Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 131 references

The Physics of Life: Exploring Information as a Distinctive Feature of Living Systems

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that living systems are set apart by how they use information about their environment to stay alive, and that this 'informational perspective' can guide origin-of-life and astrobiology research.

desk verdict A clear and honest synthesis of a semantic-information research program, but no new result and a load-bearing gap in the intrinsicness of viability. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08683 v1 pith:DCKTN3CM submitted 2025-01-15 cond-mat.soft astro-ph.EPcs.ITmath.ITnlin.AOq-bio.QM

Stuart Bartlett , Andrew W. Eckford , Matthew Egbert , Manasvi Lingam , Artemy Kolchinsky , Adam Frank , Gourab Ghoshal This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softastro-ph.EPcs.ITmath.ITnlin.AOq-bio.QM
keywords semanticinformationoriginoflifeastrobiologybiosignaturesviabilitymutualinformation-drivensystemsagency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the distinctive feature of living and proto-living systems is their active use of semantic information: the part of an agent's correlation with its environment that helps keep it viable. The authors present this as a unifying perspective for biology, origin-of-life research, and astrobiology, one that complements accounts based on thermodynamics, evolution, or genetic information. They review formal frameworks that quantify semantic information and the fitness value of information, and they point to experimental systems where the distinction can be tested. If the perspective is correct, detecting life beyond Earth and understanding how life began should center on whether a system acquires and uses information to sustain itself, not only on what molecules it contains.

What carries the argument

The central object is the agent-environment pair with state spaces for $X$ and $Y$, mutual information $I(X;Y)$, and a viability function that measures the agent's capacity to maintain itself, for example by resisting equilibration or avoiding a death-like attractor. Semantic information is identified by scrambling or adding noise to the correlation between agent and environment and observing which correlations change viability; a 'semantic threshold' separates correlations that matter from those that are merely syntactic. A companion framework, the fitness value of information, quantifies how much mutual information between environmental states and available cues increases maximal growth rate in fluctuating environments, typically through bet-hedging and rate-distortion theory. These formalisms carry the argument because they make the claim that information matters for staying alive quantitative and experimentally addressable.

What would settle it

In the proposed chemical-garden experiment, drive the system with a time-varying electrochemical signal whose statistical complexity increases linearly and measure the mutual information between the system's internal state and the drive; the central claim would be falsified if internal complexity stays flat and mutual information remains at zero even when a feedback loop would improve access to free energy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the use of semantic information is one of the most distinctive features of living systems. Semantic information is not every correlation between organism and environment; it is the subset of mutual information $I(X;Y)$ between an agent $X$ and its environment $Y$ that affects the agent's viability, where viability is an emergent property of the system's own dynamics rather than an externally imposed utility. The paper argues that this kind of information use, sensing and responding to environmental signals to maintain oneself, marks the transition from non-life to life and can serve as an agnostic biosignature. It is a perspective piece that synthesizes existing formal results and proposes experimental directions rather than reporting new experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the premise that a system's viability can be defined from its own intrinsic dynamics rather than from an observer's goals; if viability is always imposed from outside, the claimed distinction between semantic and merely statistical information loses its force.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Origin-of-life research should focus on the transition from information-neutral systems to information-driven systems, rather than on the emergence of specific molecules or structures.
  • Habitability assessments can include informational constraints, such as minimum cell sizes for gradient sensing and molecular communication rates between microbes, as quantitative filters for planetary environments.
  • Information-centric agnostic biosignatures, such as epsilon machine reconstruction or response-to-stimulus measures, could distinguish life from abiotic mimics without assuming Earth-like biochemistry.
  • Experimental platforms including active matter, synthetic cells, flow reactors, and growing chemical gardens offer controlled settings where the predicted semantic thresholds and information-driven transitions can be tested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If semantic information rather than replication or metabolism is the dividing line, a non-replicating system that maintains itself by responding to environmental signals would qualify as living, shifting definitions of life toward agency and away from Darwinian evolution.
  • The semantic-threshold phenomenon suggests a potential quantitative index, the bit rate of viability-relevant information per unit of resource, that could rank candidate living systems in origins-of-life experiments or planetary surveys.
  • A testable extension would compare two dissipative systems with identical energy budgets, only one of which uses an environmental signal to avoid hazards; if viability differs, the information is doing causal work in maintaining the system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This perspective paper argues that the use of semantic information is one of the most distinctive features of living and proto-living systems. It reviews a formal framework for semantic information based on a viability function (Ref. [14]) and illustrates it with forager, Daisy-World, and oscillatory network models. The paper also discusses the fitness value of information, proposes experimental tests in flow reactors and chemical gardens, and draws implications for origins-of-life research and astrobiology, including informational constraints on habitability and information-centric biosignatures. The central thesis is that living systems actively acquire, process, and use information about their environments to sustain themselves, in contrast to non-living systems.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted, the informational perspective provides a quantitative and potentially generalizable criterion for identifying life and life-like behavior, with direct applications in astrobiology and origins-of-life research. The paper is explicitly interdisciplinary and connects recent quantitative models (foraging, Daisy-World, Kuramoto) and experimental proposals (flow reactors, chemical gardens) to a conceptual thesis. Its strength is that it does not merely speculate: it anchors the discussion in concrete formalisms and proposed measurements, and it acknowledges complementarity with thermodynamic and evolutionary perspectives. However, the significance of the thesis rests on a definitional premise about the intrinsicality of viability, which the paper does not independently establish.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II.A] The paper asserts that the viability function is 'not an externally imposed utility function' but rather 'an emergent property of the intrinsic dynamics of an agent coupled to an environment,' citing Ref. [14]. Yet no operational criterion is given for distinguishing an intrinsic viability function from an externally assigned one. The three operationalizations cited in the paper—forager expected lifetime (Ref. [40]), replicator productivity (Ref. [42]), and Daisy-World stability (Ref. [41])—are all defined by the modelers from outside the system. Without a criterion for intrinsicality, the central distinction between semantic and syntactic information collapses: for any non-living dissipative structure (e.g., a hurricane), one can define viability as time-to-dissipation, scramble its correlations with the environment, and reproduce the semantic-threshold phenomenon. This undermines the paper's claim that semantic information is distinctive of life. The manuscript should either provide an operational criterion for intrinsic viability or explicitly moderate the claim to avoid a definitional circularity.
  2. [Section III] The proposed origins-of-life experiment (Figure 3) is intended to test whether a system 'can transition to being information-driven,' but the listed conditions (a)–(c) presuppose the concept of viability they are meant to establish. Condition (c) requires 'feedback mechanisms connect information processing to increased viability,' while viability has already been presupposed as the basis for the semantic-information definition. This makes the experiment circular as a test of the semantic-information framework. Please clarify how viability would be measured independently of the information-theoretic quantities (e.g., statistical complexity and mutual information) so that the proposed experiment is capable of falsifying the claim that the system has transitioned to information-driven dynamics.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II.A] In the sentence 'it is defined an emergent property of the intrinsic dynamics,' the word 'as' is missing; it should read 'defined as an emergent property.'
  2. [Section IV.A] The phrase 'This kind of studies highlight' is a subject-verb disagreement; consider 'These kinds of studies highlight' or 'This kind of study highlights.'
  3. [Abstract and Section I] The abstract states that information is 'an essential and distinctive feature' of living systems, while Section I says it is 'one of the most distinctive and important features.' These claims differ in strength; please align them to avoid overstating the thesis.
  4. [Section IV.A] The assertion that 'information processing is a universal feature of living systems, extending plausibly to extraterrestrial life' extrapolates from a small set of terrestrial examples and models; adding a qualifier such as 'if the informational perspective is correct' would make the conditional nature of the claim clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No constructional circularity: the paper is a perspective that imports its key premise from prior work by overlapping authors, but no equation, fitted value, or prediction reduces to its own input.

