Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantifying Public Response to COVID-19 Events: Introducing the Community Sentiment and Engagement Index

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A weighted index of 13 Reddit signals tracks public response to 15 COVID-19 events.

desk verdict A concrete and fully disclosed composite index, but the event-response validation is statistically invalid and in-sample, so the central claim does not hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16925 v1 pith:N6KCX46U submitted 2024-12-22 cs.SI cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

Nirmalya Thakur , Kesha A. Patel , Audrey Poon , Shuqi Cui , Nazif Azizi , Rishika Shah , Riyan Shah This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SIcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords CommunitySentimentandEngagementIndexCSEIanalysisRedditCOVID-19discourseprincipalcomponentfine-grainedemotionsmetricsevent-drivenshifts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a single daily number, the Community Sentiment and Engagement Index (CSEI), that summarizes the emotional state and participation level of COVID-19 discussion on Reddit. The index combines 13 measures—overall sentiment, seven fine-grained emotions, posting volume, domain diversity, readability, and offensiveness—into a weighted average, with weights chosen by principal component analysis. The authors claim that when this number is plotted day by day, its peaks, valleys, and cumulative shifts align with 15 major pandemic events, from the WHO pandemic declaration to vaccine approvals, and that the alignment is statistically significant ($p=0.0428$). If right, CSEI gives public-health communicators a near-real-time, text-based barometer of how communities react to crisis events.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the PCA-weighted linear formula $\mathrm{CSEI}(t)=\sum_i w_i X_i^{\mathrm{norm}}(t)$, where each $X_i$ is a daily feature computed from Reddit posts and each $w_i$ is the loading of that feature on the first principal component. The 13 features are compound sentiment, daily post count, daily total score, readability, offensiveness, domain diversity, and seven fine-grained emotion shares (fear, surprise, joy, sadness, anger, disgust, neutral). Features are min-max normalized before weighting, which keeps high-count variables from swamping subtle emotion signals while still letting domain diversity and post volume contribute strongly. Peaks and valleys are detected on a 7-day moving average of the daily differences, and an event indicator feeds the Pearson test that links CSEI movement to the 15 pandemic events.

What would settle it

Recompute CSEI on the same corpus after removing the subreddit that provides 18.86% of posts and the automated news subreddits; if the $p=0.0428$ event correlation disappears or changes sign, the index is tracking those sources rather than community sentiment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that CSEI, a fixed-weight linear combination of 13 normalized Reddit discourse features, captures both the direction and intensity of public response to COVID-19 milestones. The weights come from the loadings of the first principal component, so features that explain more variance in the data carry more weight; the reported equation is Eq. 16, with domain diversity highest at 0.1761, followed by compound sentiment at 0.1398 and offensiveness at 0.1386. The authors show that each constituent feature correlates significantly with the index ($p<0.05$), and that a 7-day rolling mean of CSEI exhibits peaks and valleys whose dates line up with the 15 selected events. They further report a Pearson correlation between daily CSEI changes and an event-day indicator at $p=0.0428$, interpreting this as evidence that the index can infer and interpret shifts in public sentiment and engagement around major events.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the 4.5 million Reddit posts—more than a fifth of them from a single news subreddit and several automated accounts—represent what the public actually felt and engaged with, rather than the posting habits of a few bots and one community.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A daily CSEI time series can serve as a monitoring tool: a sharp rise after an announcement signals elevated public anxiety or attention, and a valley signals that attention is returning to baseline.
  • Because the weights are fixed while the feature values move with new posts, the index can be re-run on fresh days of the same crisis to score later events against the same scale.
  • CSEI extends sentiment analysis beyond positive/negative polarity by treating engagement breadth, civility, and fine-grained emotions as first-class components of community response.
  • The event correlation at $p=0.0428$ suggests the index is sensitive enough to distinguish event days from ordinary days, which is the property needed for real-time crisis communication.
  • The methodology can be transferred to other public-health crises by recomputing the feature set and PCA weights on a new Reddit corpus.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The validation uses only 15 event indicators spread over 20 months, so the Pearson test has low statistical power; a stronger test would shuffle event dates and compare the observed correlation against that null distribution.
  • Because the corpus is dominated by a single subreddit and several automated news feeds, the index may partly measure news-bot posting volume rather than human sentiment; reweighting the corpus by subreddit would test this.
  • An increase in CSEI is not automatically an improvement in community well-being, since offensiveness and high engagement enter positively; readers should interpret CSEI as discourse intensity plus expressed emotion rather than as a health score.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Community Sentiment and Engagement Index (CSEI), a fixed-weight linear combination of 13 normalized Reddit discourse features (compound sentiment, engagement, readability, offensiveness, fine-grained emotions, domain diversity), with weights derived from the first principal component of a PCA on 4,510,178 COVID-19-related Reddit posts. The authors report that CSEI correlates significantly with its constituent features (all p<0.05), that cumulative CSEI changes show peaks and valleys aligned with 15 selected COVID-19 events, and that a Pearson correlation between daily CSEI changes and a binary event indicator yields p=0.0428. They conclude that CSEI is a sensitive composite barometer of public sentiment and engagement during the pandemic.

