Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Understanding thermalization in a non-Abelian gauge theory in terms of its soft modes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chaos in the soft gluon modes of SU(2) gauge theory sets the thermalization time to about 0.50(3) fm/c at $T \sim 600$ MeV.

desk verdict Solid λ_L measurements for SU(2) soft modes, but the headline thermalization time rests on an inferred Lyapunov spectrum and an overstated 'only assumption' claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04397 v2 pith:R4QEXRRH submitted 2025-01-08 hep-lat hep-phhep-thnucl-th

Sayak Guin , Harshit Pandey , Sayantan Sharma This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-phhep-thnucl-th MSC 81T2581T1337D4581T80 PACS 11.15.Ha12.38.Mh05.45.-a
keywords thermalizationLyapunovexponentSU(2)gaugetheorysoftgluonmodesKolmogorov-Sinaientropyout-of-time-orderedcorrelatorlatticequark-gluonplasma
topics Yang-Mills Mass Gap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the thermalization of a non-Abelian gauge plasma is governed by the chaotic dynamics of its infrared soft (magnetic) modes, and that a thermalization time can be derived from their Lyapunov spectrum. In lattice simulations of SU(2) gauge theory, the authors find positive maximal Lyapunov exponents in both thermal equilibrium and an over-occupied non-thermal self-similar state, which indicates phase-space mixing. Using the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate obtained from the positive Lyapunov exponents, they estimate $t_{\rm th} = 0.8/\lambda_L(T)$, about 0.50(3) fm/c at $T \sim 600$ MeV and 0.70(5) fm/c at $T \sim 450$ MeV. Near the deconfinement transition, the maximal Lyapunov exponent of the long-wavelength critical modes peaks at $T_c$, as computed through a $Z_2$ scalar field theory in the same universality class. If correct, this connects a microscopic chaos measure to the early-time hydrodynamization of the quark-gluon plasma.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Lyapunov spectrum of the soft modes. In the thermal regime, the dynamics of magnetic gluons is described by an effective Langevin equation in which hard modes act as a heat bath; two nearby gauge configurations are evolved with noise and damping switched off, and the maximal Lyapunov exponent is extracted from the gauge-invariant separation $d(t) = (1/2N_p)\sum_P |\mathrm{tr}\,U_P(t) - \mathrm{tr}\,U'_P(t)| \sim e^{\lambda_L t}$. For the non-thermal state, classical-statistical evolution starts from an over-occupied gluon distribution and the exponent is measured inside the self-similar scaling regime. The Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate is then obtained through the Pesin identity as the sum of all positive Lyapunov exponents, and the thermalization time follows from $t_{\rm th} = 0.8/\lambda_L(T)$. Near $T_c$, the critical-mode Lyapunov exponent is extracted from the out-of-time-ordered correlator of a $Z_2$ scalar field, justified by the shared universality class with SU(2) deconfinement.

