REVIEW 3 cited by
PokerBench: Training Large Language Models to become Professional Poker Players
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
PokerBench: Training Large Language Models to become Professional Poker Players
read the original abstract
We introduce PokerBench - a benchmark for evaluating the poker-playing abilities of large language models (LLMs). As LLMs excel in traditional NLP tasks, their application to complex, strategic games like poker poses a new challenge. Poker, an incomplete information game, demands a multitude of skills such as mathematics, reasoning, planning, strategy, and a deep understanding of game theory and human psychology. This makes Poker the ideal next frontier for large language models. PokerBench consists of a comprehensive compilation of 11,000 most important scenarios, split between pre-flop and post-flop play, developed in collaboration with trained poker players. We evaluate prominent models including GPT-4, ChatGPT 3.5, and various Llama and Gemma series models, finding that all state-of-the-art LLMs underperform in playing optimal poker. However, after fine-tuning, these models show marked improvements. We validate PokerBench by having models with different scores compete with each other, demonstrating that higher scores on PokerBench lead to higher win rates in actual poker games. Through gameplay between our fine-tuned model and GPT-4, we also identify limitations of simple supervised fine-tuning for learning optimal playing strategy, suggesting the need for more advanced methodologies for effectively training language models to excel in games. PokerBench thus presents a unique benchmark for a quick and reliable evaluation of the poker-playing ability of LLMs as well as a comprehensive benchmark to study the progress of LLMs in complex game-playing scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Towards Generalist Game Players: An Investigation of Foundation Models in the Game Multiverse
The paper organizes research on generalist game AI into Dataset, Model, Harness, and Benchmark pillars and charts a five-level progression from single-game mastery to agents that create and live inside game multiverses.
-
Think in Games: Learning to Reason in Games via Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models
A reinforcement-learning pipeline for predicting macro-actions in Honor of Kings improves action prediction accuracy, but the method is imitation of human replay labels, not the claimed environmental interaction.
-
Towards Generalist Game Players: An Investigation of Foundation Models in the Game Multiverse
This work traces four eras of generalist game players across dataset, model, harness, and benchmark pillars and charts a five-level roadmap ending in agents that create and evolve within game multiverses.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.