Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Baryogenesis from Primordial CP Violation

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a CP-violating inflaton phase in a three-Higgs-doublet model can leave a scalar excess that electroweak instantons convert into the baryon asymmetry.

desk verdict The inflationary construction is genuinely new and plausible, but the scalar-to-baryon conversion step violates B-L conservation, so the mechanism as written cannot produce the baryon asymmetry. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12957 v1 pith:B5MRAB36 submitted 2024-12-17 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

Venus Keus , Edward W. Kolb This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords baryogenesisCPviolationthree-Higgs-doubletmodelinflationscalarasymmetrysphaleronselectricdipolemomentsreheating
topics Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry
open problems Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a way to generate the baryon asymmetry of the Universe without introducing CP violation that would show up in electric dipole moments. It argues that a three-Higgs-doublet model, with two inert doublets acting as the inflaton and one active doublet as the Standard Model Higgs, can leave a CP-violating phase in the inflaton sector. During reheating, that phase makes the annihilation $\phi_1\phi_1 \to \phi\phi$ produce slightly more Higgs quanta than anti-quanta, with the excess proportional to $\mathrm{Im}[\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3]\,\mathrm{Im}[I_2]$. Once this scalar asymmetry is in the thermal bath, electroweak sphaleron processes convert it into baryon and lepton asymmetries, giving $Y_{\Delta B} = -(7/6)(T^3/s)(\mu_0/T)$ above the electroweak critical temperature. If correct, this gives a baryogenesis path in which the size of the CP violation is not constrained by EDM searches, and the same three-doublet sector can drive inflation and explain matter-antimatter asymmetry.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $Z_2$-symmetric three-Higgs-doublet scalar potential with complex couplings $\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3$ and a complex non-minimal gravitational coupling $\xi_4$. A proportional-field solution reduces the two inert doublets to a single effective inflaton with potential $(M_{\mathrm{Pl}}^4/4|\xi_4|^2)(1-e^{-2\tilde A/\sqrt{6}})^2 X(\theta_1,\theta_4)$, matching single-field inflation. The baryogenesis machinery is the interference between the tree and one-loop annihilation amplitudes into the active doublet, which creates the scalar number asymmetry, together with the chemical-potential network whose sphaleron condition $3\mu_{u_L}+\mu_{\nu_L}=0$ above the critical temperature converts the scalar asymmetry into $Y_{\Delta B}$. The mass ordering $m_{\phi_2}<m_{\phi_1}$ supplies the nonzero absorptive part $\mathrm{Im}[I_2]$.