full rationale

This is an explicitly perspective-style paper, not a derivation. It contains no fitted parameters, no equations that reduce to definitions, and no quantity that is fit on a subset of data and then presented as a prediction. The central claim that semantic information use is a distinctive feature of living systems is an interpretive synthesis built from definitions: Section I characterizes organisms as agents with intrinsic goals such as viability, and Section II.A defines semantic information as the portion of mutual information that influences viability. One could view the conclusion as unpacking those definitions, but the paper does not claim to derive a novel mathematical fact; it argues for a viewpoint and supports it with published, externally checkable models (Refs. [14], [40], [41], [45]). The most fragile premise, that the viability function is an emergent property of intrinsic dynamics rather than an externally imposed utility function, is imported from Ref. [14], coauthored by a present author, and is asserted rather than proven here. That is a genuine epistemic gap and a source of vulnerability for the thesis, but it is an unproven premise rather than a circular reduction: no equation or fitted value in the present paper forces the conclusion. The heavy representation of overlapping authors among the cited frameworks raises community-diversity and confirmation concerns, but under the hard rules self-citation alone is not circularity. Accordingly, no specific circular step is identified; score 2 reflects noticeable self-citation and a load-bearing imported premise, not a constructional equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on several domain assumptions inherited from the semantic-information and agency literature, listed above. These are not flaws in a perspective, but they are unproved premises that the argument depends on.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Living systems are agents with intrinsic goals such as viability, growth, and replication.
    Introduced in Section I as a premise of the informational perspective; the paper does not prove this, but treats it as background from the agency literature.
  • domain assumption The viability function is an emergent property of the intrinsic dynamics of an agent coupled to an environment, not an externally imposed utility function.
    Section II A, built on Ref. [14]. The definition of semantic information depends on this premise; if viability is externally defined, the distinction between semantic and syntactic information collapses.
  • domain assumption Information processing is a universal feature of living systems, extending plausibly to extraterrestrial life.
    Section IV A extrapolates from Earth life to all possible life without independent evidence. This is a stated assumption of the astrobiological application.
  • domain assumption Semantic information may have emerged during early stages of life and could have facilitated critical transitions in abiogenesis.
    Section III presents this as a plausible hypothesis guiding origins-of-life research, not as an established result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Physics of Life: Exploring Information as a Distinctive Feature of Living Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DCKTN3CM

@misc{pith2026250108683,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Physics of Life: Exploring Information as a Distinctive Feature of Living Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DCKTN3CM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08683}
}
read the original abstract

This paper explores the idea that information is an essential and distinctive feature of living systems. Unlike non-living systems, living systems actively acquire, process, and use information about their environments to respond to changing conditions, sustain themselves, and achieve other intrinsic goals. We discuss relevant theoretical frameworks such as ``semantic information'' and ``fitness value of information''. We also highlight the broader implications of our perspective for fields such as origins-of-life research and astrobiology. In particular, we touch on the transition to information-driven systems as a key step in abiogenesis, informational constraints as determinants of planetary habitability, and informational biosignatures for detecting life beyond Earth. We briefly discuss experimental platforms which offer opportunities to investigate these theoretical concepts in controlled environments. By integrating theoretical and experimental approaches, this perspective advances our understanding of life's informational dynamics and its universal principles across diverse scientific domains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08683 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Semantic information, autonomous agency and non-equilibrium statistical physics,