What would settle it

Along a non-equilibrium trajectory, compute the maximal Lyapunov exponent $\lambda_L(t)$ at several times before equilibrium; if it differs by more than the quoted uncertainty from the thermal-state value used in $t_{\rm th} = 0.8/\lambda_L(T)$, the constant-rate integration fails. Alternatively, compute the thermodynamic entropy density $s(t)$ directly from the evolving gluon distribution $f(p,t)$ and compare $\dot{s}(t)$ with the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate; a mismatch would invalidate the identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the soft gluon modes of SU(2) gauge theory form a chaotic dynamical system whose positive Lyapunov exponents quantify how fast information about the initial state is lost. In thermal equilibrium at high temperature, the maximal Lyapunov exponent grows linearly with temperature, $\lambda_L/T \approx 0.52$, and the measured values respect the conjectured bound $\lambda_L \le 2\pi T$. In a non-thermal over-occupied state in the self-similar scaling regime, $\lambda_L$ is comparable in magnitude to that of a thermal state with the same energy density. Summing the positive Lyapunov exponents gives the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate, and integrating the entropy difference between the non-thermal and thermal states yields the thermalization time $t_{\rm th} = 0.8/\lambda_L(T)$, about 0.50(3) fm/c at $T \sim 600$ MeV. Near the deconfinement transition, the maximal Lyapunov exponent of critical modes, obtained from the out-of-time-ordered correlator of a classical $Z_2$ scalar field theory, reaches its maximum at $T_c$, with temperature power laws $T^{6.8(7)}$ below and $T^{-2.8(3)}$ above.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate computed from the positive Lyapunov exponents of the final thermal state equals the physical entropy production rate of the soft modes throughout the non-equilibrium evolution, so that one can integrate this single rate from the over-occupied attractor to equilibrium.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The soft modes of SU(2) gauge theory are chaotic both in thermal equilibrium and in the non-thermal self-similar state, so thermalization of the infrared sector can be viewed as chaotic phase-space mixing rather than purely perturbative scattering.
  • Starting from an over-occupied gluon state, a thermal state at $T \sim 600$ MeV is reached in about $0.50(3)$ fm/c, and one at $T \sim 450$ MeV in about $0.70(5)$ fm/c.
  • At high temperatures the maximal Lyapunov exponent behaves as $\lambda_L/T \approx 0.52$, consistent with the bound $\lambda_L \le 2\pi T$; the butterfly velocity is about $0.8c$ and the configuration-space diffusion coefficient falls roughly as $T^{-1}$.
  • Near deconfinement, $\lambda_L$ of the critical modes is maximal at $T_c$, so phase-space spreading is strongest at the transition; the diffusion coefficient $D$ is temperature-independent below $T_c$ and decreases sharply above it.
  • The obtained thermalization time is shorter than perturbative bottom-up estimates ($\gtrsim 2.5$ fm/c) and consistent with the early hydrodynamization time inferred in heavy-ion collisions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct numerical test would be to compute $\lambda_L(t)$ at several times along the non-equilibrium trajectory; if it drifts away from the thermal-state value before equilibrium, the constant-rate integration underlying $t_{\rm th}$ breaks down.
  • Because the near-$T_c$ analysis relies on the $Z_2$ universality class, repeating the out-of-time-ordered-correlator measurement in SU(3) near its deconfinement transition would show whether the $\lambda_L$ peak at $T_c$ is generic or specific to SU(2).
  • The entropy production in the paper is information-theoretic (Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy); comparing it with the thermodynamic entropy computed from the evolving distribution $f(p,t)$ would connect the chaos measure to a measurable entropy current.
  • The $0.5$ fm/c estimate is for a static, non-expanding box; applying the same method to a Bjorken-expanding glasma geometry with a time-dependent effective temperature could shift the estimate toward the range inferred from heavy-ion data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies classical-statistical SU(2) lattice gauge theory in and out of equilibrium and reports measurements of the maximal Lyapunov exponent lambda_L of soft gluonic modes. In the thermal case, lambda_L is extracted from the gauge-invariant plaquette distance for temperatures in the 0.6-3 GeV range and found to obey lambda_L ~ 0.52 T; in the non-thermal case, an over-occupied initial condition in the self-similar scaling regime gives lambda_L = 0.66 Q_s, which is compatible with the thermal trend when the temperature is defined through the energy density. The authors also compute OTOCs for a Z_2 scalar theory near the deconfinement transition and report that lambda_L maximizes at T_c. Using Eq. (15), they convert a conjectured Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate of the soft modes into a thermalization time t_th ~ 0.8/lambda_L ~ 0.50(3) fm/c at T ~ 600 MeV and 0.70(5) fm/c at T ~ 450 MeV.