What would settle it

Computing the complete one-loop absorptive part of the $\phi_1\phi_1\to\phi\phi$ amplitude would settle the claim: if the summed interference between tree and all loop diagrams has no imaginary part, or if $\mathrm{Im}[I_2]=0$ because $m_{\phi_2}>m_{\phi_1}$, the scalar asymmetry and therefore the baryon asymmetry vanish.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the combination of a complex non-minimal coupling to gravity and a complex quartic coupling in the inert sector of a $Z_2$-symmetric three-Higgs-doublet model produces a genuine asymmetry between active Higgs doublets and their antiparticles at reheating. The asymmetry is calculated from the interference of the tree-level amplitude $\phi_1\phi_1\to\phi\phi$, proportional to $\lambda_3$, with a one-loop bubble diagram containing $\phi_2$, proportional to $\lambda_1^* I_2 \lambda_2^*$; the difference of rates is $A^1_{CP} \propto \mathrm{Im}[\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3]\,\mathrm{Im}[I_2]$, nonzero when $\theta_1+\theta_2+\theta_3 \neq n\pi$ and when $m_{\phi_2}<m_{\phi_1}$ so that the loop can go on shell. Using chemical potentials for all Standard Model fermions, the Higgs, and the $W$ boson, with charge and isospin densities vanishing and sphaleron processes in equilibrium above the electroweak critical temperature, the paper derives $Y_{\Delta B} = -(7/6)(T^3/s)(\mu_0/T)$, so the scalar asymmetry feeds directly into a baryon asymmetry. Because the CP-violating couplings live only in the $Z_2$-odd inert sector, the model does not contribute to electric dipole moments at tree level. The paper presents this as a proof of concept rather than a fully specified model, leaving many couplings and masses free.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism assumes that the CP asymmetry found from the single one-loop bubble diagram with $\phi_2$ in the loop is not cancelled when all other diagrams contributing to $\phi_1\phi_1\to\phi\phi$ are included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Baryogenesis can proceed with CP violation confined to an inert scalar sector, so existing electric-dipole-moment limits do not constrain the size of the CP-violating phases.
  • A single three-Higgs-doublet framework can accommodate both inflation consistent with CMB measurements and a baryon asymmetry, because the quartic couplings can be tiny and the non-minimal coupling $|\xi_4|$ can be of order unity, avoiding the large coupling needed in one-doublet Higgs inflation.
  • The sign and magnitude of the baryon asymmetry are tied to $\mathrm{Im}[\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3]$ and to the mass ordering $m_{\phi_2}<m_{\phi_1}$, so measuring these parameters would determine whether the mechanism produces matter or antimatter.
  • Above the electroweak critical temperature the conversion gives $Y_{\Delta B}=-(7/6)(T^3/s)(\mu_0/T)$ and $Y_{\Delta L}=(51/24)(T^3/s)(\mu_0/T)$, locking baryon and lepton asymmetries in a fixed ratio; below the critical temperature the numerical coefficients change but the asymmetry does not vanish.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the inert doublets are discovered, their CP-mixed neutral states couple to the $Z$ and $W$ bosons, so gauge-boson processes could probe the same phases that set the baryon asymmetry; a future phenomenological study could connect these observables to collider signatures.
  • The same scalar sector contains a stable CP-mixed neutral state, so a combined calculation of the relic abundance and the baryon asymmetry could tie the dark-matter density to the size of the CP-violating phases in one parameter space.
  • Because the inflationary observables and the baryon asymmetry both depend on the quartic couplings and phases of the same potential, a global fit would correlate quantities such as the tensor-to-scalar ratio with the sign and magnitude of the produced baryon asymmetry, a connection the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new baryogenesis mechanism in a Z2-symmetric three-Higgs-doublet model. Two inert doublets with a complex nonminimal coupling to gravity drive inflation; after reheating, a CP asymmetry is claimed to be generated in the active doublet through interference of tree-level and one-loop diagrams, and the resulting chemical potential of the active doublet is then argued to yield baryon and lepton asymmetries via electroweak sphalerons. The inflationary analysis is developed in detail, while the baryogenesis part is presented as a proof of concept with a deferred loop computation.