Li, P. Wang, Y . Li, W. Li, Y . Luo, and J. Zhong, “Dvgg: Deep variational grasp generation for dextrous manipulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1659–1666, 2022

2022
[25]

Realdex: Towards human-like grasping for robotic dexterous hand,

Y . Liu, Y . Yang, Y . Wang, X. Wu, J. Wang, Y . Yao, S. Schwertfeger, S. Yang, W. Wang, J. Yu et al., “Realdex: Towards human-like grasping for robotic dexterous hand,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13853 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[26]

Ugg: Unified generative grasping,

J. Lu, H. Kang, H. Li, B. Liu, Y . Yang, Q. Huang, and G. Hua, “Ugg: Unified generative grasping,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16917 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[27]

Diffusion-based generation, optimization, and planning in 3d scenes,

S. Huang, Z. Wang, P. Li, B. Jia, T. Liu, Y . Zhu, W. Liang, and S.-C. Zhu, “Diffusion-based generation, optimization, and planning in 3d scenes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 16 750–16 761

2023
[28]

Dexdiffuser: Gen- erating dexterous grasps with diffusion models,

Z. Weng, H. Lu, D. Kragic, and J. Lundell, “Dexdiffuser: Gen- erating dexterous grasps with diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02989, 2024

2024 arXiv
[29]

Multi-modal diffusion for hand- object grasp generation,

J. Cao, J. Liu, K. Kitani, and Y . Zhou, “Multi-modal diffusion for hand- object grasp generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04560 , 2024

2024
[30]

A bimanual manipulation taxonomy,

F. Krebs and T. Asfour, “A bimanual manipulation taxonomy,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11 031–11 038, 2022

2022
[31]

Learning grasp context distinc- tions that generalize,

R. Platt, R. A. Grupen, and A. H. Fagg, “Learning grasp context distinc- tions that generalize,” in 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots . IEEE, 2006, pp. 504–511

2006
[32]

Dual arm manipulation—a survey,

C. Smith, Y . Karayiannidis, L. Nalpantidis, X. Gratal, P. Qi, D. V . Dimarogonas, and D. Kragic, “Dual arm manipulation—a survey,” Robotics and Autonomous systems, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1340–1353, 2012

2012
[33]

Integrated grasp and motion planning,

N. Vahrenkamp, M. Do, T. Asfour, and R. Dillmann, “Integrated grasp and motion planning,” in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation . IEEE, 2010, pp. 2883–2888

2010
[34]

Task-based grasp adapta- tion on a humanoid robot,

J. Bohg, K. Welke, B. León, M. Do, D. Song, W. Wohlkinger, M. Madry, A. Aldóma, M. Przybylski, T. Asfour et al., “Task-based grasp adapta- tion on a humanoid robot,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 45, no. 22, pp. 779–786, 2012

2012
[35]

Planning pick-and-place tasks with two-hand regrasping,

J.-P. Saut, M. Gharbi, J. Cortés, D. Sidobre, and T. Siméon, “Planning pick-and-place tasks with two-hand regrasping,” in 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems . IEEE, 2010, pp. 4528–4533

2010
[36]

Learn- ing visuotactile skills with two multifingered hands,

T. Lin, Y . Zhang, Q. Li, H. Qi, B. Yi, S. Levine, and J. Malik, “Learn- ing visuotactile skills with two multifingered hands,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16823, 2024

2024 arXiv
[37]

The grasp taxonomy of human grasp types,

T. Feix, J. Romero, H.-B. Schmiedmayer, A. M. Dollar, and D. Kragic, “The grasp taxonomy of human grasp types,” IEEE Transactions on human-machine systems, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2015

2015
[38]

Pick and place planning for dual-arm ma- nipulators,

K. Harada, T. Foissotte, T. Tsuji, K. Nagata, N. Yamanobe, A. Naka- mura, and Y . Kawai, “Pick and place planning for dual-arm ma- nipulators,” in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2012, pp. 2281–2286

2012
[39]

Synthesis and optimization of force closure grasps via sequential semidefinite programming,

H. Dai, A. Majumdar, and R. Tedrake, “Synthesis and optimization of force closure grasps via sequential semidefinite programming,” Robotics Research: Volume 1, pp. 285–305, 2018

2018
[40]

Google scanned objects: A high- quality dataset of 3d scanned household items,

L. Downs, A. Francis, N. Koenig, B. Kinman, R. Hickman, K. Reymann, T. B. McHugh, and V . Vanhoucke, “Google scanned objects: A high- quality dataset of 3d scanned household items,” 2022

2022
[41]

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 6840– 6851, 2020

2020
[42]

Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation,

C. R. Qi, H. Su, K. Mo, and L. J. Guibas, “Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017, pp. 652–660

2017
[43]

Auto-encoding variational bayes,

D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013

2013 arXiv
[44]

Vi- sual whole-body control for legged loco-manipulation,

M. Liu, Z. Chen, X. Cheng, Y . Ji, R. Yang, and X. Wang, “Vi- sual whole-body control for legged loco-manipulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16967, 2024

2024 arXiv
[45]

Physdiff: Physics- guided human motion diffusion model,

Y . Yuan, J. Song, U. Iqbal, A. Vahdat, and J. Kautz, “Physdiff: Physics- guided human motion diffusion model,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 16 010–16 021

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [7]

Artigrasp: Physically plausible synthesis of bi-manual dexterous grasping and articulation,

H. Zhang, S. Christen, Z. Fan, L. Zheng, J. Hwangbo, J. Song, and O. Hilliges, “Artigrasp: Physically plausible synthesis of bi-manual dexterous grasping and articulation,” in 2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 235–246

work page 2024

[2] [1]

Bimanual grasp planning,

N. Vahrenkamp, M. Przybylski, T. Asfour, and R. Dillmann, “Bimanual grasp planning,” in 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 2011, pp. 493–499

work page 2011

[3] [2]

Ddgc: Generative deep dexterous grasping in clutter,

J. Lundell, F. Verdoja, and V . Kyrki, “Ddgc: Generative deep dexterous grasping in clutter,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 6899–6906, 2021

work page 2021

[4] [3]

Gendex- grasp: Generalizable dexterous grasping,

P. Li, T. Liu, Y . Li, Y . Geng, Y . Zhu, Y . Yang, and S. Huang, “Gendex- grasp: Generalizable dexterous grasping,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 8068–8074

2023

[5] [4]

Dexgraspnet: A large-scale robotic dexterous grasp dataset for general objects based on simulation,

R. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Chen, Y . Xu, P. Li, T. Liu, and H. Wang, “Dexgraspnet: A large-scale robotic dexterous grasp dataset for general objects based on simulation,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 11 359–11 366

work page 2023

[6] [5]

Grasp multiple objects with one hand,

Y . Li, B. Liu, Y . Geng, P. Li, Y . Yang, Y . Zhu, T. Liu, and S. Huang, “Grasp multiple objects with one hand,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

work page 2024

[7] [6]

Towards human-level bimanual dexterous ma- nipulation with reinforcement learning,

Y . Chen, T. Wu, S. Wang, X. Feng, J. Jiang, Z. Lu, S. McAleer, H. Dong, S.-C. Zhu, and Y . Yang, “Towards human-level bimanual dexterous ma- nipulation with reinforcement learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 5150–5163, 2022

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Bi-dexhands: Towards human-level bimanual dexterous manipulation,

Y . Chen, Y . Geng, F. Zhong, J. Ji, J. Jiang, Z. Lu, H. Dong, and Y . Yang, “Bi-dexhands: Towards human-level bimanual dexterous manipulation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2023

work page 2023