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper offers a non-perturbative, lattice-based route from Lyapunov spectra to a thermalization time in a gauge theory, with a concrete number relevant for heavy-ion phenomenology. The measurements of lambda_L in over-occupied SU(2) and in the Z_2 critical theory are useful additions to the existing literature, and the benchmark lambda_L/T ~ 0.52 below the MSS bound, together with consistency with lambda_L ~ g^2 E/6, lends credibility to the numerical method. However, the quantitative thermalization-time claim rests on an unverified identification between OTOC velocity-dependent exponents and the phase-space Lyapunov spectrum entering Pesin's formula, and on the assumption that the KS rate remains constant along the non-equilibrium trajectory. These gaps make the result interesting but not yet established at the level claimed in the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eq. (15)] The KS entropy rate is not measured directly; it is inferred by multiplying lambda_L by a factor 4. This factor assumes that about 1/3 of the 18N^3 Lyapunov exponents are positive (citing Ref. [12]) and that the positive exponents follow lambda(v) = lambda_L[1 - (v/v_B)^2] with v uniformly distributed in [0, v_B]. The paper measures only the maximal exponent lambda_L from d(t) and from OTOCs; it never computes the ordered phase-space Lyapunov spectrum. The velocity-dependent exponent lambda(v) obtained from an OTOC butterfly cone is the growth rate of a localized perturbation, not the ordered set of exponents entering the Pesin identity. An O(1) uncertainty in the factor 4 propagates linearly into the headline t_th = 0.8/lambda_L = 0.50(3) fm/c. The authors should either compute the full spectrum and evaluate the sum in Eq. (15) explicitly, or present a quantitative systematic-error estimate for the factor 4.
  2. [Sec. 5 and Sec. 6] The estimate assumes that the KS entropy production rate remains at its final-thermal-state value while the system evolves from the over-occupied self-similar attractor to the equilibrium state. The text states in Sec. 6 that 'the only assumption that goes into our calculation is the conservation of energy density of the soft modes during the entire evolution', but Eq. (15) already contains the spectrum-shape and positivity-fraction assumptions, and the constancy of dot_s_KS along the non-equilibrium trajectory is an additional assumption for which no evidence is provided. This should be stated explicitly and its effect on t_th should be assessed, or the thermalization-time claim should be correspondingly weakened.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 5] The abstract and Sec. 5 claim that 'spectra of positive Lyapunov exponents is observed' and that the authors 'extract the spectra of positive Lyapunov exponents'. The manuscript presents measurements of the maximal exponent only; no full spectrum is shown or computed. This overstatement is connected to the central claim because Eq. (15) is precisely the step where the full spectrum is replaced by an ansatz. Please correct the wording and distinguish what is measured from what is modeled.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] The word 'precession' should be 'precision' in the sentence describing the Gauss-law constraint.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The expression for the energy density, '6/N^3 sum_k |k| aT/|k|', is confusing because the |k| factors cancel; please rewrite it as the intended sum over oscillators or explain the notation.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eq. (15)] The KS entropy rate is defined with a minus sign in Eq. (15), whereas the standard KS entropy rate is the (positive) sum of the positive Lyapunov exponents. Please clarify the sign convention and how the integration leading to t_th is performed.
  4. [References] Reference [8] is titled 'Viscosity, black holes, and quantum field theory', which appears to be an incorrect title for the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy work; please verify and correct this reference.
  5. [Sec. 4] For the Z_2 OTOC results it would be helpful to state the lattice size, the number of thermal configurations, and how the quoted scaling exponents and their uncertainties were obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the thermalization-time estimate is a derived quantity from measured lambda_L, standard thermodynamic inputs, and an externally supported Lyapunov-spectrum model.