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism were established, it would be a novel and interesting route to baryogenesis with CP violation sequestered in a dark sector, evading EDM constraints. The inflationary analysis is concrete and yields predictions for ns, r, and As with an explicit parameter example. However, the crucial conversion step is invalid as written because it ignores B-L conservation, and the production step is only a schematic proportionality without a computed loop integral. The central claim of the abstract is therefore not supported by the present calculation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.2.1, Eqs. (4.12)-(4.18)] The chemical-potential solution violates B-L conservation. The scalar asymmetry produced in Sec. 4.1 carries no baryon or lepton number, and the Lagrangian in Eq. (2.1) contains no B-L-violating operators; electroweak sphalerons conserve B-L. Yet Eqs. (4.14) and (4.15) imply Y_DeltaB - Y_DeltaL = -(7/6 + 51/24) T^3/s mu0/T = -79/24 T^3/s mu0/T, which is non-zero whenever mu0 differs from zero. Imposing the required initial condition Y_DeltaB - Y_DeltaL = 0 on the system used in Sec. 4.2.1, namely Q=0, T3=0, and the sphaleron relation (4.16), forces mu0=0 and therefore Y_DeltaB=0. The mechanism therefore does not convert a pure scalar asymmetry into a baryon asymmetry as written.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.3)] The scalar CP asymmetry is not actually computed. Equation (4.3) gives A1_CP only up to an unspecified proportionality constant, and Im[I2] is never evaluated. The text explicitly states that a complete diagram calculation is deferred to future work and that "one needs to take into account all diagrams" because interferences might cancel the asymmetry. Without an evaluation of Im[I2], a check of the sign and magnitude, and a demonstration that other one-loop diagrams do not cancel the interference, the paper does not establish that a net scalar asymmetry is produced. Since this is the production step on which the entire mechanism rests, the central claim is not demonstrated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 1] The phrase "( non c'e' senza tre)" appears to be an unintended leftover from drafting and should be removed.
  2. [Sec. 2.2] There are typos: "scalers" should be "scalars", "in terms of of fields" has a duplicated "of", and "dependant" should be "dependent".
  3. [Sec. 2.2] The notation cθk and sθk is used in Eq. (2.10) but defined only later in the text; the definition should appear at first use.
  4. [Sec. 3] The statement that "we take the ranges -pi < theta1 < pi and 0 < theta4 < pi" is not motivated; since Fig. 2 shows the potential is insensitive to these angles, the ranges should be justified or removed.
  5. [Sec. 4.1] The reason for requiring m_phi2 < m_phi1 to satisfy Im[I2] != 0 is not explained; for a 2-to-2 process, the existence of an absorptive part depends on the kinematics and phase space, not only on the mass ordering.
  6. [Sec. 4.2] The chemical-potential calculation in Sec. 4.2 introduces a negative lepton asymmetry in Eq. (4.18), which combined with the positive baryon asymmetry gives nonzero B-L; this is connected to the major comment above and should be addressed there.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the baryogenesis derivation is self-contained and the final asymmetry is not an input to the model.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The scalar asymmetry in Eq. (4.3) is computed from the 3HDM Lagrangian via tree/loop interference, and the baryon asymmetry in Eqs. (4.14)-(4.18) follows from standard chemical-potential and sphaleron relations; no parameter is fitted to Y_DeltaB, and the final mu0 is an independent scalar-asymmetry input rather than a redefinition of the baryon asymmetry. The self-citations to Refs. [31-36] provide model context and motivation for dark-sector or inflationary CP violation, but the present paper's inflationary dynamics and baryogenesis calculation do not reduce to those citations; the prior work is not used as a uniqueness theorem to forbid alternatives. The one admitted incompleteness is explicitly stated in Sec. 4.1: only one bubble diagram is shown and the authors write 'one needs to take into account all diagrams... More careful analysis of these effects is deferred to a future work.' That is an acknowledged missing step in the production calculation, not a circular reduction. The reviewer-raised B-L conservation objection to Sec. 4.2 is a physical correctness question, not a circularity, and under the hard rules does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