Significance. If the claims were properly supported, CSEI would be a useful addition to the toolbox for monitoring public discourse during health crises, and the paper's explicit feature definitions and open weight formula would aid reproducibility. The authors also engage with a very large dataset and apply standard NLP models (VADER, DistilRoBERTa emotion classification, RoBERTa offensiveness, Flesch Reading Ease), which is a strength. However, the paper's central validation is currently in-sample and statistically fragile: the event-response evidence rests on a single borderline p-value from a test whose assumptions are violated, and the 'internal consistency' check is definitionally trivial. The significance of the contribution is therefore not established by the analyses as presented.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (16) and p=0.0428] The claim that CSEI responds to major COVID-19 events is supported by a Pearson correlation between daily CSEI changes and a binary event indicator E_t, reported only as p=0.0428. This test is statistically invalid as reported. The predictor has 15 ones among roughly 622 days, the response is the first difference of a 7-day moving average (Section III, Eqs. 7–8), which induces strong serial dependence; ordinary Pearson p-values assume independent observations, so the effective sample size is far below 622 and the p-value cannot be trusted. The paper also does not report the correlation coefficient r, a confidence interval, or a sensitivity analysis dropping individual events; with only 15 events, one or two influential dates could drive the marginal p=0.0428. A valid analysis would need to account for autocorrelation (e.g., a permutation or block-bootstrap test) and should report effect size.
  2. [Section III–IV, PCA weighting and event validation] The validation is in-sample in two reinforcing ways. First, the PCA weights in Eq. (16) are estimated from the full 4.5M-post dataset, and the same dataset is then used to test event alignment of the resulting CSEI series; there is no train/validation split, temporal holdout, or out-of-sample check. Second, the 15 events, the peak/valley prominence thresholds, and the moving-average window are selected after inspecting the same series, so the reported alignment of peaks and valleys with events is at least partly post hoc. Without an out-of-sample or pre-registered analysis, the event-correlation evidence cannot be interpreted as confirmatory.
  3. [Section IV, Figure 1 and surrounding text] The internal-consistency check—CSEI correlates significantly with each of its constituent features—is definitional. Since CSEI is a weighted average of exactly those 13 normalized features (Eq. 16), any non-degenerate weighting will produce nonzero correlations; high correlations with constituents do not demonstrate that CSEI captures meaningful sentiment and engagement dynamics beyond being a weighted sum of its inputs. This is not evidence of sensitivity to external events. The paper should either present a benchmark against simpler baselines (e.g., an equally weighted average, or a single-feature index) or use external criteria.
  4. [Section III, first paragraph and dataset description] The representativeness of the dataset is a load-bearing assumption for the paper's global claims. The paper itself reports that u_toronto_news contributes 18.86% of posts and autonewspaper another 3.58%, with several other news-bot subreddits (newsbotbot, innews, stardiapostcom, nofeenews) in the top 20. If this composition reflects a scraping or collection artifact rather than the actual distribution of public COVID-19 discourse, then the CSEI time series and the event correlations may largely reflect the posting patterns of a small number of automated or local news accounts. The paper should at least quantify the sensitivity of the CSEI to removal of these dominant subreddits, and should temper claims about 'global' public sentiment accordingly.
  5. [Section IV, event selection and peak/valley analysis] The event-response analysis uses 15 events that are selected post hoc from a known timeline, with no explicit hypothesis about how each event should affect CSEI (direction, magnitude, lag). The peak/valley identification in Eqs. (9)–(13) depends on unspecified distance d and prominence threshold p, and the reported 'alignment' between peaks/valleys and events is not accompanied by any formal matching criterion or statistical test. Given the multiple testing inherent in scanning a 622-day series for 15 event dates, the nominal p=0.0428 does not survive even a mild multiple-comparison correction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The displayed equations appear to be missing in the manuscript text (only equation numbers and prose remain); the paper should ensure all equations are rendered, including Eqs. (1)–(15).
  2. [Section IV, p-value reporting] The text reports only the p-value for the event correlation; it should report the Pearson r, its confidence interval, and the effective sample size or the method used to account for autocorrelation.
  3. [Section IV, Figure 1] The figure caption says 'Person's p-values' (typo for Pearson); also, the figure is referenced but not shown in the text, so the reader cannot verify the claimed r-values.
  4. [Section III, outlier removal] The PCA outlier-removal step uses thresholds ('score below 25 for PC1' and 'at least 7.5 for PC2') that are not justified; it is unclear how these cutoff values were chosen and whether they materially affect the resulting weights.
  5. [Section V, limitations] The limitations paragraph acknowledges that the CSEI formula may vary with new data, but this is a general caveat; the paper should also explicitly acknowledge the in-sample validation and statistical issues discussed above.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The claimed 'internal consistency and sensitivity' of CSEI to its own constituent features is a definitional check, not an external validation; the event-based benchmark is not circular and gives the central claim independent content.

  1. self definitional [Section IV, paragraph following Eq. (16)]
    "The findings of Pearson’s correlation analysis of CSEI with each of its constituent features are shown in Figure 1, where the r-values are shown. Person’s p-values were also computed, and the findings showed that CSEI has a statistically significant correlation with each of its constituent terms as the p-values for each of these correlations were less than 0.05."

