Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MaxInfoRL: Boosting exploration in reinforcement learning through information gain maximization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.12098 v2 pith:GOCB52UY submitted 2024-12-16 cs.LG cs.AIcs.RO

MaxInfoRL: Boosting exploration in reinforcement learning through information gain maximization

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.RO
keywords explorationrewardsintrinsicalgorithmsmaxinforlactionsapproachbalancing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms aim to balance exploiting the current best strategy with exploring new options that could lead to higher rewards. Most common RL algorithms use undirected exploration, i.e., select random sequences of actions. Exploration can also be directed using intrinsic rewards, such as curiosity or model epistemic uncertainty. However, effectively balancing task and intrinsic rewards is challenging and often task-dependent. In this work, we introduce a framework, MaxInfoRL, for balancing intrinsic and extrinsic exploration. MaxInfoRL steers exploration towards informative transitions, by maximizing intrinsic rewards such as the information gain about the underlying task. When combined with Boltzmann exploration, this approach naturally trades off maximization of the value function with that of the entropy over states, rewards, and actions. We show that our approach achieves sublinear regret in the simplified setting of multi-armed bandits. We then apply this general formulation to a variety of off-policy model-free RL methods for continuous state-action spaces, yielding novel algorithms that achieve superior performance across hard exploration problems and complex scenarios such as visual control tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. UBP2: Uncertainty-Balanced Preference Planning for Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    UBP2 uses ensembles of reward, dynamics, and value models to score trajectories on a unified objective of reward plus uncertainty, yielding sublinear regret bounds and higher sample efficiency on Meta-World than prior...

  2. Belief-Aware Scheduling for Predictive Wildfire Hazard Mapping under Sparse-Window Telemetry

    cs.ET 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper shows that deriving a structured belief from the prediction operator's needs and using it in non-myopic scheduling yields up to 28% better predictive loss than activity-paced baselines on a physics-calibrate...

  3. ModalImmune: Immunity Driven Unlearning via Self Destructive Training

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    ModalImmune enforces modality immunity in multimodal models by controlled collapse of input channels during training using adaptive regularizers and meta-optimization.