All model-building ingredients beyond the Standard Model are assumptions: the Z2 symmetry, the inert doublets, the complex xi4, the proportional field trajectory, and chemical equilibrium. The only data-driven constraint is the normalization of X/|xi4|^2 to Planck's As; the baryon asymmetry is never matched to observation.

free parameters (5)
  • |xi4| = 1/6 (illustrative)
    Chosen with the quartic couplings so that X/|xi4|^2 is approximately 3.8e-10, matching the Planck scalar amplitude.
  • quartic couplings (lambda1, lambda12, lambda'12, lambda11, lambda22) = 8e-13, 9e-12, 1e-11, 1.1e-11, 1.15e-11
    Illustrative example satisfying vacuum stability and yielding X(theta1,theta4)=1e-11 at theta1=theta4=pi/3.
  • phases theta1 and theta4 = pi/3, pi/3
    Chosen as an example; theta1 controls lambda1 and theta4 controls xi4 in the inflationary potential.
  • phases theta2 and theta3 = unspecified
    The CP asymmetry in Eq. (4.3) requires sin(theta1+theta2+theta3) not equal to zero, but no values are given.
  • mass ordering m_phi2 < m_phi1 = assumed
    Needed for Im[I2] not equal to zero; no scalar mass spectrum is computed.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The Z2 symmetry gZ2=diag(-1,-1,+1) divides scalars into inert doublets with zero VEV and an active SM-like doublet, forbidding FCNCs.
    Fixed in Sec. 2.1 and used to restrict the scalar potential.
  • domain assumption The active doublet has zero VEV and negligible energy density during inflation.
    Stated in Sec. 2.2 to allow the inflationary potential to depend only on phi1 and phi2.
  • ad hoc to paper The proportional solution eta1=beta1 h1 and h2=beta2 h1 holds, with beta1 and beta2 fixed by minimizing X.
    Used in Eqs. (2.11), (2.22), and (2.23); reduces multi-field dynamics to one inflaton without a stability analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper The one-loop bubble diagram with only phi2 in the loop provides the absorptive part Im[I2], and no other loop cancels the CP asymmetry.
    Sec. 4.1 after Fig. 4; the paper says all diagrams must be included but defers this to future work.
  • domain assumption Above T_C all Standard Model Yukawa interactions, gauge interactions, and sphalerons are in equilibrium, and all quark and lepton generations share chemical potentials.
    Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.6)-(4.11); needed for the conversion formulas.
  • standard math Conformal transformation from the Jordan frame to the Einstein frame preserves physical predictions.
    Sec. 2.2, Ref. [38]; standard but load-bearing for the inflation predictions.
  • domain assumption The mass ordering m_phi2 < m_phi1 is assumed so that the loop integral has an absorptive part.
    Sec. 4.1 following Eq. (4.3); no mass spectrum is computed.
invented entities (2)
  • Two inert Higgs doublets phi1 and phi2
    purpose: Drive inflation, carry CP-violating phases, and annihilate into the active doublet to create a scalar asymmetry.
    New scalars with no independent detection and no falsifiable mass or coupling predictions in this paper.
  • Complex nonminimal coupling xi4 (phi1+ phi2) R
    purpose: Introduces CP violation in the gravitational sector and enables a small effective inflaton-gravity coupling.
    A model parameter with no observable predicted beyond the fitted CMB amplitude.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Baryogenesis from Primordial CP Violation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B5MRAB36

@misc{pith2026241212957,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Baryogenesis from Primordial CP Violation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B5MRAB36}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12957}
}
read the original abstract

We present a novel Baryogenesis mechanism in which an asymmetry of scalars in a three-Higgs doublet model produced exiting a CP-violating inflationary set-up is translated into an asymmetry of baryons through electroweak instantons.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Primordial Dirac Leptogenesis

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Baryogenesis can proceed via CP-violating inflaton decays that imprint an asymmetry in an inert Higgs doublet, which decays into Dirac neutrinos and is converted by sphalerons to the observed baryon asymmetry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [1207.7214]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys

    CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ 1207.7235]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    I. P. Ivanov and V. Keus, Zp scalar dark matter from multi-Higgs-doublet models , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 016004 [ 1203.3426]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Ma, Z(3) Dark Matter and Two-Loop Neutrino Mass , Phys

    E. Ma, Z(3) Dark Matter and Two-Loop Neutrino Mass , Phys. Lett. B 662 (2008) 49 [0708.3371]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Dark Discrete Gauge Symmetries

    B. Batell, Dark Discrete Gauge Symmetries , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 035006 [ 1007.0045]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Belanger and J.-C

    G. Belanger and J.-C. Park, Assisted freeze-out, JCAP 03 (2012) 038 [ 1112.4491]

    arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    Non-Abelian Discrete Dark Matter