    Artemy Kolchinsky and David H. Wolpert, “Semantic information, autonomous agency and non-equilibrium statistical physics,” Interface Focus 8, 20180041 (2018)

    2018

  2. [40]

    Semantic information in a model of resource gathering agents,

    Damian R. Sowinski, Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback, Robert N. Markwick, Jordi Pi˜ nero, Marcelo Gleiser, Artemy Kolchinsky, Gourab Ghoshal, and Adam Frank, “Semantic information in a model of resource gathering agents,” Phys. Rev. X Life 1, 023003– (2023)

    2023

  3. [42]

    Information bounds production in replicator systems

    Jordi Pi˜ nero, Damian R. Sowinski, Gourab Ghoshal, Adam Frank, and Artemy Kolchinsky, “Information bounds production in replicator systems,” (2024), arXiv:2501.00396 [physics.bio-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [41]

    Exo-Daisy World: Revisiting Gaia The- ory through an Informational Architecture Per- spective,

    Damian R Sowinski, Gourab Ghoshal, and Adam Frank, “Exo-Daisy World: Revisiting Gaia The- ory through an Informational Architecture Per- spective,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.03421 (2024), arXiv:2411.03421 [astro-ph.EP]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [1]

    Maturana and Francisco J

    Humberto R. Maturana and Francisco J. Varela, Au- topoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Dordrecht: Springer, 1980)

    1980

  6. [2]

    Varela, Principles of Biological Autonomy , 2nd ed., edited by Ezequiel A

    Francisco J. Varela, Principles of Biological Autonomy , 2nd ed., edited by Ezequiel A. Di Paolo and Evan Thompson (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1979/2025)

    1979

  7. [3]

    Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, and Evan Thompson, The Blind Spot: Why Science Cannot Ignore Human Experience (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2024)

    2024

  8. [4]

    The Cognitive Domain of a Glider in the Game of Life,

    Randall D. Beer, “The Cognitive Domain of a Glider in the Game of Life,” Artificial Life 20, 183–206 (2014)

    2014

Show all 131 references
  1. [5]

    Norm- Establishing and Norm-Following in Autonomous Agency,

    Xabier E. Barandiaran and Matthew D. Egbert, “Norm- Establishing and Norm-Following in Autonomous Agency,” Artificial Life 20, 5–28 (2013)

    2013

  2. [6]

    The theoretical foundations of enaction: Precariousness,

    Randall D. Beer and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, “The theoretical foundations of enaction: Precariousness,” Biosystems 223, 104823 (2023)

    2023

  3. [7]

    The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered,

    Pamela Lyon, “The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered,” Front. Microbiol. 6, 264 (2015)

    2015

  4. [8]

    On Having No Head: Cognition throughout Biological Systems,

    Frantiˇ sek Baluˇ ska and Michael Levin, “On Having No Head: Cognition throughout Biological Systems,” Front. Psychol. 7, 902 (2016)

    2016

  5. [9]

    All living cells are cognitive,

    James A. Shapiro, “All living cells are cognitive,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 564, 134–149 (2021)

    2021

  6. [10]

    Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action,

    Xabier E. Barandiaran, Ezequiel Di Paolo, and Marieke Rohde, “Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action,” Adapt. Behav 17, 367–386 (2009)

    2009

  7. [11]

    Kauffman, A World Beyond Physics: The Emer- gence and Evolution of Life (Oxford University Press, 2019)

    S.A. Kauffman, A World Beyond Physics: The Emer- gence and Evolution of Life (Oxford University Press, 2019)

    2019

  8. [12]

    Philip Ball, How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2023)

    2023

  9. [13]

    Be- haviour and the Origin of Organisms,

    Matthew Egbert, Martin M. Hanczyc, Inman Harvey, Nathaniel Virgo, Emily C. Parke, Tom Froese, Hiroki Sayama, Alexandra S. Penn, and Stuart Bartlett, “Be- haviour and the Origin of Organisms,” Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 53, 87–112 (2023)

    2023

  10. [15]

    Information in biological systems,

    John Collier, “Information in biological systems,” Phi- losophy of Information 8, 763–787 (2008)

    2008

  11. [16]

    Meaningful information, sensor evolution, and the tem- poral horizon of embodied organisms,

    Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, Daniel Polani, Kerstin Daut- enhahn, Ren´ e te Boekhorst, and Lola Canamero, “Meaningful information, sensor evolution, and the tem- poral horizon of embodied organisms,” in Artificial Life 7 VIII: Proceedings of the Eighth International Confer- ence on...

  12. [17]

    Self-re-production and functional- ity,

    Gerhard Schlosser, “Self-re-production and functional- ity,” Synthese 116, 303–354 (1998)

    1998

  13. [18]

    John Maynard Smith and E¨ ors Szathmary,The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)

    2000

  14. [19]

    An organizational account of biological functions,

    Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido, and Alvaro Moreno, “An organizational account of biological functions,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60, 813– 841 (2009)

    2009

  15. [20]

    Biological information,

    Peter Godfrey-Smith and Kim Sterelny, “Biological information,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007)

    2007

  16. [21]

    Information Theory in Living Systems, Methods, Applications, and Challenges,

    Robert A. Gatenby and B. Roy Frieden, “Information Theory in Living Systems, Methods, Applications, and Challenges,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 69, 635– 657 (2007)

    2007

  17. [22]

    The algo- rithmic origins of life,

    Sara Imari Walker and Paul C. W. Davies, “The algo- rithmic origins of life,” J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20120869 (2013)

    2013

  18. [23]