    Equation (16) defines CSEI as a weighted linear combination of these same 13 features with positive coefficients. Hence Cov(CSEI, X_i) = w_i Var(X_i) + sum_{j≠i} w_j Cov(X_j, X_i), so significant correlations between the index and its own inputs are inherited from the construction rather than discovered. Reporting them as evidence that CSEI is 'sensitive to specific sentiment dimensions' is a self-definitional check: the index cannot be independent of the variables from which it was built. This supports arithmetic consistency only, not event sensitivity or external validity.

full rationale

The only reduction-by-construction step I can exhibit is the internal-consistency correlation: because Eq. (16) is a positive weighted sum of the very features correlated with it, those p-values are mechanically expected and do not validate sensitivity. The paper's central event claim, by contrast, is not circular in the definitional sense: the event indicator is an external binary time series, and it is logically possible for CSEI to fail to correlate with it, so the p=0.0428 result carries independent content even though it is in-sample, based on only 15 event days, and computed on an autocorrelated smoothed series. Those are statistical-validity concerns, not circularity. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. I therefore assign 4: one definitional validation inflates the evidence, but the central claim does not reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The index rests on a large set of fitted weights and hand-chosen thresholds, plus domain assumptions about Reddit representativeness and the validity of off-the-shelf NLP models. The most serious burden is that the same data are used to fit the weights and to validate the event correlation, so the ledger contains no independent external benchmark.

free parameters (5)
  • PCA-derived weights for 13 CSEI components = 0.1398 (compound), 0.0057 (score), 0.1183 (post count), 0.0438 (readability), 0.1386 (offensive), 0.1761 (domain…
    Estimated by PCA on the full dataset; the central index formula depends entirely on these fitted coefficients.
  • Isolation Forest contamination rate = 0.5%
    Chosen by hand for outlier removal; not justified and affects which posts remain in the dataset.
  • PCA outlier removal thresholds = PC1 score < 25 and PC2 score >= 7.5
    Arbitrary thresholds used to delete additional anomalies before sentiment analysis; may bias the sample.
  • Event set of 15 COVID-19 dates = 15 dates from Feb 11 2020 to Sep 14 2021
    Hand-selected from the CDC timeline; the p=0.0428 correlation depends on this selection and no robustness check is provided.
  • Moving average window w = 7 days
    Chosen for smoothing; affects peak and valley detection and event alignment, but no sensitivity analysis is reported.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Reddit posts are a representative proxy for global public sentiment and engagement during COVID-19.
    The entire CSEI and event validation treat 4.5M Reddit posts as evidence about public sentiment; Section III uses this dataset without population weighting.
  • domain assumption The Kaggle dataset's subreddit distribution is unbiased, or at least not dominated by automated news accounts.
    u_toronto_news alone is 18.86% of posts; if this is a scraper artifact, the index reflects it. Section III, dataset description.
  • ad hoc to paper The first principal component of the normalized feature matrix captures meaningful sentiment and engagement dynamics rather than volume or noise.
    PCA weighting (Eq. 2) assumes PC1 loadings are a valid basis for feature importance; no variance explained or component interpretation is reported. Section III.
  • standard math Daily CSEI changes are independent observations for Pearson correlation.
    Pearson's p-value in Eq. 15 assumes independent samples; a daily time series is autocorrelated, so the reported p=0.0428 is likely anti-conservative. Section IV.
  • domain assumption The DistilRoBERTa emotion model and Twitter-RoBERTa offensive model produce valid labels for Reddit text.
    The fine-grain sentiment and offensiveness features come from models trained on other text distributions; no validation on Reddit is provided. Section III.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantifying Public Response to COVID-19 Events: Introducing the Community Sentiment and Engagement Index." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N6KCX46U

@misc{pith2026241216925,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantifying Public Response to COVID-19 Events: Introducing the Community Sentiment and Engagement Index},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N6KCX46U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16925}
}
read the original abstract

This study introduces the Community Sentiment and Engagement Index (CSEI), developed to capture nuanced public sentiment and engagement variations on social media, particularly in response to major events related to COVID-19. Constructed with diverse sentiment indicators, CSEI integrates features like engagement, daily post count, compound sentiment, fine-grain sentiments (fear, surprise, joy, sadness, anger, disgust, and neutral), readability, offensiveness, and domain diversity. Each component is systematically weighted through a multi-step Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-based framework, prioritizing features according to their variance contributions across temporal sentiment shifts. This approach dynamically adjusts component importance, enabling CSEI to precisely capture high-sensitivity shifts in public sentiment. The development of CSEI showed statistically significant correlations with its constituent features, underscoring internal consistency and sensitivity to specific sentiment dimensions. CSEI's responsiveness was validated using a dataset of 4,510,178 Reddit posts about COVID-19. The analysis focused on 15 major events, including the WHO's declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, the first reported cases of COVID-19 across different countries, national lockdowns, vaccine developments, and crucial public health measures. Cumulative changes in CSEI revealed prominent peaks and valleys aligned with these events, indicating significant patterns in public sentiment across different phases of the pandemic. Pearson correlation analysis further confirmed a statistically significant relationship between CSEI daily fluctuations and these events (p = 0.0428), highlighting the capacity of CSEI to infer and interpret shifts in public sentiment and engagement in response to major events related to COVID-19.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Integrating Zero-Shot Classification to Advance Long COVID Literature: A Systematic Social Media-Centered Review

    cs.SI 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A literature review uses zero-shot transformer classification to organize 40 Long COVID social media studies into four themes, with no external validation and no shared artifacts.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Covid-19 — navigating the uncharted,