full rationale

The central estimate t_th = 0.8/lambda_L(T) follows from Eq. (15) by integrating the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate between the non-thermal and thermal entropy densities. The factor 4 in Eq. (15) is not fitted to the thermalization time; it is obtained from the fraction of positive Lyapunov exponents from an independent earlier calculation [12] and from a velocity-dependent lambda(v) ansatz that the authors state is 'evident in our data.' The final time is therefore a function of measured lambda_L and independently determined entropy densities rather than a renaming of an input. The same-group citations, especially Ref. [15], are used as a cross-check and as a methodological precedent, but the result does not reduce to that citation; lambda_L is also benchmarked against the Maldacena-Shenker-Stanford bound and the Muller-Trayanov relation. The main limitations are physical rather than circular: the KS rate is assumed constant along the non-equilibrium trajectory and equal to the thermal value, and Sec. 6's claim that energy conservation is 'the only assumption' is too strong because the factor-4 spectrum model and rate constancy are additional assumptions. These affect accuracy, not self-reference. No equation reduces to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central thermalization-time estimate rests on the effective description of soft modes (Bodeker Langevin dynamics), the classical-statistical approximation for highly occupied gauge fields, the identification of KS entropy rate with entropy production, the universality of the deconfinement critical dynamics with Z2 scalar fields, and the chosen initial occupation parameters. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Qs = 1.5 GeV
    Gluon saturation scale entering the initial non-thermal distribution in Sec. 3.1; chosen, not fitted, and sets the physical scale of the non-equilibrium simulation.
  • n0 = 16
    Initial gluon occupancy chosen in Sec. 3.1 so the non-thermal state matches the energy density of a thermal state at T ~ 2 GeV.
  • m^2 a^2 = -1
    Bare mass parameter of the Z2 scalar field Hamiltonian in Eq. 11; chosen by hand to be in the broken-symmetry regime.
  • lambda_s = 1
    Bare quartic coupling of the Z2 scalar field in Eq. 11; chosen by hand.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Classical-statistical approximation for highly occupied gauge fields
    Gauge fields with large occupation numbers are treated classically; used throughout Sec. 3.1 and standard in the field.
  • domain assumption Bodeker effective theory for soft magnetic modes at high T
    At high T, soft magnetic modes obey the Langevin equation Eq. 9 with perturbative color conductivity; relied on for all thermal T >> Tc results.
  • domain assumption Universality of critical dynamics with Z2 scalar field
    SU(2) deconfinement belongs to the 3D Ising universality class, so long-wavelength critical modes are modeled by a Z2 scalar field; assumed without derivation for the OTOC dynamics.
  • standard math Pesin identity: KS entropy equals sum of positive Lyapunov exponents
    Used in Eq. 15 to convert the Lyapunov spectrum into an entropy rate for a smooth Hamiltonian system.
  • domain assumption Conservation of soft-mode energy density during evolution
    Sec. 5 states the only assumption is conservation of the soft-mode energy density during evolution, used to relate initial and final states.
  • domain assumption Gauge-invariant distance measure grows with the maximal Lyapunov exponent
    The plaquette distance d(t) in Eq. 8 is assumed to grow with the maximal Lyapunov exponent; standard in lattice studies of Yang-Mills chaos.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Understanding thermalization in a non-Abelian gauge theory in terms of its soft modes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R4QEXRRH

@misc{pith2026250104397,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Understanding thermalization in a non-Abelian gauge theory in terms of its soft modes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R4QEXRRH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04397}
}
abstract

We measure the maximal Lyapunov exponent $\lambda_L$ of physical states in a SU(2) gauge theory consisting of soft momentum modes both in and out-of-thermal equilibrium conditions using ab-initio lattice techniques. We have implemented different algorithms to appropriately describe the dynamics of soft-modes for a wide range of temperatures and under non-equilibrium conditions. The non-equilibrium state has been realized starting from an over-occupied initial condition for low momentum soft gluons whereas the thermal state comprises of strongly interacting soft gluons at temperatures where these are well separated from the hard momentum modes. Spectra of positive Lyapunov exponents is observed in both these states, similar to a chaotic dynamical system. From the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate measured in terms of this spectrum, we estimate a typical time-scale of $\sim 0.50(3)$ fm/c to achieve thermalization at $T\sim 600$ MeV starting from the non-thermal state. We also measure, for the first time, the $\lambda_L$ for long wavelength critical modes of SU(2) using the out-of-time-ordered correlator of a classical $Z_2$ scalar field theory, which shares the same universal behavior with SU(2), near the deconfinement phase transition. The $\lambda_L$ is observed to maximize at the transition temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04397 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Lyapunov exponent as a function of T/Tc for a Z2 scalar field theory, which from universality represent the critical long-distance modes of a S U(2) thermal state near the deconfinement transition temperature Tc. The inset shows the growth of OTOC with time t.Tc. Further, in the inset of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Lyapunov exponent as a function of T/Tc for a SU(2) gauge theory in thermal equilibrium at high temperatures T >> Tc, shown as triangles. These are compared with the Lyapunov exponents in a non-thermal state of SU(2) with comparable energy densities (circles). The inset shows the growth of the gauge invariant distance measure with time t.Tc for a thermal state of SU(2) for 3 different temperatures. at higher ene… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficient D in SU(2) gauge theory at high temperatures T ≫ Tc. The inset shows the ballistic spread of the Lyapunov exponents in a typical thermal state of SU(2) at T = 1.2 GeV. The color gradient from green to red denotes increasing values of the distance function in the x-t plane. The temperature dependence of D at T ≫ Tc as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Imprints of $U_A(1)$ chiral anomaly and disorder in the Dirac eigenspectrum of QCD at finite temperature

    hep-lat 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Lattice QCD calculations show intermediate statistics in Dirac eigenvalues near the chiral crossover that correlate with disorder via Polyakov loops, with Thouless conductance serving as a new probe for effective UA(1...

