Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.09563 v1 pith:XLYZKCRH submitted 2024-12-12 cs.LG cs.CL

Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models

classification cs.LG cs.CL
keywords intermediatelayersmodelsrepresentationrepresentationstrainingarchitecturalentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding what defines a good representation in large language models (LLMs) is fundamental to both theoretical understanding and practical applications. In this paper, we investigate the quality of intermediate representations in various LLM architectures, including Transformers and State Space Models (SSMs). We find that intermediate layers often yield more informative representations for downstream tasks than the final layers. To measure the representation quality, we adapt and apply a suite of metrics - such as prompt entropy, curvature, and augmentation-invariance - originally proposed in other contexts. Our empirical study reveals significant architectural differences, how representations evolve throughout training, and how factors like input randomness and prompt length affect each layer. Notably, we observe a bimodal pattern in the entropy of some intermediate layers and consider potential explanations tied to training data. Overall, our results illuminate the internal mechanics of LLMs and guide strategies for architectural optimization and training.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decomposing how prompting steers behavior

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A geometric decomposition framework shows that affine transformations best recover prompt-induced task geometry and behavior in language and vision models across multiple datasets.

  2. RACC: Representation-Aware Coverage Criteria for LLM Safety Testing

    cs.SE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RACC defines six representation-aware coverage criteria that score jailbreak test suites by measuring activation of safety concepts extracted from LLM hidden states on a calibration set.

  3. Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A recurrent-depth architecture enables language models to improve reasoning performance by iterating computation in latent space, achieving gains equivalent to much larger models on benchmarks.

  4. Prompt Compression via Activation Aggregation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A learned weighted sum of intermediate-layer activations compresses an instruction prompt into a single patch vector that, injected at an early layer, recovers task accuracy within ~2% of the full prompt.

  5. LLM Self-Recognition: Steering and Retrieving Activation Signatures

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Steering LLM residual streams with random sparse vectors creates detectable self-recognition fingerprints that enable over 98% accurate attribution of generated text to specific models without degrading output quality.

  6. Towards Understanding the Robustness of Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Integrating pretrained sparse autoencoders into LLM residual streams reduces jailbreak success rates by up to 5x across multiple models and attacks.

  7. GraphLoRA: Structure-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation for Large Language Model Recommendation

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Embedding a trainable graph message-passing network within the LoRA bottleneck of an LLM improves recommendation accuracy over prior collaborative-alignment methods at minimal parameter cost.

  8. Language-Pretraining-Induced Bias: A Strong Foundation for General Vision Tasks

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Random label bridge training aligns LLM parameters with vision tasks, and partial training of certain layers often suffices due to their foundational properties.

  9. ReGA: Model-Based Safeguard for LLMs via Representation-Guided Abstraction

    cs.CR 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ReGA uses safety-critical representations to guide abstraction in model-based analysis, enabling scalable detection of harmful LLM inputs with reported AUROC of 0.975 at prompt level.

  10. Gradient Smoothing: Coupling Layer-wise Updates for Improved Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Gradient Smoothing applies depth-wise smoothing to optimizer updates from base methods like Adam, yielding consistent gains in optimization and generalization on language, RL, diffusion, and vision tasks.

  11. Geometry of Human Perceptual Domains Emerges Transiently in LLM Representations

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Perceptual geometry for color, pitch, emotion and taste emerges transiently in intermediate layers of transformer LLMs despite purely textual training.