    A. S. Fauci, H. C. Lane, and R. R. Redfield, “Covid-19 — navigating the uncharted,” N. Engl. J. Med. , vol. 382, no. 13, pp. 1268 –1269, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    WHO declares COVID -19 a pandemic,

    D. Cucinotta and M. Vanelli, “WHO declares COVID -19 a pandemic,” Acta Biomed, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 157–160, 2020

    2020

  3. [3]

    COVID-19 cases,

    “COVID-19 cases,” datadot. [Online]. Available: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=o. [Accessed: 10 - Nov-2024]

    2024

  4. [4]

    A scoping review of the impacts of COVID-19 physical distancing measures on vulnerable population groups,

    L. Li, A. Taeihagh, and S. Y. Tan, “A scoping review of the impacts of COVID-19 physical distancing measures on vulnerable population groups,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    The impact of COVID-19 on youth mental health: A mixed methods survey,

    I. H. Bell et al., “The impact of COVID-19 on youth mental health: A mixed methods survey,” Psychiatry Res. , vol. 321, no. 115082, p. 115082, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    The bright and dark sides of social media use during COVID-19 lockdown: Contrasting social media effects through social liability vs. social support,

    H. Cho, P. Li, A. Ngien, M. G. Tan, A. Chen, and E. Nekmat, “The bright and dark sides of social media use during COVID-19 lockdown: Contrasting social media effects through social liability vs. social support,” Comput. Human Behav. , vol. 146, no. 107795, p. 107795, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Thakur and C

    N. Thakur and C. Han, “An exploratory study of tweets about the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: Insights from sentiment analysis, language interpretation, source tracking, type classification, and embedded URL detection,” COVID, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1026 –1049, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Social media role and its impact on public health: A narrative review,

    S. Kanchan and A. Gaidhane, “Social media role and its impact on public health: A narrative review,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 1, p. e33737, 2023

    2023

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Investigation of the misinformation about COVID -19 on YouTube using topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and language analysis,

    N. Thakur, S. Cui, V. Knieling, K. Khanna, and M. Shao, “Investigation of the misinformation about COVID -19 on YouTube using topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and language analysis,” Computation (Basel), vol. 12, no. 2, p. 28, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Reddit.com web visitor traffic 2024,

    “Reddit.com web visitor traffic 2024,” Statista. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/443332/reddit-monthly-visitors. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  3. [11]

    Reddit.com desktop traffic share 2023,

    “Reddit.com desktop traffic share 2023,” Statista. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/325144/reddit-global-active-user- distribution/. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2023

  4. [12]

    Countries with the highest monthly traffic volume to Reddit.com 2024,

    “Countries with the highest monthly traffic volume to Reddit.com 2024,” Statista. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1453911/redditcom-monthly- visits-by-country. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  5. [13]

    Top social media traffic referrers to Reddit.com 2023,

    “Top social media traffic referrers to Reddit.com 2023,” Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/280557/top-social-media-traffic- referrers-to-redditcom/. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2023

  6. [14]

    Web users of Reddit.com 2024,

    “Web users of Reddit.com 2024,” Statista. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1310710/redditcom-monthly- users. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  7. [15]

    Reddit average visit length per user worldwide 2022-2024,

    “Reddit average visit length per user worldwide 2022-2024,” Statista. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1310716/redditcom-time-spent- per-visit. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2022

  8. [16]

    Sentiment Analysis on Reddit Trading Data,

    Govinda, A. Chintalapati, A. Senapati, and K. Enkhbat, “Sentiment Analysis on Reddit Trading Data,” in 2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE), 2024, pp. 1–7

    2024

  9. [17]

    Behaviours and attitudes in response to the COVID- 19 pandemic: insights from a cross -national Facebook survey,

    D. Perrotta et al., “Behaviours and attitudes in response to the COVID- 19 pandemic: insights from a cross -national Facebook survey,” EPJ Data Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 17, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Measuring the outreach efforts of public health authorities and the public response on Facebook during the COVID -19 pandemic in early 2020: Cross - country comparison,

    A. Sesagiri Raamkumar, S. G. Tan, and H. L. Wee, “Measuring the outreach efforts of public health authorities and the public response on Facebook during the COVID -19 pandemic in early 2020: Cross - country comparison,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 5, p. e19334, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Sentiment analysis and text analysis of the public discourse on Twitter about COVID -19 and MPox,