    Living is Information Processing: From Molecules to Global Systems,

    Keith D. Farnsworth, John Nelson, and Carlos Ger- shenson, “Living is Information Processing: From Molecules to Global Systems,” Acta Biotheor. 61, 203– 222 (2013)

    2013

  19. [24]

    Information Pro- cessing in Living Systems,

    Gaˇ sper Tkaˇ cik and William Bialek, “Information Pro- cessing in Living Systems,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Mat- ter Phys. 7, 89–117 (2016)

    2016

  20. [25]

    The fitness value of information,

    Matina C. Donaldson-Matasci, Carl T. Bergstrom, and Michael Lachmann, “The fitness value of information,” Oikos 119, 219–230 (2010)

    2010

  21. [26]

    Natural selection. V. how to read the fundamental equations of evolutionary change in terms of information theory,

    S. A. Frank, “Natural selection. V. how to read the fundamental equations of evolutionary change in terms of information theory,” J. Evol. Biol. 25, 2377–2396 (2012)

    2012

  22. [27]

    Evolution of biological information,

    T. D. Schneider, “Evolution of biological information,” Nucleic Acids Research 28, 2794–2799 (2000)

    2000

  23. [28]

    Information theory in ecology,

    Robert E. Ulanowicz, “Information theory in ecology,” Computers & Chemistry 25, 393–399 (2001)

    2001

  24. [29]

    The application of information theory to biochemical signaling systems,

    Alex Rhee, Raymond Cheong, and Andre Levchenko, “The application of information theory to biochemical signaling systems,” Phys. Biol. 9, 045011 (2012)

    2012

  25. [30]

    Information theory in molecular bi- ology,

    Christoph Adami, “Information theory in molecular bi- ology,” Phys. Life Rev. 1, 3–22 (2004)

    2004

  26. [31]

    Christoph Adami, The Evolution of Biological Informa- tion: How Evolution Creates Complexity, from Viruses to Brains (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024)

    2024

  27. [32]

    William Bialek, Biophysics: Searching for Principles (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012)

    2012

  28. [33]

    Manasvi Lingam and Abraham Loeb, Life in the Cos- mos: From Biosignatures to Technosignatures (Cam- bridge: Harvard University Press, 2021)

    2021

  29. [34]

    John Maynard Smith and Eors Szathmary, The origins of life: From the birth of life to the origin of language (OUP Oxford, 2000)

    2000

  30. [35]

    Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems,

    Ricard Sol´ e, Christopher P Kempes, Bernat Corominas- Murtra, Manlio De Domenico, Artemy Kolchinsky, Michael Lachmann, Eric Libby, Serguei Saavedra, Eric Smith, and David Wolpert, “Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems,” Interface Focus 14, 20240010 (2024)

    2024

  31. [36]

    The concept of information in biology,

    John Maynard Smith, “The concept of information in biology,” Philosophy of science 67, 177–194 (2000)

    2000

  32. [37]

    Ernst Mayr, What evolution is (Basic Books, New York, 2001)

    2001

  33. [38]

    Erwin Schr¨ odinger,What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944)

    1944

  34. [39]

    Energy flow and the organization of life,

    Harold Morowitz and Eric Smith, “Energy flow and the organization of life,” Complexity 13, 51–59 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    Light- driven eco-evolutionary dynamics in a synthetic replica- tor system,

    Kai Liu, Alex Blokhuis, Chris van Ewijk, Armin Kiani, Juntian Wu, Wouter H. Roos, and Sijbren Otto, “Light- driven eco-evolutionary dynamics in a synthetic replica- tor system,” Nat. Chem. 16, 79–88 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Meaning and Intentionality = Informa- tion + Evolution,

    Carlo Rovelli, “Meaning and Intentionality = Informa- tion + Evolution,” in Wandering Towards a Goal , The Frontiers Collection (Springer, Cham, 2018) pp. 17–27

    2018

  37. [45]

    Information-theoretic description of a feedback-control Kuramoto model,

    Damian R Sowinski, Adam Frank, and Gourab Ghoshal, “Information-theoretic description of a feedback-control Kuramoto model,” Phys. Rev. Re- search 6, 043188 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Synthetic cells engaged in molecular communication: An opportunity for modelling Shannon- and semantic-information in the chemical domain,

    Maurizio Magarini and Pasquale Stano, “Synthetic cells engaged in molecular communication: An opportunity for modelling Shannon- and semantic-information in the chemical domain,” Front. Comms. Net. 2, 724597 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    The application of information theory to biochemical signaling systems,

    Alex Rhee, Raymond Cheong, and Andre Levchenko, “The application of information theory to biochemical signaling systems,” Physical biology 9, 045011 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Eckford, and Tokuko Haraguchi, Molecular Communication , 2nd ed

    Tadashi Nakano, Andrew W. Eckford, and Tokuko Haraguchi, Molecular Communication , 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Advancements in Molecular Commu- nication,

    Nariman Farsad, H. Birkan Yilmaz, Andrew Eckford, Chan-Byoung Chae, and Weisi Guo, “A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Advancements in Molecular Commu- nication,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18, 1887–1919 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Chemo- taxis of nonbiological colloidal rods,

    Yiying Hong, Nicole M. K. Blackman, Nathaniel D. Kopp, Ayusman Sen, and Darrell Velegol, “Chemo- taxis of nonbiological colloidal rods,” Physical Review Letters 99, 178103 (2007)

    2007

  43. [51]

    Synthetic chemotaxis and collective behavior in active matter,

    Benno Liebchen and Hartmut L¨ owen, “Synthetic chemotaxis and collective behavior in active matter,” Accounts of Chemical Research 51, 2982–2990 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Self-organization of active parti- cles by quorum sensing rules,