  2. Revisiting the sphaleron and axion production rates in QCD at high temperatures

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Lattice simulations give sphaleron rates in hot QCD plasmas and show axion production rates deviate from perturbative predictions at high temperatures.

  3. Eigenstate Thermalization in 1+1-Dimensional SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory Coupled with Dynamical Fermions

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Exact diagonalization shows 1+1D SU(2) lattice gauge theory with dynamical fermions satisfies ETH, including for non-local string operators that display a memory peak.

  4. Comparative study of the butterfly velocity in holographic QCD models at finite temperature and chemical potential

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using three independent holographic methods, the authors obtain matching butterfly velocities for four QCD-like models and find a universal increase with temperature and decrease with chemical potential.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [12]

    Gong, Lyapunov spectra in su (2) lattice gauge theory, Physical Review D 49 (5) (1994) 2642

    C. Gong, Lyapunov spectra in su (2) lattice gauge theory, Physical Review D 49 (5) (1994) 2642

    work page 1994

  2. [1]

    Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory, AIP Conf

    J. Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory, AIP Conf. Proc. 739 (1) (2004) 3–62. arXiv:hep-ph/0409233

    arXiv 2004

  3. [2]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, R. Venugopalan, QCD ther- malization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (3) (2021) 035003. arXiv:2005.12299

    arXiv 2021

  4. [3]

    Krylov, J

    N. Krylov, J. Migdal, Works on the Foundations of Statistical Physics, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [4]

    C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, The Bell Sys- tem Technical Journal 27 (3) (1948) 379–423

    work page 1948

  6. [5]

    E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. 106 (1957) 620–630

    work page 1957

  7. [6]

    Latora, M

    V . Latora, M. Baranger, Kolmogorov-sinai entropy rate versus physical entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 520–523

    work page 1999

  8. [7]

    Dzugutov, E

    M. Dzugutov, E. Aurell, A. Vulpiani, Universal relation between the kolmogorov-sinai entropy and the thermodynamical entropy in simple liq- uids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1762–1765

    work page 1998

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    Kolmogorov, Viscosity, black holes, and quantum field theory, Dokl

    A. Kolmogorov, Viscosity, black holes, and quantum field theory, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 119 (1958) 861

    1958

  2. [9]

    J. B. Pesin, Ljapunov characteristic exponents and ergodic properties of smooth dynamical systems with an invariant measure, in: Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems, CRC Press, 2020, pp. 512–515

    2020

  3. [10]

    Savvidy, The yang-mills classical mechanics as a kolmogorov k- system, Physics Letters B 130 (5) (1983) 303–307

    G. Savvidy, The yang-mills classical mechanics as a kolmogorov k- system, Physics Letters B 130 (5) (1983) 303–307

    1983

  4. [11]

    M ¨uller, A

    B. M ¨uller, A. Trayanov, Deterministic chaos in non-abelian lattice gauge theory, Physical review letters 68 (23) (1992) 3387

    1992

  5. [13]

    Berges, K

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting, R. Venugopalan, Turbulent thermalization process in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies, Phys. Rev. D 89 (7) (2014) 074011. arXiv:1303.5650

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Berges, K

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting, R. Venugopalan, Universal at- tractor in a highly occupied non-Abelian plasma, Phys. Rev. D 89 (11) (2014) 114007. arXiv:1311.3005

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Pandey, R

    H. Pandey, R. Shanker, S. Sharma, Understanding the approach to ther- malization from the eigenspectrum of non-Abelian gauge theories (7 2024). arXiv:2407.09253