    N. Thakur, “Sentiment analysis and text analysis of the public discourse on Twitter about COVID -19 and MPox,” Big Data Cogn. Comput., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 116, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Investigation of the gender -specific discourse about online learning during COVID -19 on Twitter using sentiment analysis, subjectivity analysis, and toxicity analysis,

    N. Thakur, S. Cui, K. Khanna, V. Knieling, Y. N. Duggal, and M. Shao, “Investigation of the gender -specific discourse about online learning during COVID -19 on Twitter using sentiment analysis, subjectivity analysis, and toxicity analysis,” Computers, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 221, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?,

    H. O.-Y. Li, A. Bailey, D. Huynh, and J. Chan, “YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?,” BMJ Glob. Health, vol. 5, no. 5, p. e002604, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    YouTube as a source of information on the COVID -19 pandemic,

    R. Andika, C. T. Kao, C. Williams, Y. J. Lee, H. Al -Battah, and R. Alweis, “YouTube as a source of information on the COVID -19 pandemic,” J. Community Hosp. Intern. Med. Perspect., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 39–41, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Teaching English in a virtual classroom using Whatsapp during COVID-19 pandemic,

    R. Asmara, “Teaching English in a virtual classroom using Whatsapp during COVID-19 pandemic,” Language and Education Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    The application of WhatsApp to support online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia,

    H. Mulyono, G. Suryoputro, and S. R. Jamil, “The application of WhatsApp to support online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 8, p. e07853, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    COVID-19 on Instagram: A content analysis of selected accounts,

    F. Niknam, M. Samadbeik, F. Fatehi, M. Shirdel, M. Rezazadeh, and P. Bastani, “COVID-19 on Instagram: A content analysis of selected accounts,” Health Policy Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 165–173, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Public health agencies outreach through Instagram during the COVID -19 pandemic: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication perspective,

    A. Malik, M. L. Khan, and A. Quan -Haase, “Public health agencies outreach through Instagram during the COVID -19 pandemic: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication perspective,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 61, no. 102346, p. 102346, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Characterizing COVID -19 content posted to TikTok: Public sentiment and response during the first phase of the COVID -19 pandemic,

    L. Southwick, S. C. Guntuku, E. V. Klinger, E. Seltzer, H. J. McCalpin, and R. M. Merchant, “Characterizing COVID -19 content posted to TikTok: Public sentiment and response during the first phase of the COVID -19 pandemic,” J. Adolesc. Health , vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 234–241, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Dissemination of misinformation about COVID-19 on TikTok: A multimodal analysis,

    K. A. Patel and N. Thakur, “Dissemination of misinformation about COVID-19 on TikTok: A multimodal analysis,” in Communications in Computer and Information Science, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 109–120

    2024

  21. [29]

    Using WeChat, a Chinese social media app, for early detection of the COVID-19 outbreak in December 2019: Retrospective study,

    W. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Jia, Y. Li, and S. Dang, “Using WeChat, a Chinese social media app, for early detection of the COVID-19 outbreak in December 2019: Retrospective study,” JMIR MHealth UHealth, vol. 8, no. 10, p. e19589, 2020

    2019

  22. [30]

    Factors influencing anxiety among WeChat users during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China: Cross-sectional survey study,

    C. Zou et al. , “Factors influencing anxiety among WeChat users during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China: Cross-sectional survey study,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 23, no. 5, p. e24412, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    The impact of COVID- 19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users,

    S. Li, Y. Wang, J. Xue, N. Zhao, and T. Zhu, “The impact of COVID- 19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health , vol. 17, no. 6, p. 2032, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Concerns expressed by Chinese social media users during the COVID -19 pandemic: Content analysis of Sina Weibo microblogging data,

    J. Wang, Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, R. Evans, and C. Zhu, “Concerns expressed by Chinese social media users during the COVID -19 pandemic: Content analysis of Sina Weibo microblogging data,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 11, p. e22152, 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    The Reddit COVID dataset,

    Lexyr, “The Reddit COVID dataset,” 02 -Nov-2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pavellexyr/the -reddit- covid-dataset?select=the-reddit-covid-dataset-posts.csv. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2021

  26. [34]

    Sentiment analysis unleashed: Leveraging VADER for evaluation of public opinion,

    S. Arora, A. Malhotra, A. Kumar, and N. Singh, “Sentiment analysis unleashed: Leveraging VADER for evaluation of public opinion,” in 2024 11th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  27. [35]

    MonkeyPox2022Tweets: A large-scale Twitter dataset on the 2022 Monkeypox outbreak, findings from analysis of Tweets, and open research questions,

    N. Thakur, “MonkeyPox2022Tweets: A large-scale Twitter dataset on the 2022 Monkeypox outbreak, findings from analysis of Tweets, and open research questions,” Infect. Dis. Rep., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 855 – 883, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Sentiment analysis of Indian Tweets about Covid-19 vaccines,

    A. A. Mir and R. Sevukan, “Sentiment analysis of Indian Tweets about Covid-19 vaccines,” J. Inf. Sci., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1308–1320, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    A comprehensive analysis and investigation of the public discourse on twitter about exoskeletons from 2017 to 2023,