    A. Adulpravitchai, B. Batell and J. Pradler, Non-Abelian Discrete Dark Matter , Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 207 [ 1103.3053]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    B´ elanger, A

    G. B´ elanger, A. Pukhov, C. E. Yaguna and O. Zapata, The Z 7 model of three-component scalar dark matter , JHEP 03 (2023) 100 [ 2212.07488]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Jurˇ ciukonis and L

    D. Jurˇ ciukonis and L. Lavoura,The centers of discrete groups as stabilizers of dark matter , PTEP 2023 (2023) 023B02 [ 2210.12133]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Aranda, D

    A. Aranda, D. Hern´ andez-Otero, J. Hern´ andez-Sanchez, V. Keus, S. Moretti, D. Rojas-Ciofalo et al., Z3 symmetric inert (2+1)-Higgs-doublet model , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015023 [1907.12470]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    V. Keus, S. F. King and S. Moretti, Three-Higgs-doublet models: symmetries, potentials and Higgs boson masses , JHEP 01 (2014) 052 [ 1310.8253]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    C. E. Yaguna and O. Zapata, Multi-component scalar dark matter from a ZN symmetry: a systematic analysis , JHEP 03 (2020) 109 [ 1911.05515]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Hirsch, S

    M. Hirsch, S. Morisi, E. Peinado and J. W. F. Valle, Discrete dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116003 [ 1007.0871]. – 17 –

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Electroweak baryogenesis, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 125003 [1206.2942]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov and M. E. Shaposhnikov, On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe , Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 36

    1985

  8. [16]

    Turok and J

    N. Turok and J. Zadrozny, Dynamical generation of baryons at the electroweak transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 2331

    1990

  9. [17]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Baryogenesis at the weak phase transition , Nucl. Phys. B 349 (1991) 727

    1991

  10. [18]

    Keus, Dark CP-violation through the Z-portal, Phys

    V. Keus, Dark CP-violation through the Z-portal, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 073007 [1909.09234]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    J.-O. Gong, H. M. Lee and S. K. Kang, Inflation and dark matter in two Higgs doublet models , JHEP 04 (2012) 128 [ 1202.0288]

    2012 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Choubey and A

    S. Choubey and A. Kumar, Inflation and Dark Matter in the Inert Doublet Model , JHEP 11 (2017) 080 [ 1707.06587]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Degrassi, S

    G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO , JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [ 1205.6497]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gonderinger, H

    M. Gonderinger, H. Lim and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Complex Scalar Singlet Dark Matter: Vacuum Stability and Phenomenology , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 043511 [ 1202.1316]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Elias-Miro, J

    J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, H. M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the Electroweak Vacuum by a Scalar Threshold Effect , JHEP 06 (2012) 031 [ 1203.0237]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Di Chiara, V

    S. Di Chiara, V. Keus and O. Lebedev, Stabilizing the Higgs potential with a Z ′, Phys. Lett. B 744 (2015) 59 [ 1412.7036]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton , Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703 [ 0710.3755]

    2008 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Rubio, Higgs inflation , Front

    J. Rubio, Higgs inflation , Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5 (2019) 50 [ 1807.02376]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Enqvist, S

    K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, T. Tenkanen and K. Tuominen, Standard Model with a real singlet scalar and inflation , JCAP 08 (2014) 035 [ 1407.0659]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Englert, T

    C. Englert, T. Plehn, D. Zerwas and P. M. Zerwas, Exploring the Higgs portal , Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 298 [ 1106.3097]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models , Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [ 1106.0034]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Keus, CP violation and BSM Higgs bosons , PoS CHARGED2016 (2016) 017 [1612.03629]

    V. Keus, CP violation and BSM Higgs bosons , PoS CHARGED2016 (2016) 017 [1612.03629]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Cordero-Cid, J