    Tobias B¨ auerle, Andreas Fischer, Thomas Speck, and Clemens Bechinger, “Self-organization of active parti- cles by quorum sensing rules,” Nature Communications 9, 3232 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Multi-scale organization in communicat- ing active matter,

    Alexander Ziepke, Ivan Maryshev, Igor S. Aranson, and Erwin Frey, “Multi-scale organization in communicat- ing active matter,” Nature Communications 13, 6727 (2022), publisher: Nature Publishing Group. 8

    2022

  46. [54]

    Evolution and population dynamics in stochastic environments,

    Jin Yoshimura and Vincent A. A. Jansen, “Evolution and population dynamics in stochastic environments,” Res. Popul. Ecol. 38, 165–182 (1996)

    1996

  47. [55]

    A new interpretation of informa- tion rate,

    J. L. Kelly Jr., “A new interpretation of informa- tion rate,” Bell System Technical Journal 35, 917–926 (1956)

    1956

  48. [56]

    The value of in- formation for populations in varying environments,

    Olivier Rivoire and Stanislas Leibler, “The value of in- formation for populations in varying environments,” J. Stat. Phys. 142, 1124–1166 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Fitness value of in- formation with delayed phenotype switching: Optimal performance with imperfect sensing,

    Alexander S. Moffett, Nigel Wallbridge, Carrol Plum- mer, and Andrew W. Eckford, “Fitness value of in- formation with delayed phenotype switching: Optimal performance with imperfect sensing,” Phys. Rev. E102, 052403 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Optimized bacteria are environmental prediction engines,

    Sarah E. Marzen and James P. Crutchfield, “Optimized bacteria are environmental prediction engines,” Phys. Rev. E 98, 012408 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Toby Berger, Rate Distortion Theory: A Mathematical Basis for Data Compression (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971)

    1971

  52. [60]

    Fitness value of subjective information for living organisms,

    T. Barker, P. J. Thomas, A. S. Moffett, A. W. Eck- ford, and M. Pierobon, “Fitness value of subjective information for living organisms,” in Proc. 11th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication (NANOCOM) (2024) pp. 54–59

    2024

  53. [61]

    Subjective Information and Survival in a Sim- ulated Biological System,

    Tyler S. Barker, Massimiliano Pierobon, and Peter J. Thomas, “Subjective Information and Survival in a Sim- ulated Biological System,” Entropy 24, 639 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Living information theory: The 2002 Shannon lecture,

    Toby Berger, “Living information theory: The 2002 Shannon lecture,” IEEE Information Theory Society Newsletter 53, 6–19 (2002)

    2002

  55. [63]

    Mini- mal informational requirements for fitness,

    Alexander S. Moffett and Andrew W. Eckford, “Mini- mal informational requirements for fitness,” Phys. Rev. E 105, 014403 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    To code, or not to code, at the racetrack: Kelly betting and single-letter codes,

    Alexander S. Moffett and Andrew W. Eckford, “To code, or not to code, at the racetrack: Kelly betting and single-letter codes,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2104.14277 (2021), arXiv:2104.14277 [cs.IT]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Continuous culture–making a comeback?

    Paul A. Hoskisson and Glyn Hobbs, “Continuous culture–making a comeback?” Microbiology 151, 3153– 3159 (2005)

    2005

  58. [66]

    Single-Cell Technologies to Understand the Mechanisms of Cellular Adaptation in Chemostats,

    Naia Risager Wright, Nanna Petersen Rønnest, and Nikolaus Sonnenschein, “Single-Cell Technologies to Understand the Mechanisms of Cellular Adaptation in Chemostats,” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 579841 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    A Bayesian Analysis of the Probability of the Origin of Life Per Site Conducive to Abiogenesis,

    Manasvi Lingam, Ruth Nichols, and Amedeo Balbi, “A Bayesian Analysis of the Probability of the Origin of Life Per Site Conducive to Abiogenesis,” Astrobiology 24, 813–823 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Defining lyfe in the universe: From three privileged functions to four pillars,

    Stuart Bartlett and Michael L Wong, “Defining lyfe in the universe: From three privileged functions to four pillars,” Life 10, 42 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Thresholds in origin of life scenarios,

    Cyrille Jeancolas, Christophe Malaterre, and Philippe Nghe, “Thresholds in origin of life scenarios,” iScience 23 (2020), 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101756

    2020

  62. [70]

    Probing com- plexity: Thermodynamics and computational mechan- ics approaches to origins studies,

    Stuart J. Bartlett and Patrick Beckett, “Probing com- plexity: Thermodynamics and computational mechan- ics approaches to origins studies,” Interface focus 9, 20190058 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Between order and chaos,

    James P. Crutchfield, “Between order and chaos,” Nat. Phys. 8, 17–24 (2012)

    2012

  64. [72]

    Natural induction: Spontaneous adaptive or- ganisation without natural selection,

    Christopher L. Buckley, Tim Lewens, Michael Levin, Beren Millidge, Alexander Tschantz, and Richard A. Watson, “Natural induction: Spontaneous adaptive or- ganisation without natural selection,” Entropy 26, 765 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Ma- chine learning outperforms thermodynamics in measur- ing how well a many-body system learns a drive,

    Weishun Zhong, Jacob M Gold, Sarah Marzen, Jeremy L England, and Nicole Yunger Halpern, “Ma- chine learning outperforms thermodynamics in measur- ing how well a many-body system learns a drive,” Sci- entific Reports 11, 9333 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    How chemistry computes: Language recognition by non- biochemical chemical automata. from finite automata to turing machines,