    N. Thakur, K. A. Patel, A. Poon, R. Shah, N. Azizi, and C. Han, “A comprehensive analysis and investigation of the public discourse on twitter about exoskeletons from 2017 to 2023,” Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 346, 2023

    2017

  30. [38]

    A multilingual corpus for panic and worry in code -mixed tweets by VADER sentiment analysis,

    F. Fahmi, “A multilingual corpus for panic and worry in code -mixed tweets by VADER sentiment analysis,” J. Appl. Data Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1038–1051, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    A large -scale dataset of Twitter chatter about online learning during the current COVID-19 Omicron wave,

    N. Thakur, “A large -scale dataset of Twitter chatter about online learning during the current COVID-19 Omicron wave,” Data (Basel), vol. 7, no. 8, p. 109, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    A tutorial on principal component analysis,

    S. Jonathon, “A tutorial on principal component analysis,” arXiv [cs.LG], 2014

    2014

  33. [41]

    Linear aggregation with weighted ranking,

    R. A. Nasibova and E. N. Nasibov, “Linear aggregation with weighted ranking,” Autom. Contr. Comput. Sci. , vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 96 –102, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    Pearson’s correlation coefficient,

    P. Sedgwick, “Pearson’s correlation coefficient,” BMJ, vol. 345, no. jul04 1, pp. e4483–e4483, 2012

    2012

  35. [43]

    Perspectives of the COVID-19 pandemic on Reddit: Comparative natural language processing study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia,

    M. Hu and M. Conway, “Perspectives of the COVID-19 pandemic on Reddit: Comparative natural language processing study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia,” JMIR Infodemiology, vol. 2, no. 2, p. e36941, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Reddit as a Source of COVID- 19 Information: A Content Analysis of r/coronavirus during the Early Pandemic,

    B. Hale, M. Alberta, and S. W. Chae, “Reddit as a Source of COVID- 19 Information: A Content Analysis of r/coronavirus during the Early Pandemic,” Journal of Communication Technology , vol. 5, no. 1, p. 26, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Using crowdsourced medicine to manage uncertainty on Reddit: The case of COVID -19 long-haulers,

    C. M. Thompson, K. B. Rhidenour, K. G. Blackburn, A. K. Barrett, and S. Babu, “Using crowdsourced medicine to manage uncertainty on Reddit: The case of COVID -19 long-haulers,” Patient Educ. Couns., vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 322–330, 2022

    2022

  38. [46]

    Using social media Reddit data to examine foster families’ concerns and needs during COVID - 19,

    J. Y. Lee, O. D. Chang, and T. Ammari, “Using social media Reddit data to examine foster families’ concerns and needs during COVID - 19,” Child Abuse Negl., vol. 121, no. 105262, p. 105262, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Mining long -COVID symptoms from Reddit: characterizing post-COVID syndrome from patient reports,

    A. Sarker and Y. Ge, “Mining long -COVID symptoms from Reddit: characterizing post-COVID syndrome from patient reports,” JAMIA Open, vol. 4, no. 3, p. ooab075, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    The effect of toxicity on COVID -19 news network formation in political subcommunities on Reddit: An affiliation network approach,

    W. Chipidza, “The effect of toxicity on COVID -19 news network formation in political subcommunities on Reddit: An affiliation network approach,” Int. J. Inf. Manage. , vol. 61, no. 102397, p. 102397, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Reddit users’ experiences of suicidal thoughts during the COVID -19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis of r/Covid19_support posts,

    A. Slemon, C. McAuliffe, T. Goodyear, L. McGuinness, E. Shaffer, and E. K. Jenkins, “Reddit users’ experiences of suicidal thoughts during the COVID -19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis of r/Covid19_support posts,” Front. Public Health, vol. 9, 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    How dramatic events can affect emotionality in social posting: The impact of COVID -19 on Reddit,

    V. Basile, F. Cauteruccio, and G. Terracina, “How dramatic events can affect emotionality in social posting: The impact of COVID -19 on Reddit,” Future Internet, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 29, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Reddit language indicates changes associated with diet, physical activity, substance use, and smoking during COVID - 19,

    K. Wanchoo, M. Abrams, R. M. Merchant, L. Ungar, and S. C. Guntuku, “Reddit language indicates changes associated with diet, physical activity, substance use, and smoking during COVID - 19,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 2, p. e0280337, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    COVID - 19 and mental health/substance use disorders on reddit: A longitudinal study,

    A. Alambo, S. Padhee, T. Banerjee, and K. Thirunarayan, “COVID - 19 and mental health/substance use disorders on reddit: A longitudinal study,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 20–27

    2021

  45. [53]

    Exploration of gender differences in COVID-19 discourse on Reddit,

    A. Jai, R. Ella, and S. Suzanne, “Exploration of gender differences in COVID-19 discourse on Reddit,” arXiv [cs.CL], 2020

    2020

  46. [54]

    Characterizing discourse about COVID- 19 vaccines: A Reddit version of the pandemic story,

    W. Wu, H. Lyu, and J. Luo, “Characterizing discourse about COVID- 19 vaccines: A Reddit version of the pandemic story,” Health Data Sci., vol. 2021, p. 9837856, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Reddit in the time of COVID,