    A. Cordero-Cid, J. Hern´ andez-S´ anchez, V. Keus, S. F. King, S. Moretti, D. Rojas et al.,CP violating scalar Dark Matter , JHEP 12 (2016) 014 [ 1608.01673]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Cordero, J

    A. Cordero, J. Hernandez-Sanchez, V. Keus, S. F. King, S. Moretti, D. Rojas et al., Dark Matter Signals at the LHC from a 3HDM , JHEP 05 (2018) 030 [ 1712.09598]. – 18 –

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Cordero-Cid, J

    A. Cordero-Cid, J. Hern´ andez-S´ anchez, V. Keus, S. Moretti, D. Rojas and D. Soko lowska, Lepton collider indirect signatures of dark CP-violation , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 135 [1812.00820]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Cordero-Cid, J

    A. Cordero-Cid, J. Hern´ andez-S´ anchez, V. Keus, S. Moretti, D. Rojas-Ciofalo and D. Soko lowska,Collider signatures of dark CP -violation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095023 [2002.04616]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Keus, Dark origins of matter-antimatter asymmetry , PoS CORFU2019 (2020) 059 [2003.02141]

    V. Keus, Dark origins of matter-antimatter asymmetry , PoS CORFU2019 (2020) 059 [2003.02141]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Keus and K

    V. Keus and K. Tuominen, CP-violating inflation and its cosmological imprints , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 063533 [ 2102.07777]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    I. P. Ivanov, V. Keus and E. Vdovin, Abelian symmetries in multi-Higgs-doublet models , J. Phys. A 45 (2012) 215201 [ 1112.1660]

    2012 arXiv

  30. [38]

    D. I. Kaiser, Conformal Transformations with Multiple Scalar Fields , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 084044 [1003.1159]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results

    Planck collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [ 1807.06211]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. L. F. Barbon and J. R. Espinosa, On the Naturalness of Higgs Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 081302 [ 0903.0355]

    2009 arXiv

  33. [41]

    C. P. Burgess, H. M. Lee and M. Trott, Comment on Higgs Inflation and Naturalness , JHEP 07 (2010) 007 [ 1002.2730]

    2010 arXiv

  34. [42]

    M. P. Hertzberg, On Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling , JHEP 11 (2010) 023 [ 1002.2995]

    2010 arXiv

  35. [43]

    K. R. S. Balaji, T. Biswas, R. H. Brandenberger and D. London, Dynamical CP violation in the early universe, Phys. Lett. B 595 (2004) 22 [ hep-ph/0403014]

    2004 arXiv

  36. [44]

    K. R. S. Balaji, T. Biswas, R. H. Brandenberger and D. London, Dynamical CP violation in the early universe and leptogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 056005 [ hep-ph/0506013]

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Yanagida and M

    T. Yanagida and M. Yoshimura, Cosmological Amount of Baryons , Nucl. Phys. B 168 (1980) 534

    1980

  38. [46]

    D. V. Nanopoulos and S. Weinberg, Mechanisms for Cosmological Baryon Production , Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2484

    1979

  39. [47]

    J. A. Harvey, E. W. Kolb, D. B. Reiss and S. Wolfram, Calculation of Cosmological Baryon Asymmetry in Grand Unified Gauge Models , Nucl. Phys. B 201 (1982) 16

    1982

  40. [48]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, Grand Unified Theories and the Origin of the Baryon Asymmetry, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 33 (1983) 645

    1983

  41. [49]

    J. A. Harvey and M. S. Turner, Cosmological baryon and lepton number in the presence of electroweak fermion number violation , Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3344

    1990

  42. [50]

    Servant and S

    G. Servant and S. Tulin, Baryogenesis and Dark Matter through a Higgs Asymmetry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 151601 [ 1304.3464]

    2013 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Davidson, R

    S. Davidson, R. Gonz´ alez Felipe, H. Serˆ odio and J. P. Silva,Baryogenesis through split Higgsogenesis, JHEP 11 (2013) 100 [ 1307.6218]. – 19 –

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.