    Marta Due˜ nas-D ´ ıez and Juan P´ erez-Mercader, “How chemistry computes: Language recognition by non- biochemical chemical automata. from finite automata to turing machines,” iScience 19, 514–526 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    Provenance of life: Chemical autonomous agents surviving through associa- tive learning,

    Stuart Bartlett and David Louapre, “Provenance of life: Chemical autonomous agents surviving through associa- tive learning,” Phys. Rev. E 106, 034401 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Escapement mechanisms and the conver- sion of disequilibria; the engines of creation,

    E. Branscomb, T. Biancalani, N. Goldenfeld, and M. Russell, “Escapement mechanisms and the conver- sion of disequilibria; the engines of creation,” Phys. Rep. 677, 1–60 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Aqueous elec- trochemistry: the toolbox for life’s emergence from re- dox disequilibria,

    Wolfgang Nitschke, Barbara Schoepp-Cothenet, Si- mon Duval, Kilian Zuchan, Orion Farr, Frauke Bay- mann, Francesco Panico, Alessandro Minguzzi, Elbert Branscomb, and Michael J. Russell, “Aqueous elec- trochemistry: the toolbox for life’s emergence from re- dox disequilibria,” ...

    2023

  70. [78]

    Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems,

    W. Ross Ashby, “Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems,” Cybernetica 1, 83–99 (1958)

    1958

  71. [79]

    Optimization of nonequilibrium free energy harvest- ing illustrated on bacteriorhodopsin,

    Jordi Pi˜ nero, Ricard Sol´ e, and Artemy Kolchinsky, “Optimization of nonequilibrium free energy harvest- ing illustrated on bacteriorhodopsin,” Physical Review Research 6, 013275 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Irwin, Life in the Universe: Expectations and Constraints, 3rd ed

    Dirk Schulze-Makuch and Louis N. Irwin, Life in the Universe: Expectations and Constraints, 3rd ed. (Cham: Springer, 2018)

    2018

  73. [81]

    Cockell, Astrobiology: Understanding Life in the Universe , 2nd ed

    Charles S. Cockell, Astrobiology: Understanding Life in the Universe , 2nd ed. (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2020)

    2020

  74. [82]

    Manasvi Lingam and Amedeo Balbi, From Stars to Life: A Quantitative Approach to Astrobiology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/research/ astrobiology-at-nasa/exobiology/

  76. [84]

    What makes a planet habitable?

    H. Lammer, J. H. Bredeh¨ oft, A. Coustenis, M. L. Khodachenko, L. Kaltenegger, O. Grasset, D. Prieur, F. Raulin, P. Ehrenfreund, M. Yamauchi, J. E. Wahlund, J. M. Grießmeier, G. Stangl, C. S. Cockell, Yu. N. Kulikov, J. L. Grenfell, and H. Rauer, “What makes a planet habitable...

    2009

  77. [85]

    Habitability: A Review,

    C. S. Cockell, T. Bush, C. Bryce, S. Direito, M. Fox- Powell, J. P. Harrison, H. Lammer, H. Landenmark, J. Martin-Torres, N. Nicholson, L. Noack, J. O’Malley- James, S. J. Payler, A. Rushby, T. Samuels, P. Schwend- ner, J. Wadsworth, and M. P. Zorzano, “Habitability: A Review,...

    2016

  78. [86]

    Kane, Planetary Habitability (Bristol: IOP Publishing, 2021)

    Stephen R. Kane, Planetary Habitability (Bristol: IOP Publishing, 2021)

    2021

  79. [87]

    The Ladder of Life Detection,

    Marc Neveu, Lindsay E. Hays, Mary A. Voytek, Michael H. New, and Mitchell D. Schulte, “The Ladder of Life Detection,” Astrobiology 18, 1375–1402 (2018)

    2018

  80. [88]

    Barbara Cavalazzi and Frances Westall, eds., Biosigna- tures for Astrobiology , Advances in Astrobiology and 9 Biogeophysics (Cham: Springer, 2019)

    2019

  81. [89]

    An Overview of Exoplanet Biosignatures,

    Edward W. Schwieterman and Michaela Leung, “An Overview of Exoplanet Biosignatures,” Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 90, 465–514 (2024), arXiv:2404.15431 [astro- ph.EP]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Theoretical Constraints Imposed by Gradient Detection and Dispersal on Microbial Size in Astrobiological Environments,

    Manasvi Lingam, “Theoretical Constraints Imposed by Gradient Detection and Dispersal on Microbial Size in Astrobiological Environments,” Astrobiology 21, 813– 830 (2021), arXiv:2102.05009 [astro-ph.EP]

    2021 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Ecological role of energy taxis in microorgan- isms,

    Gladys Alexandre, Suzanne Greer-Phillips, and Igor B. Zhulin, “Ecological role of energy taxis in microorgan- isms,” FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28, 113–126 (2004)

    2004

  84. [92]

    Behaviors and Strategies of Bac- terial Navigation in Chemical and Nonchemical Gradi- ents,

    Bo Hu and Yuhai Tu, “Behaviors and Strategies of Bac- terial Navigation in Chemical and Nonchemical Gradi- ents,” PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003672 (2014)

    2014

  85. [93]

    Stimulus sensing and signal processing in bacterial chemotaxis,

    Shuangyu Bi and Victor Sourjik, “Stimulus sensing and signal processing in bacterial chemotaxis,” Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 45, 22–29 (2018)

    2018

  86. [94]

    Communications, Entropy, and Life,

    Richard C. Raymond, “Communications, Entropy, and Life,” Am. Sci. 38, 273–278 (1950)