    V. Veselovsky and A. Anderson, “Reddit in the time of COVID,” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 17, pp. 878–889, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    An analysis on top commented posts in reddit social network about COVID-19,

    K. Kimiafar, M. Dadkhah, M. Sarbaz, and M. Mehraeen, “An analysis on top commented posts in reddit social network about COVID-19,” J. Med. Signals Sens., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    Surveillance of COVID -19 pandemic using social media: A reddit study in North Carolina,

    C. Whitfield, Y. Liu, and M. Anwar, “Surveillance of COVID -19 pandemic using social media: A reddit study in North Carolina,” in Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, 2021, pp. 1–8

    2021

  50. [58]

    Symptom extraction from the narratives of personal experiences with COVID -19 on Reddit,

    M. Curtis, M. Lewis, T. Jonathan, and M. Mark, “Symptom extraction from the narratives of personal experiences with COVID -19 on Reddit,” arXiv [cs.CL], 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Mental health of HBCU college students during the COVID-19 pandemic,

    S. X. Wang and J. Goodman, “Mental health of HBCU college students during the COVID-19 pandemic,” medRxiv, 2021

    2021

  52. [60]

    Isolation Forest,

    F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z. -H. Zhou, “Isolation Forest,” in 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining , 2008, pp. 413–422

    2008

  53. [61]

    [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    “J-hartmann/emotion-english-distilroberta-base, Available: https://huggingface.co/j-hartmann/emotion-english-distilroberta-base. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  54. [62]

    [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    “cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-offensive, Available: https://huggingface.co/cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-offensive. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  55. [63]

    The softmax function: Properties, motivation, and interpretation,

    M. Franke and J. Degen, “The softmax function: Properties, motivation, and interpretation,” PsyArXiv, 2023

    2023

  56. [64]

    Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test,

    “Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test,” Rockstar-english.com. [Online]. Available: https://rockstar -english.com/lessons/advanced/12- Flesch_Kincaid_Readability_Test.pdf. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  57. [65]

    Readability,

    “Readability,” PyPI. [Online]. Available: https://pypi.org/project/readability/. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  58. [66]

    VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text,

    C. Hutto and E. Gilbert, “VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text,” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 216–225, 2014

    2014

  59. [67]

    Analysing Public Sentiments Regarding COVID -19 Vaccine on Twitter,

    K. Rahul, B. R. Jindal, K. Singh, and P. Meel, “Analysing Public Sentiments Regarding COVID -19 Vaccine on Twitter,” in 2021 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 2021, vol. 1, pp. 488–493

    2021

  60. [68]

    Investigating and analyzing self -reporting of Long COVID on Twitter: Findings from sentiment analysis,

    N. Thakur, “Investigating and analyzing self -reporting of Long COVID on Twitter: Findings from sentiment analysis,” Appl. Syst. Innov., vol. 6, no. 5, p. 92, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    Twitter sentiment analysis of COVID-19 in India: VADER perspective,

    K. Bhadra, A. Dash, S. Darshana, M. Pandey, S. S. Rautaray, and R. K. Barik, “Twitter sentiment analysis of COVID-19 in India: VADER perspective,” in 2023 International Conference on Communication, Circuits, and Systems (IC3S), 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  62. [70]

    An approach to analyze the social acceptance of virtual assistants by elderly people,

    N. Thakur and C. Y. Han, “An approach to analyze the social acceptance of virtual assistants by elderly people,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things, 2018

    2018

  63. [71]

    Eigenvalue and generalized eigenvalue problems: Tutorial,

    B. Ghojogh, F. Karray, and M. Crowley, “Eigenvalue and generalized eigenvalue problems: Tutorial,” arXiv [stat.ML], 2019

    2019

  64. [72]

    A dynamic analysis of moving average rules,

    C. Chiarella, X. -Z. He, and C. Hommes, “A dynamic analysis of moving average rules,” J. Econ. Dyn. Control, vol. 30, no. 9 –10, pp. 1729–1753, 2006

    2006

  65. [73]

    Survey of Peaks/Valleys identification in Time Series,

    R. Schneider, “Survey of Peaks/Valleys identification in Time Series,” Uzh.ch. [Online]. Available: https://www.ifi.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff - 96c1-007c-0000-00000c9b1cfd/ReportRSchneider.pdf. [Accessed: 22-Dec-2024]

    2024

  66. [74]

    CDC museum COVID -19 timeline,

    CDC, “CDC museum COVID -19 timeline,” Available: https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html. [Accessed: 10 - Nov-2024]

    2024

  67. [75]

    Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID -19) and the virus that causes it,

    “Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID -19) and the virus that causes it,” Who.int. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus- 2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid- 2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it. [Accessed: 10...

    2019

  68. [76]

    WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020,

    “WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020,” Who.int. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director- general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11- march-2020. [Accessed:...

