REVIEW 6 cited by
ThreatModeling-LLM: Automating Threat Modeling using Large Language Models for Banking System
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ThreatModeling-LLM: Automating Threat Modeling using Large Language Models for Banking System
read the original abstract
Threat modeling is a crucial component of cybersecurity, particularly for industries such as banking, where the security of financial data is paramount. Traditional threat modeling approaches require expert intervention and manual effort, often leading to inefficiencies and human error. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers a promising avenue for automating these processes, enhancing both efficiency and efficacy. However, this transition is not straightforward due to three main challenges: (1) the lack of publicly available, domain-specific datasets, (2) the need for tailored models to handle complex banking system architectures, and (3) the requirement for real-time, adaptive mitigation strategies that align with compliance standards like NIST 800-53. In this paper, we introduce ThreatModeling-LLM, a novel and adaptable framework that automates threat modeling for banking systems using LLMs. ThreatModeling-LLM operates in three stages: 1) dataset creation, 2) prompt engineering and 3) model fine-tuning. We first generate a benchmark dataset using Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool (TMT). Then, we apply Chain of Thought (CoT) and Optimization by PROmpting (OPRO) on the pre-trained LLMs to optimize the initial prompt. Lastly, we fine-tune the LLM using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) based on the benchmark dataset and the optimized prompt to improve the threat identification and mitigation generation capabilities of pre-trained LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Rectified Schr\"odinger Bridge Matching for Few-Step Visual Navigation
RSBM exploits velocity field invariance across regularization levels to achieve over 94% cosine similarity and 92% success in visual navigation using only 3 integration steps.
-
Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions
Across 74 OSINT/CTI AI studies, hallucination is widely named but end-to-end measured in only one non-reproducible system, so a human–AI co-pilot is the most defensible near-term architecture.
-
From Incomplete Architecture to Quantified Risk: Multimodal LLM-Driven Security Assessment for Cyber-Physical Systems
ASTRAL applies multimodal LLMs with prompt chaining and few-shot learning to synthesize CPS architectures from disparate sources, enabling adaptive threat identification and quantitative risk estimation, as supported ...
-
Rectified Schr\"odinger Bridge Matching for Few-Step Visual Navigation
Rectified Schrödinger Bridge Matching uses ε-invariant velocity structure and a learned prior so generative navigation policies reach ~94% cosine similarity and 92% success in three integration steps without distillation.
-
An Organization-Scoped LLM Agent Runtime Architecture for Regulated Cybersecurity Operations
Proposes a typed Security Context enforced across LLM agent components, Runtime Core, Tool Adapter Layer, and HITL gates for auditable, scoped cybersecurity workflows.
-
CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers
CyberAId is a proposed on-premise multi-agent system that coordinates LLM subagents with classical security tools to improve threat response and regulatory alignment in financial services.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.