    1950

  87. [95]

    Loewenstein, The Touchstone of Life: Molec- ular Information, Cell Communication, and the Foun- dations of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)

    Werner R. Loewenstein, The Touchstone of Life: Molec- ular Information, Cell Communication, and the Foun- dations of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)

    1999

  88. [96]

    Bacterial Tactic Responses,

    Judith P. Armitage, “Bacterial Tactic Responses,” Adv. Microb. Physiol. 41, 229–289 (1999)

    1999

  89. [97]

    Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis,

    George H. Wadhams and Judith P. Armitage, “Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 1024–1037 (2004)

    2004

  90. [98]

    Exploring the function of bacterial chemo- taxis,

    Jerome Wong-Ng, Antonio Celani, and Massimo Ver- gassola, “Exploring the function of bacterial chemo- taxis,” Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 45, 16–21 (2018)

    2018

  91. [99]

    Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways,

    Steven L. Porter, George H. Wadhams, and Judith P. Armitage, “Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways,” Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 153–165 (2011)

    2011

  92. [100]

    Kirchman, Processes in Microbial Ecology, 2nd ed

    David L. Kirchman, Processes in Microbial Ecology, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    The role of microbial motility and chemotaxis in symbiosis,

    Jean-Baptiste Raina, Vicente Fernandez, Bennett Lam- bert, Roman Stocker, and Justin R. Seymour, “The role of microbial motility and chemotaxis in symbiosis,” Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 284–294 (2019)

    2019

  94. [102]

    Molecu- lar Communication in Interactions Between Plants and Microbial Pathogens,

    Richard A. Dixon and Christopher J. Lamb, “Molecu- lar Communication in Interactions Between Plants and Microbial Pathogens,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41, 339–367 (1990)

    1990

  95. [103]

    Small Talk: Cell-to-Cell Communi- cation in Bacteria,

    Bonnie L. Bassler, “Small Talk: Cell-to-Cell Communi- cation in Bacteria,” Cell 109, 421–424 (2002)

    2002

  96. [104]

    Quo- rum Sensing: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria,

    Christopher M. Waters and Bonnie L. Bassler, “Quo- rum Sensing: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria,” Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 319–346 (2005)

    2005

  97. [105]

    Learning from Bacteria about Nat- ural Information Processing,

    Eshel Ben-Jacob, “Learning from Bacteria about Nat- ural Information Processing,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1178, 78–90 (2009)

    2009

  98. [106]

    What is Life?

    Guenther Witzany, “What is Life?” Front. Astron. Space Sci. 7, 7 (2020)

    2020

  99. [107]

    Did life originate from a global chemical reactor?

    E. E. St¨ ueken, R. E. Anderson, J. S. Bowman, W. J. Brazelton, J. Colangelo-Lillis, A. D. Goldman, S. M. Som, and J. A. Baross, “Did life originate from a global chemical reactor?” Geobiology 11, 101–126 (2013)

    2013

  100. [108]

    The origin of life as a planetary phe- nomenon,

    Dimitar D. Sasselov, John P. Grotzinger, and John D. Sutherland, “The origin of life as a planetary phe- nomenon,” Sci. Adv. 6, eaax3419 (2020)

    2020

  101. [109]

    Setting the geological scene for the origin of life and continuing open questions about its emergence,

    Frances Westall, Andr´ e Brack, Alberto G. Fair´ en, and Mitchell D. Schulte, “Setting the geological scene for the origin of life and continuing open questions about its emergence,” Front. Astron. Space Sci. 9, 1095701 (2023)

    2023

  102. [110]

    Chapter 4: A Geological and Chemical Context for the Origins of Life on Early Earth,

    Laura E. Rodriguez, Thiago Altair, Ninos Y. Hermis, Tony Z. Jia, Tyler P. Roche, Luke H. Steller, and Jes- sica M. Weber, “Chapter 4: A Geological and Chemical Context for the Origins of Life on Early Earth,” Astro- biology 24, S76–S106 (2024)

    2024

  103. [111]

    Rebuilding the hab- itable zone from the bottom up with computational zones,

    Caleb Scharf and Olaf Witkowski, “Rebuilding the hab- itable zone from the bottom up with computational zones,” Astrobiology 24 (2024), 10.1089/ast.2023.0035

    2024

  104. [112]

    Size structures sensory hierarchy in ocean life,

    Erik A. Martens, Navish Wadhwa, Nis S. Jacobsen, Christian Lindemann, Ken H. Andersen, and Andr´ e Visser, “Size structures sensory hierarchy in ocean life,” Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20151346 (2015)

    2015

  105. [113]

    Information Transmission via Molec- ular Communication in Astrobiological Environments,

    Manasvi Lingam, “Information Transmission via Molec- ular Communication in Astrobiological Environments,” Astrobiology 24, 84–99 (2024), arXiv:2309.01924 [astro- ph.EP]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Biological Optical-to-Chemical Signal Conversion Interface: A Small-Scale Modulator for Molecular Communications,

    Laura Grebenstein, Jens Kirchner, Renata Stavra- cakis Peixoto, Wiebke Zimmermann, Florian Irnstor- fer, Wayan Wicke, Arman Ahmadzadeh, Vahid Jamali, Georg Fischer, Robert Weigel, , Andreas Burkovski, and Robert Schober, “Biological Optical-to-Chemical Signal Conversion Interf...