    2020

  69. [77]

    ‘Liberation’ as Wuhan’s coronavirus lockdown ends after 76 days,

    L. Kuo, “‘Liberation’ as Wuhan’s coronavirus lockdown ends after 76 days,” The guardian, The Guardian, 07-Apr-2020

    2020

  70. [78]

    Calls for inquiry as UK reports highest Covid -19 death toll in Europe,

    N. Davis, F. Perraudin, D. Campbell, and M. Weaver, “Calls for inquiry as UK reports highest Covid -19 death toll in Europe,” The guardian, The Guardian, 05-May-2020

    2020

  71. [79]

    June 11 coronavirus news,

    S. George et al., “June 11 coronavirus news,” CNN, 11-Jun-2020

    2020

  72. [80]

    July 30 coronavirus news,

    N. Gan, A. Renton, E. Reynolds, E. Upright, M. Macaya, and M. Wagner, “July 30 coronavirus news,” CNN, 30-Jul-2020

    2020

  73. [81]

    COVID-19 deaths top 1 million worldwide. How these 5 nations are driving the pandemic,

    N. Aizenman, “COVID-19 deaths top 1 million worldwide. How these 5 nations are driving the pandemic,” NPR, NPR, 28-Sep-2020

    2020

  74. [82]

    Pfizer, BioNTech say Covid vaccine is more than 90% effective — ‘great day for science and humanity,’

    S. Meredith, “Pfizer, BioNTech say Covid vaccine is more than 90% effective — ‘great day for science and humanity,’” CNBC, 09-Nov-

  75. [83]

    U.K. becomes first country to approve Pfizer -BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine,

    “U.K. becomes first country to approve Pfizer -BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine,” Available: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-k- becomes-first-country-approve-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-n1249651. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  76. [84]

    CDC warns new U.k. coronavirus variant is spreading fast in the U.s,

    M. Doucleff, “CDC warns new U.k. coronavirus variant is spreading fast in the U.s,” NPR, NPR, 13-Jan-2021

    2021

  77. [85]

    One year ago WHO declared covid -19 A pandemic, since then it’s claimed over 2.6 million lives,

    S. Ray, “One year ago WHO declared covid -19 A pandemic, since then it’s claimed over 2.6 million lives,” Forbes, 11 -Mar-2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2021/03/11/365-days-of- the-covid-19-pandemic-in-numbers/. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2021

  78. [86]

    How India’s 2nd COVID wave exploded ,

    “How India’s 2nd COVID wave exploded ,” Available: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/complete-collapse- preventive-health-indias-2nd-covid-wave/story?id=77316993 [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2024

  79. [87]

    South Africa announces sweeping coronavirus rules in face of variant-driven third wave,

    A. Wigglesworth, “South Africa announces sweeping coronavirus rules in face of variant-driven third wave,” The Los Angeles times, Los Angeles Times, 27-Jun-2021

    2021

  80. [88]

    August 3, 2021 US coronavirus news,

    M. Mahtani, M. Hayes, M. Wagner, and V. Rocha, “August 3, 2021 US coronavirus news,” CNN, 03-Aug-2021

    2021

  81. [89]

    COVID-19 Virtual Press conference transcript - 14 September 2021,

    “COVID-19 Virtual Press conference transcript - 14 September 2021,” Available: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid - 19-virtual-press-conference-transcript---14-september-2021. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2021

  82. [90]

    Feelings of fear, sadness, and loneliness during the COVID -19 pandemic: Findings from two studies in the UK,

    A. Ypsilanti, E. Mullings, O. Hawkins, and L. Lazuras, “Feelings of fear, sadness, and loneliness during the COVID -19 pandemic: Findings from two studies in the UK,” J. Affect. Disord., vol. 295, pp. 1012–1023, 2021

    2021

  83. [91]

    Time and emotion during lockdown and the covid-19 epidemic: Determinants of our experience of time?,

    N. Martinelli et al., “Time and emotion during lockdown and the covid-19 epidemic: Determinants of our experience of time?,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, 2021

    2021

  84. [92]

    My Life during the Lockdown’: Emotional Experiences of European Adolescents during the COVID -19 Crisis,

    A. Forte et al., “My Life during the Lockdown’: Emotional Experiences of European Adolescents during the COVID -19 Crisis,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 14, p. 7638, 2021

    2021

  85. [93]

    Positive attitudes towards COVID -19 vaccines: A cross -country analysis,

    T. Greyling and S. Rossouw, “Positive attitudes towards COVID -19 vaccines: A cross -country analysis,” PLoS One , vol. 17, no. 3, p. e0264994, 2022

    2022

  86. [94]

    Public sentiment analysis of COVID -19 vaccination drive in India,

    A. D. Dubey, “Public sentiment analysis of COVID -19 vaccination drive in India,” SSRN Electron. J., 2021

    2021

  87. [95]

    Constructing a positive sentiment index for COVID-19: Evidence from G20 stock markets,

    D. Anastasiou, A. Ballis, and K. Drakos, “Constructing a positive sentiment index for COVID-19: Evidence from G20 stock markets,” Int. Rev. Fin. Anal., vol. 81, no. 102111, p. 102111, 2022

    2022

  88. [2020]

    Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/covid - vaccine-pfizer-drug-is-more-than-90percent-effective-in-preventing- infection.html

    [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/covid - vaccine-pfizer-drug-is-more-than-90percent-effective-in-preventing- infection.html. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2024]

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.