Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Leveraging Online Olympiad-Level Math Problems for LLMs Training and Contamination-Resistant Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.14275 v2 pith:D25KDKSW submitted 2025-01-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords llmsproblemsevaluationforummatholympiad-levelreasoningability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked interest in their ability to solve Olympiad-level math problems. However, the training and evaluation of these models are constrained by the limited size and quality of available datasets, as creating large-scale data for such advanced problems requires extensive effort from human experts. In addition, current benchmarks are prone to contamination, leading to unreliable evaluations. In this paper, we present an automated pipeline that leverages the rich resources of the Art of Problem Solving (AoPS) forum, which predominantly features Olympiad-level problems and community-driven solutions. Using open-source LLMs, we develop a method to extract question-answer pairs from the forum, resulting in AoPS-Instruct, a dataset of more than 600,000 high-quality QA pairs. Our experiments demonstrate that fine-tuning LLMs on AoPS-Instruct improves their reasoning abilities across various benchmarks. Moreover, we build an automatic pipeline that introduces LiveAoPSBench, an evolving evaluation set with timestamps, derived from the latest forum data, providing a contamination-resistant benchmark for assessing LLM performance. Notably, we observe a significant decline in LLM performance over time, suggesting their success on older examples may stem from pre-training exposure rather than true reasoning ability. Our work presents a scalable approach to creating and maintaining large-scale, high-quality datasets for advanced math reasoning, offering valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in this domain. Our benchmark and code is available at https://github.com/DSL-Lab/aops

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A critic model trained with reinforcement learning judges semantic correctness of Lean 4 formalizations, and using it as a filter sharply improves autoformalization accuracy.

  2. Think Only When You Need with Large Hybrid-Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors introduce a two-stage training pipeline (supervised fine-tuning plus reinforcement learning) that lets a language model adaptively choose between a reasoning mode and a direct-answer mode, and a new metric...

  3. ThinkSwitcher: When to Think Hard, When to Think Fast

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ThinkSwitcher trains a lightweight module to predict when a reasoner should use short versus long chain-of-thought, reducing inference tokens by 20-30% with only a small accuracy drop.

  4. Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review that categorizes methods for shortening and adaptively triggering chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models.

Pith tools