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ebner, B

    L. Ebner, B. M ¨uller, A. Sch¨afer, L. Schmotzer, C. Seidl, X. Yao, Entangle- ment properties of su (2) gauge theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04550 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy, Nature 561 (7723) (2018) 321–330. arXiv:1710.09425

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    arXiv:2402.01998

    Temperature Measurement of Quark-Gluon Plasma at Di fferent Stages (2 2024). arXiv:2402.01998

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Schuckert, M

    A. Schuckert, M. Knap, Many-body chaos near a thermal phase transition, SciPost Phys. 7 (2) (2019) 022. arXiv:1905.00904

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Rammensee, J

    J. Rammensee, J. D. Urbina, K. Richter, Many-body quantum interfer- ence and the saturation of out-of-time-order correlators, Physical Review Letters 121 (12) (2018) 124101

    2018

  13. [21]

    Hashimoto, K

    K. Hashimoto, K. Murata, R. Yoshii, Out-of-time-order correlators in quantum mechanics, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (10) (2017) 1–31

    2017

  14. [22]

    Khemani, D

    V . Khemani, D. A. Huse, A. Nahum, Velocity-dependent lyapunov ex- ponents in many-body quantum, semiclassical, and classical chaos, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 144304

    2018

  15. [23]

    Blake, Universal charge di ffusion and the butterfly e ffect in holo- graphic theories, Physical review letters 117 (9) (2016) 091601

    M. Blake, Universal charge di ffusion and the butterfly e ffect in holo- graphic theories, Physical review letters 117 (9) (2016) 091601

    2016

  16. [24]

    M. Mace, S. Schlichting, R. Venugopalan, O ff-equilibrium sphaleron transitions in the Glasma, Phys. Rev. D 93 (7) (2016) 074036. arXiv: 1601.07342

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Schlichting, Turbulent thermalization of weakly coupled non-abelian plasmas, Phys

    S. Schlichting, Turbulent thermalization of weakly coupled non-abelian plasmas, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065008. arXiv:1207.1450

    2012 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Berges, K

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, L. de Bruin, T. Butler, J. M. Pawlowski, Order parameters for gauge invariant condensation far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) (2024) 114011. arXiv:2307.13669

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Laine, A

    M. Laine, A. Vuorinen, Basics of Thermal Field Theory, V ol. 925, Springer, 2016. arXiv:1701.01554

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bodeker, On the e ffective dynamics of soft nonAbelian gauge fields at finite temperature, Phys

    D. Bodeker, On the e ffective dynamics of soft nonAbelian gauge fields at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B 426 (1998) 351–360. arXiv:hep-ph/ 9801430

    1998

  21. [29]

    P. B. Arnold, L. G. Ya ffe, High temperature color conductivity at next- to-leading log order, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 125014. arXiv:hep-ph/ 9912306

    2000

  22. [30]

    Fingberg, U

    J. Fingberg, U. M. Heller, F. Karsch, Scaling and asymptotic scaling in the SU(2) gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 392 (1993) 493–517. arXiv: hep-lat/9208012

    1993 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Svetitsky, L

    B. Svetitsky, L. G. Ya ffe, Critical Behavior at Finite Temperature Con- finement Transitions, Nucl. Phys. B 210 (1982) 423–447

    1982

  24. [32]

    Schweitzer, S

    D. Schweitzer, S. Schlichting, L. von Smekal, Spectral functions and dy- namic critical behavior of relativistic z2 theories, Nuclear Physics B 960 (2020) 115165

    2020

  25. [33]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016 (8) (2016) 1–17

    2016

  26. [34]

    Chirikov, D

    B. Chirikov, D. Shepelyanski, Stochastic oscillations of classical yang- mills, JETP Lett 34 (4) (1981)

    1981

  27. [35]

    Bir ´o, C

    T. Bir ´o, C. Gong, B. M ¨uller, Lyapunov exponent and plasmon damping rate in non-abelian gauge theories, Physical Review D 52 (2) (1995) 1260

    1995

  28. [36]

    Bilitewski, S

    T. Bilitewski, S. Bhattacharjee, R. Moessner, Temperature dependence of the butterfly e ffect in a classical many-body system, Physical review letters 121 (25) (2018) 250602