    2018

  107. [115]

    Efficacy of information transmission in cellu- lar communication,

    Sumantra Sarkar, Md Zulfikar Ali, and Sandeep Choubey, “Efficacy of information transmission in cellu- lar communication,” Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013092 (2023)

    2023

  108. [116]

    Planetary Scale Information Transmission in the Bio- sphere and Technosphere: Limits and Evolution,

    Manasvi Lingam, Adam Frank, and Amedeo Balbi, “Planetary Scale Information Transmission in the Bio- sphere and Technosphere: Limits and Evolution,” Life 13, 1850 (2023), arXiv:2309.07922 [physics.soc-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    A Non- Earthcentric Approach to Life Detection,

    Pamela G. Conrad and Kenneth H. Nealson, “A Non- Earthcentric Approach to Life Detection,” Astrobiology 1, 15–24 (2001)

    2001

  110. [118]

    Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts,

    Marjorie A. Chan, Nancy W. Hinman, Sally L. Potter- McIntyre, Keith E. Schubert, Richard J. Gillams, Stan- ley M. Awramik, Penelope J. Boston, Dina M. Bower, David J. Des Marais, Jack D. Farmer, Tony Z. Jia, Pene- lope L. King, Robert M. Hazen, Richard J. L´ eveill´ e, Do- min...

    2019

  111. [119]

    Determining the “Biosigna- ture Threshold

    Laura M. Barge, Laura E. Rodriguez, Jessica M. Weber, and Bethany P. Theiling, “Determining the “Biosigna- ture Threshold” for Life Detection on Biotic, Abiotic, or Prebiotic Worlds,” Astrobiology 22, 481–493 (2022)

    2022

  112. [120]

    Is There Such a Thing as a Biosignature?

    Christophe Malaterre, Inge Loes ten Kate, Mickael Baqu´ e, Vinciane Debaille, John Lee Grenfell, Em- manuelle J. Javaux, Nozair Khawaja, Fabian Klenner, Yannick J. Lara, Sean McMahon, Keavin Moore, Lena Noack, C. H. Lucas Patty, and Frank Postberg, “Is There Such a Thing as a ...

    2023

  113. [121]

    Morphology: An Ambiguous Indicator of Biogenicity,

    Juan Manuel Garc ´ ıa Ruiz, Anna Carnerup, Andrew G. Christy, Nicholas J. Welham, and Stephen T. Hyde, “Morphology: An Ambiguous Indicator of Biogenicity,” Astrobiology 2, 353–369 (2002)

    2002

  114. [122]

    False biosigna- tures on Mars: anticipating ambiguity,

    Sean McMahon and Julie Cosmidis, “False biosigna- tures on Mars: anticipating ambiguity,” J. Geol. Soc. 179, jgs2021–050 (2022). 10

    2022

  115. [123]

    Finger- printing Non-Terran Biosignatures,

    Sarah S. Johnson, Eric V. Anslyn, Heather V. Graham, Paul R. Mahaffy, and Andrew D. Ellington, “Finger- printing Non-Terran Biosignatures,” Astrobiology 18, 915–922 (2018)

    2018

  116. [124]

    Identify- ing molecules as biosignatures with assembly theory and mass spectrometry,

    Stuart M. Marshall, Cole Mathis, Emma Carrick, Gra- ham Keenan, Geoffrey J. T. Cooper, Heather Gra- ham, Matthew Craven, Piotr S. Gromski, Douglas G. Moore, Sara. I. Walker, and Leroy Cronin, “Identify- ing molecules as biosignatures with assembly theory and mass spectrometry,...

    2021

  117. [125]

    A robust, agnostic molecular biosignature based on machine learning,

    H. James Cleaves, Grethe Hystad, Anirudh Prabhu, Michael L. Wong, George D. Cody, Sophia Economon, and Robert M. Hazen, “A robust, agnostic molecular biosignature based on machine learning,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2307149120 (2023)

    2023

  118. [126]

    Assessing plane- tary complexity and potential agnostic biosignatures us- ing epsilon machines,

    Stuart Bartlett, Jiazheng Li, Lixiang Gu, Lana Sina- payen, Siteng Fan, Vijay Natraj, Jonathan H. Jiang, David Crisp, and Yuk L. Yung, “Assessing plane- tary complexity and potential agnostic biosignatures us- ing epsilon machines,” Nat. Astron. 6, 387–392 (2022), arXiv:2202.0...

    2022 arXiv

  119. [127]

    An information theory approach to identifying signs of life on transiting planets,

    Sara Vannah, Marcelo Gleiser, and Lisa Kaltenegger, “An information theory approach to identifying signs of life on transiting planets,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 528, L4–L9 (2024), arXiv:2310.09472 [astro- ph.EP]

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Measuring Information Trans- fer,

    Thomas Schreiber, “Measuring Information Trans- fer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 461–464 (2000), arXiv:nlin/0001042 [nlin.CD]

    2000 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Causality de- tection based on information-theoretic approaches in time series analysis,

    Katerina Hlav´ aˇ ckov´ a-Schindler, Milan Paluˇ s, Martin Vejmelka, and Joydeep Bhattacharya, “Causality de- tection based on information-theoretic approaches in time series analysis,” Phys. Rep. 441, 1–46 (2007)

    2007

  122. [130]

    Thermodynamic efficiency of information and heat flow,

    Armen E. Allahverdyan, Dominik Janzing, and Guenter Mahler, “Thermodynamic efficiency of information and heat flow,” J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2009, 09011 (2009), arXiv:0907.3320 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2009 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Effi- ciency of cellular information processing,

    Andre C. Barato, David Hartich, and Udo Seifert, “Effi- ciency of cellular information processing,” New J. Phys. 16, 103024 (2014), arXiv:1405.7241 [physics.bio-ph]

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.