    2018

  29. [37]

    Bilitewski, S

    T. Bilitewski, S. Bhattacharjee, R. Moessner, Classical many-body chaos with and without quasiparticles, Physical Review B 103 (17) (2021) 174302

    2021

  30. [38]

    Ruidas, S

    S. Ruidas, S. Banerjee, Many-body chaos and anomalous di ffusion across thermal phase transitions in two dimensions, SciPost Physics 11 (5) (2021) 087

    2021

  31. [39]

    Butera, G

    P. Butera, G. Caravati, Phase transitions and lyapunov characteristic ex- ponents, Physical Review A 36 (2) (1987) 962

    1987

  32. [40]

    Blaizot, M

    J.-P. Blaizot, M. A. Nowak, Large N(c) confinement and turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 102001. arXiv:0801.1859

    2008 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Durhuus, P

    B. Durhuus, P. Olesen, The Spectral Density for Two-dimensional Con- tinuum QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 184 (1981) 461–475

    1981

  34. [42]

    Narayanan, H

    R. Narayanan, H. Neuberger, Universality of large N phase transitions in Wilson loop operators in two and three dimensions, JHEP 12 (2007) 066. arXiv:0711.4551

    2007 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A. V . Selikhov, M. Gyulassy, Color diffusion and conductivity in a quark- gluon plasma, Physics Letters B 316 (2-3) (1993) 373–380

    1993

  36. [44]

    Arnold, G

    P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, L. G. Ya ffe, Transport coefficients in high tem- perature gauge theories (i): leading-log results, Journal of High Energy Physics 2000 (11) (2000) 001

    2000

  37. [45]

    D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, P. Petreczky, S. Sharma, S. Tah, The spatial string tension and its effects on screening correlators in a thermal QCD plasma (1 2025). arXiv:2501.17943

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    G. D. Moore, The Sphaleron rate: Bodeker’s leading log, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 367–404. arXiv:hep-ph/9810313

    2000 arXiv

  39. [47]

    H. B. Meyer, Transport Properties of the Quark-Gluon Plasma: A Lattice QCD Perspective, Eur. Phys. J. A 47 (2011) 86. arXiv:1104.3708

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    U. W. Heinz, Thermalization at RHIC, AIP Conf. Proc. 739 (1) (2004) 163–180. arXiv:nucl-th/0407067

    2004 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Baier, A

    R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schi ff, D. T. Son, Does parton saturation at 7 high density explain hadron multiplicities at RHIC?, Phys. Lett. B 539 (2002) 46–52. arXiv:hep-ph/0204211

    2002 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Baier, A

    R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schi ff, D. T. Son, ’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 502 (2001) 51–58.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0009237

    2001

  43. [51]

    P. B. Arnold, J. Lenaghan, G. D. Moore, QCD plasma instabilities and bottom up thermalization, JHEP 08 (2003) 002. arXiv:hep-ph/ 0307325

    2003

  44. [52]

    Romatschke, M

    P. Romatschke, M. Strickland, Collective modes of an anisotropic quark gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 036004. arXiv:hep-ph/ 0304092

    2003

  45. [53]

    Rebhan, P

    A. Rebhan, P. Romatschke, M. Strickland, Hard-loop dynamics of non- Abelian plasma instabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 102303. arXiv: hep-ph/0412016

    2005 arXiv

  46. [54]

    P. B. Arnold, J. Lenaghan, G. D. Moore, L. G. Ya ffe, Apparent thermal- ization due to plasma instabilities in quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 072302. arXiv:nucl-th/0409068

    2005 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Kurkela, G

    A. Kurkela, G. D. Moore, Bjorken Flow, Plasma Instabilities, and Ther- malization, JHEP 11 (2011) 120. arXiv:1108.4684

    2011 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Schlichting, S

    S. Schlichting, S. Sharma, Chiral Instabilities and the Fate of Chirality Imbalance in Non-Abelian Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (10) (2023) 102303. arXiv:2211.11365

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Y . V . Kovchegov, Can thermalization in heavy ion collisions be de- scribed by QCD diagrams?, Nucl. Phys. A 762 (2005) 298–325. arXiv: hep-ph/0503038. 8

    2005 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.